A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Altimeter 3066



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 3rd 06, 08:42 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
M[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 207
Default Altimeter 3066

Jim Macklin wrote:
That is the highest pressure you can set on the Kollsman
window.



I can hardly see how it should affect VFR flights. Additionally if the
pressure is higher than 31 inch mercury and the altimeter is set to
3100, the true altitude would be higher than what's indicated by the
altimeter. For VFR flights this would almost never introduce any
problems. (Even for IFR terrain separation this allows a bigger margin
for terrain clearance).

The only problem I could think of is the mode C requirement for
altitude above 10,000 MSL, if someone flying without a mode C x-ponder,
set their altimeter to 3100, on day with pressure higher than 31"
mercury, and flying right near 10,000 feet indicated on their altimeter
:-)

  #2  
Old December 3rd 06, 09:12 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Wade Hasbrouck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 76
Default Altimeter 3066

"M" wrote in message
oups.com...
Jim Macklin wrote:
That is the highest pressure you can set on the Kollsman
window.



I can hardly see how it should affect VFR flights. Additionally if the
pressure is higher than 31 inch mercury and the altimeter is set to
3100, the true altitude would be higher than what's indicated by the
altimeter. For VFR flights this would almost never introduce any
problems. (Even for IFR terrain separation this allows a bigger margin
for terrain clearance).

The only problem I could think of is the mode C requirement for
altitude above 10,000 MSL, if someone flying without a mode C x-ponder,
set their altimeter to 3100, on day with pressure higher than 31"
mercury, and flying right near 10,000 feet indicated on their altimeter
:-)


I thought the Mode C transponder reports Pressure Altitude and is basically
fixed at 29.92?

  #3  
Old December 3rd 06, 09:45 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
M[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 207
Default Altimeter 3066


ATC computer converts the pressure altitude with local altimeter
setting. If ATC knows everyone is using 3100 as their altimeter setting
(can be by regulation in high pressure 31" situation, such as in
Canada), the computer can do similar converson, so the IFR separation
would not be unaffected.

Wade Hasbrouck wrote:


I thought the Mode C transponder reports Pressure Altitude and is basically
fixed at 29.92?


  #4  
Old December 3rd 06, 10:09 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,886
Default Altimeter 3066



M wrote:

ATC computer converts the pressure altitude with local altimeter
setting. If ATC knows everyone is using 3100 as their altimeter setting
(can be by regulation in high pressure 31" situation, such as in
Canada), the computer can do similar converson, so the IFR separation
would not be unaffected.


If the pressure gets above the limit IFR flight would not be allowed,
simple as that. That happened 10 or 15 years ago in Alaska. Very rare.
  #5  
Old December 3rd 06, 09:23 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
J. Severyn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 70
Default Altimeter 3066


"M" wrote in message
oups.com...



I can hardly see how it should affect VFR flights.


Well pattern altitudes might be one problem. How about easterly/westerly
odd/even +500 altitudes?

John Severyn
@KLVK


  #6  
Old December 3rd 06, 09:42 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
M[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 207
Default Altimeter 3066


So everybody fly their pattern 100 ft higher than normal. Big deal.

As long as everyone all max out their Kollsman's window at 3100 in the
same vacinity, even/odd +500 altitude would be just fine. You still
have the same vertical separation. Plus, VFR is see and avoid.
even/odd +500 altitude doesn't really do much separation when someone
flying magnetic course 001 converge with someone flying course magnetic
179, all legally at odd+500 VFR altitude and only 2 degree off from a
head-on.


J. Severyn wrote:
"M" wrote in message
oups.com...



I can hardly see how it should affect VFR flights.


Well pattern altitudes might be one problem. How about easterly/westerly
odd/even +500 altitudes?

John Severyn
@KLVK


  #7  
Old December 3rd 06, 10:06 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,886
Default Altimeter 3066



J. Severyn wrote:
"M" wrote in message
oups.com...


I can hardly see how it should affect VFR flights.



Well pattern altitudes might be one problem. How about easterly/westerly
odd/even +500 altitudes?


So you're a couple hundred feet off, that's no big deal. As for pattern
altitudes I always use 1000 agl, plus or minus depending on how I round
the field elevation.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ATC Altimeter Settings O. Sami Saydjari Instrument Flight Rules 81 April 11th 05 08:07 PM
Pressure Altitude and Terminology Icebound Piloting 0 November 27th 04 09:14 PM
Local altimeter at BFM Dan Luke Instrument Flight Rules 3 June 15th 04 02:01 PM
Why not use the F-22 to replace the F/A-18 and F-14? Tony Naval Aviation 290 March 7th 04 07:58 PM
Why not use the F-22 to replace the F/A-18 and F-14? Guy Alcala Military Aviation 265 March 7th 04 09:28 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.