![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chief McGee wrote:
Since we are discussing designs: http://www.vortechonline.com/aw95/ I'd like to see if they have anything to back up this statement in the FAQ. "However, a well-constructed A/W 95 will typically have a high re-sale value—if you ever decide to sell it!" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
While the AW95 is a viable hop around the local patch implement once
completed is more of a build to sublimate or educate rather than recreate. Same with the original Adams-Wilson except that all current homebuilt designs marketed as plans or kits have a direct linage to the Adams-Wilson design . Although much evolved Exception to the Mosquito though as the design is so far removed in concept from the A/W. "Chief McGee" wrote in message news:SIRoh.1124026$084.597266@attbi_s22... Since we are discussing designs: http://www.vortechonline.com/aw95/ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
While the AW95 is a viable hop around the local patch implement once
completed is more of a build to sublimate or educate rather than recreate. Same with the original Adams-Wilson except that all current homebuilt designs marketed as plans or kits have a direct linage to the Adams-Wilson design . Although much evolved This brings up an old question that I have wondered about, and may be supplying a partial answer. But I really am curious: It seems that all of the homebuild helicopter designs that I have ever seen, both kit and plans, have a very small main rotor diameter--around 20 feet. It seems as though a larger diameter, maybe arund 30 feet, would require much less power and would allow much more economical engines to be used--possibly with nearly the same total weight. After all, the weight of the main rotor ad the tail boom should not be a very large portion of the gross weight of the helicopter. The only reasons that presently occur to me a 1 The first one was that way, and "new" designs are incremental 2 There was/is a design goal to store the craft in a one car garage 3 That is the smallest for with sufficient power is readily available Is there something I missed, which should have been obvious? Peter (I am not trolling, I am just baffled) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Medstar chopper crashed in DC yesterday | Flyingmonk | Piloting | 0 | May 31st 06 01:39 PM |
Chopper crash | [email protected] | Rotorcraft | 34 | May 27th 06 11:07 AM |
OPINIONS: THE SOLUTION | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 4 | January 7th 04 10:43 PM |
Rallye/Koliber AD's and opinions | R. Wubben | Owning | 2 | October 16th 03 05:39 AM |
Rallye/Koliber AD's and opinions | R. Wubben | Piloting | 2 | October 16th 03 05:39 AM |