![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tony" wrote in message ups.com... There is no requirement to hold a constant level of acceleration or level flight. The requirement is simply that the weight vector be into the seat at 1 G. It is possible to take the airplane through a 360 roll about its axis doing this, so such a flight pattern would NOT be noticed by a blindfolded with hearing blocked PX. I do appreciate the airplane will not end the manouver straight and level and will not have its initial heading. Recovering those values may be physically impossible -- it will be going down pretty fast, and I can't imagine a flight path that take the airplane back to S&L without inducing more than 1 G on the cockpit. The question I have is, does an airplane exist that has the control authority to fly such a roll? IF you allow me to start with the aircraft in a 20 degree climb, it is possible, and I do it quite frequently in the RV-6. Without letting me start in a climb or end in a dive, it isn't possible, because keeping one "G" on the seat when you're inverted means the airplane is accelerating downward at 2 G's - the gravity induced one and the one you're using to keep your butt in the seat. You've gotta make up for that downward acceleration somewhere, and the easy way is to start in a climb or end in a dive... I routinely do 1.25 G rolls, including the pull-up before the roll and the pull-up after the roll, which are what add the extra .25 G. Alternately, I can skip either of the pull-ups, but that means I need to pull twice as hard (or twice as long) on the other end of the roll. KB KB |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
john smith writes:
Water, not fruit juice. It looked yellow, as I recall. Think.... why would someone deliberately pour a stickey substance onto their instument panel/engine control cluster if there was risk of spilling it into said instruments/controls? Perhaps there was no risk. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The notion of starting in a climb solves a lot of problems, I had not
thought of that, And if you start S&L and fast, you can enter the climb while in a controlled deceleration, too, keeping that 1 G component down relative to the seat, too. How fast do you have to enter, and how long does the roll take? Thanks! On Jan 2, 8:10 pm, "Kyle Boatright" wrote: "Tony" wrote in oglegroups.com... There is no requirement to hold a constant level of acceleration or level flight. The requirement is simply that the weight vector be into the seat at 1 G. It is possible to take the airplane through a 360 roll about its axis doing this, so such a flight pattern would NOT be noticed by a blindfolded with hearing blocked PX. I do appreciate the airplane will not end the manouver straight and level and will not have its initial heading. Recovering those values may be physically impossible -- it will be going down pretty fast, and I can't imagine a flight path that take the airplane back to S&L without inducing more than 1 G on the cockpit. The question I have is, does an airplane exist that has the control authority to fly such a roll?IF you allow me to start with the aircraft in a 20 degree climb, it is possible, and I do it quite frequently in the RV-6. Without letting me start in a climb or end in a dive, it isn't possible, because keeping one "G" on the seat when you're inverted means the airplane is accelerating downward at 2 G's - the gravity induced one and the one you're using to keep your butt in the seat. You've gotta make up for that downward acceleration somewhere, and the easy way is to start in a climb or end in a dive... I routinely do 1.25 G rolls, including the pull-up before the roll and the pull-up after the roll, which are what add the extra .25 G. Alternately, I can skip either of the pull-ups, but that means I need to pull twice as hard (or twice as long) on the other end of the roll. KB KB |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tony" wrote in message
ups.com... About a year ago there was a spirited discussion about maintaining a 1 G 'straight into the seat' force while doing a roll (let's define a roll as rotating the airplane, somehow, 360 degrees around its axis with respect to the horizon). As I rmember the analysis, if you have enough control authority if you accelerate downward at 1 G and pull hard enough while doing a coordinated roll you can do just that. A blindfolded passenger would know the roll happened. Are there any skilled sim players out there who can do this? I'm especially interested in what airplanes have enough (simulated) control authority to pull it off. It's not possible with my current setup. Maybe someone else will have better luck. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tony" wrote in message oups.com... The notion of starting in a climb solves a lot of problems, I had not thought of that, And if you start S&L and fast, you can enter the climb while in a controlled deceleration, too, keeping that 1 G component down relative to the seat, too. How fast do you have to enter, and how long does the roll take? Thanks! Anywhere from 100 to 170 knots. The roll probably takes 4-5 seconds, but I don't have the skill level to perform a roll and time it simultaneously. KB |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"john smith" wrote in message
... Mxsmanic wrote: I've seen Bob Hoover demonstrate this by pouring fruit juice into a cup during a barrel roll. Others have probably done the same thing. Water, not fruit juice. Think.... why would someone deliberately pour a stickey substance onto their instument panel/engine control cluster if there was risk of spilling it into said instruments/controls? It was iced tea. BTW, Avflash recently provided a link to a YouTube video of it: http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archive...ll.html#194120 |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kyle, if the roll is completed in 4 seconds, that means the airplane
will be 'falling' about 75 knots after 360 degrees. Doesn't that mean if you start the roll with a vertical velocity of 75 kts you'll come out with a zero vertical speed component? With a 150 kt airspeed, that means starting the roll with a 30 degree climb. Interesting idea! Thanks On Jan 2, 10:21 pm, "Kyle Boatright" wrote: "Tony" wrote in ooglegroups.com... The notion of starting in a climb solves a lot of problems, I had not thought of that, And if you start S&L and fast, you can enter the climb while in a controlled deceleration, too, keeping that 1 G component down relative to the seat, too. How fast do you have to enter, and how long does the roll take? Thanks!Anywhere from 100 to 170 knots. The roll probably takes 4-5 seconds, but I don't have the skill level to perform a roll and time it simultaneously. KB |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Duncan writes:
Breaking both wings off in the simulator is also a very safe maneuver isn't it? No, it causes the aircraft to crash. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | General Aviation | 3 | December 23rd 03 08:53 PM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | October 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | September 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | August 1st 03 07:27 AM |