![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why doesn't the SSA get together with AOPA and the FAA and get this
implimented nation wide. This would be a benefit everywhere. Mike Schumann wrote in message ups.com... Also any other XPDR equipped pilots here in the Rocky Mountain area please weigh in on the subject. The unique transponder codes made available by Reno Approach Control/Tower, (local ATC folks), have been in use for quite some time. I suspect that Carl Harold knows the history behind it. In order to get something like that going, you will need to get one, preferably all the local clubs in the Denver area together and discuss this with both the Denver Approach Control/tower and the Denver ARTCC located in Longmont CO. Being feds, they are most likely not interested in entering into what is called a "Letter of Agreement", much like the one you have for your wave window. You will need to get help from the folks at Reno Approach who helped set all this up. One of the ways to approach your local ATC types is to SHOW them what has been accomplished in Reno. Just talking about it won't cut it, trust me on this. Before you set up a meeting with them, you will need to have copies of all that has been done in the Reno area along with you. The approach control will have to get the local Air Route Traffic Control Center in Longmont to go along with the program, much the same as Reno Approach did with the Oakland ARTCC. I think the tact you will have to take is that the camel already has it's nose under the tent, so you ATC might as well let the rest of it in. Good luck. Zulu -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Schumann" wrote in message .. . Why doesn't the SSA get together with AOPA and the FAA and get this implimented nation wide. This would be a benefit everywhere. Mike Schumann Mike, No offense, but that's really a silly question! (grin) The reason we do not have a single discrete, nation wide transponder code is 'cause that would make too much sense. This is the sort of thing that gets way-laid in bureaucratic red tape forever. Oh, and they will also probably answer that there are not enough transponder codes available as it is, so they can ill afford to assign gliders one (as is done at Reno ATC). I attended the NTSB's Minden meeting after the jet vs. glider mid air. I asked about a single code for gliders and was told it was apparently requested years ago by the SSA. They have also requested an exemption from the "always on" transponder rule for gliders - - no movement on either, that I've heard. I also suggested streamlining the xponder installation and extra battery installation approval requirements for gliders (as they did for shoulder harnesses for classic aircraft over a decade ago). all the best, bumper |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to get maximum height on a winch launch? | Dan G | Soaring | 38 | December 22nd 16 12:29 AM |
Sport Pilot - School Won't Offer | Gary G | Piloting | 38 | February 16th 05 10:41 AM |
Has a glider ever been found using the transponder radar track? | Eric Greenwell | Soaring | 14 | February 3rd 05 02:41 PM |
More on transponder petition | Ian Cant | Soaring | 1 | February 27th 04 06:37 PM |
Restricting Glider Ops at Public Arpt. | rjciii | Soaring | 36 | August 25th 03 04:50 PM |