![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Mxsmanic wrote: Gary writes: No, you aren't. Yes, I am. Only if you are playing with your simulator on a laptop, aboard a commercial flight. If you are playing with your simulator while sitting on the ground, you aren't in flight. You are only pretending to be. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Mxsmanic wrote: A Guy Called Tyketto writes: You would be wrong again. If there were a security issue, it would have been reported to them and they would have either a) taken the whole thing down, or b) mentioned that there was a security issue and have fixed it. A security issue on the client system was what I had in mind. Since neither has happened, your hypothesis, like your logic, is flawed. I suggest you ask for clarification before drawing conclusions. It saves time and face. Why should I have to ask you for clarifications? You're the one making the statement, and therefore should have your facts lined up to support your claim. It isn't up to us to prove you wrong; you have to prove yourself right. You failed to back up your claim. Not my problem. There has never been a virus created in Linux. Never is a strong word. Never is a strong, solid word. Google around for it; over the past 16 years, there has not been one virus targeted for the Linux platform. If you used it, you would have known that. I run UNIX, the operating system that Linux was intended to imitate. I have had worm issues with UNIX. Worms are not, nor have ever been, a virus. If you've used Unix, and admin such a machine, you would know that as well. Next time, add some seasonings to your foot. It'll taste better in your mouth. I don't understand this reference. Open mouth. Insert foot. Repeat, as you've done that many times in this newsgroup. I never said you didn't need charts in the aircraft. I never said that I didn't plan flights in advance. But the makings of a good pilot start at the preplanning stage. as PIC, you should know where you are going, how to get there, what charts to use, and how to fly them. If you don't, and you are looking for the charts inflight because you don't have them, you're screwed. Yes. ****poor planning on your part should not and does not constitute an emergency on ATC's part. Anything that endangers your flight or other flights is a potential emergency, irrespective of its cause. Agreed. ****poor planning, including lack of charts for the area you are flying in, especially midflight is an emergency. In this case, that emergency could have been entirely avoided, if you had your charts prior to departing, let alone stepping into the cockpit. YOU are PIC. YOU are responsible for being prepared, not anyone else. If you can't, don't fly. I'm aware of this, but thank you for pointing it out. Good. You actually may be learning something. True, plans can change. But that does not mean that you should be totally void of charts, which you claimed to have been, as you had said it would be too late to look them up as you would already be en route. I'm not sure I follow your reasoning. Nope.. I was wrong. Okay.. I guess I have to play dumb and put it simple for you. Don't leave; don't walk towards a plane; do not even breathe in the direction of an airplane until you have the charts on hand for where you're departing from, and where you are arriving at. Want a good reason? he http://www.liveatc.net/forums/index....ic,2147.0.html You have to be logged in to hear the clip, but that is a damn good reason to have those with you prior to doing a damn thing. The Dilbert Rule is definitely starting to apply to you. I'm not familiar with the Dilbert Rule. Do you have a FAR reference? I have a Dilbert reference. To quote Dogbert, which I should take his advice now: "Never argue with an idiot. They'll drop you down to their level, and beat you with experience." It would be impossible for you to get a pilot's license here. You don't have the makings of one, nor the calibre to be one. I'm not sure where "here" is, but I suspect I'd be an excellent pilot. See above. You don't have the calibre for it. Stick to driving. Better yet, take the bus. It'll be safer for the rest of us. BL. - -- Brad Littlejohn | Email: Unix Systems Administrator, | Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! ![]() PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFmvRDyBkZmuMZ8L8RAgY1AJ0RVm2dcxA/nGkw68MqTiaOknkJ/wCg3qwX Xs2Mo3CBscwTT5ghYX5qRII= =0toc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A Guy Called Tyketto writes:
Okay.. I guess I have to play dumb ... Well done! "Never argue with an idiot. They'll drop you down to their level, and beat you with experience." I have no quarrel with that. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gary writes:
Only if you are playing with your simulator on a laptop, aboard a commercial flight. If you are playing with your simulator while sitting on the ground, you aren't in flight. You are only pretending to be. I think that depends on the definition of flight. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recently, Mxsmanic posted:
A Guy Called Tyketto writes: Then it is too late. You should ALWAYS (sim and real world) do your chartfinding and flight planning BEFORE you jump in the plane. All of that is on the ground. Then why do you need charts in the aircraft? Is this a serious question, or are you "calling his bluff"? Do you really think that planning before the flight somehow obviates the need to carry the charts on which you've planned? Plans can change, also. Yet another good reason to carry the charts with you. Even so, good flight planning would incorporate at least some of the likely changes/alternatives to one's original intention. Neil |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Neil Gould writes:
Is this a serious question, or are you "calling his bluff"? It is a serious question. Do you really think that planning before the flight somehow obviates the need to carry the charts on which you've planned? Someone seemed to wish to imply that; I found that puzzling and tried to verify. Yet another good reason to carry the charts with you. Even so, good flight planning would incorporate at least some of the likely changes/alternatives to one's original intention. Yes. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FSDO enforcement- GPS before effective date - which date to put in Aircraft Log for Part 43? | Ron A. | Instrument Flight Rules | 18 | March 15th 06 02:30 PM |
Date of effect now 1 April 2004 for revised IGC-approval for certain legacy types of GNSS flight recorder | Ian Strachan | Soaring | 56 | December 2nd 03 08:08 AM |