![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tom Conner" wrote in message ink.net... "Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATcox.net wrote in message ... Ask your self this. Would you if it were legal allow your son to be trained in nothing but the Kiwi and then solo? Who has ever advocated flying solo after only sim training? The military makes extensive use of simulators and even they do not do that. The point is the sim trained student will probably solo sooner and fly better than the non-sim student. http://www.aopa.org/pilot/features/future0004.html?PF Hi Tom; Reference; "PCATDs?which, as far as Hampton is concerned, include both FAA-certified PCATDs and off-the-shelf products like Microsoft Flight Simulator?are restricted to teaching cognitive activities such as holding patterns and approach procedures, where they can provide practical experience, practice, and reinforcement. The university relied heavily on PCATDs during the first private/instrument class, and experienced some negative learning. For example, the computer?s performance didn?t always match that of the actual aircraft, especially during slow flight and stalls. Also, if the monitor isn?t properly sized and positioned, it can lead to poor scanning habits." There is a key paragraph in this report that hints toward a most important aspect in the use of desktop simulators in flight training; that being the fact that they can not at this point in time duplicate the actual control pressures required in the real airplane. The actual physical cues involved in flying a specific actual aircraft are considered as critical factors for the pre-solo student and must be experienced. The input from the desk top simulator of familiarization with control DIRECTION is fine and should be considered a training asset up to a point. That point is when the beginning student must start the process of learning control PRESSURES. Although there is reason to believe that this technology may be forthcoming down the line, it is still the opinion of many QUALIFIED instructors in the training community (myself included) that because of this single factor involving the familiarization with control PRESSURES in the aircraft being used for the instruction, the use of desk tops between the period spanning the first hour of dual through the first solo should be discouraged. The periods both before and after this period is where the desktops can be quite useful and complimentary to the training environment. Addendum; if Mxmanic underposts this reply, please excuse my not dealing with it directly. If you or anyone else on the forum would like to discuss this issue with me, please post freely and I'll be most happy to answer. Thank you Dudley Henriques Flight Instructor Retired [MVP] For Microsoft Flight Simulator |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
FLIGHT SIMULATOR X DELUXE 2006-2007 (SIMULATION) 1DVD,Microsoft Flight Simulator 2004, and Addons, FLITESTAR V8.51 - JEPPESEN, MapInfo StreetPro U.S.A. [11 CDs], Rand McNally StreetFinder & TripMaker Deluxe 2004 [3 CDs], other | T.E.L. | Simulators | 0 | October 14th 06 09:08 PM |
CRS: V-22 Osprey Tilt-Rotor Aircraft | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | August 30th 06 02:11 PM |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
Washington DC airspace closing for good? | tony roberts | Piloting | 153 | August 11th 05 12:56 AM |