If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Can gliders and powered aircraft co-exist on the same runway?
Franconia NH, 1B5.
Is that where the gliders come from that see in the Nashua area? Probably not, I suspect that it is a long way, through the notch, from Fanconia to Nashua. And I bet it would seem even longer on the return trip. -ash Cthulhu in 2007! Why wait for nature? the Flight School at Daniel Webster College in Nashua has some "motor gliders" for part of their syllabus There are a lot of Glider Clubs and fields just over the line in Massachusetts. Those clubs do use Franconia in the summer. I had my first glider ride at Franconia, while I was a student at DWC. BT NEAI (DWC) Alumn |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Can gliders and powered aircraft co-exist on the same runway?
Ron Lee wrote:
Can anyone identify and airport where gliders and powered aircraft use the same runway? Do they use opposite traffic patterns? Any other operational issues? Hollister, CA (3O7)has crossing runways (31-13, 06-24). Fixed wing (powered and gliders) use left traffic, helicopters use right traffic. Bit of a pain waiting for glider hookup, which takes place on the runway - causes periodic 2 minute delays. When winds are calm, powered use 31, gliders use 24. In the afternoon when the west winds pick up, everyone uses 24 including the turbine powered air tankers when landing - although they always use the 6000 ft 31 for takeoff when loaded. Deane Judd Cessna R172K |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Can gliders and powered aircraft co-exist on the same runway?
Doug Spencer wrote: On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 04:14:45 GMT Can anyone identify and airport where gliders and powered aircraft use the same runway? Do they use opposite traffic patterns? Any other operational issues? At Santa Ynez, CA (IZA) the gliders use a long grass/dirt overrun area on the east end of runway 8/26. The wind is usually from the west, so gliders taking off under tow do interfere with powered traffic. Landing both they and their towplanes usually stop short of the runway threshold. IIRC they fly a right hand pattern, whereas powered traffic uses left hand. The gliding and powered operations seem to coexist without much problem - but I, for one, never liked the distractions of aircraft and people on the ground near the runway threshold. Once, long ago, the wind was from the East, and I was about to take off on runway 8. Just before taxiing into position a glider appeared (unannounced) making a downwind landing. He landed long, and rolled down the remaining runway, past my nose and into the grass at the far end. I was not amused. David Johnson |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Can gliders and powered aircraft co-exist on the same runway?
The SAME runway? I think you are asking for trouble. A glider cannot do
a go around. There are lots of ways for things to go bad in this scenario, but I think the most frequent is a plane taking off does not see an incoming glider and takes the runway. The glider cannot do a go around and an accident ensues. And probably several temper tantrums for every accident. Maybe the glider will land safely but it still will anger everyone involved. And don't count on radios fixing this. Neither planes nor gliders are required to have radios. The gliders really do need a seperate runway just for them. Anything else is just asking for trouble. Ron Lee wrote: Can anyone identify and airport where gliders and powered aircraft use the same runway? Do they use opposite traffic patterns? Any other operational issues? Ron Lee |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Can gliders and powered aircraft co-exist on the same runway?
Doug, a "properly trained" glider pilot will always have an alternate
landing area available just in case some one blocks the runway while he is in the traffic pattern. I will agree that such incursions onto the runway at too low an altitude to effect a divert to the alternate landing area may result in an accident. In that instance the offending pilot, whether power or glider, will be shot at sunset if not sooner so as to be a lesson to other pilots that do not know how to use their god given calibrated Mk-1 Eyeballs. If the landing glider pilot is injured in the accident, his glider pilot flying mates are empowered to execute the offender. We do "adjust" the punishment with the full knowledge that "everyone makes mistakes", we need to train properly to handle those that "always make mistakes". Yes it is nice to have a separate parallel runway, we do, and we still have problems with runway incursion. Mostly by transients that do not know what an "airfield directory is" or even how to look up the runway numbers or the fact that there are parallel runways or even gliders in the area, or the jump zone, or the designated acrobatic box. The runway can be used by anyone, it is not a "glider only runway". BT "Doug" wrote in message oups.com... The SAME runway? I think you are asking for trouble. A glider cannot do a go around. There are lots of ways for things to go bad in this scenario, but I think the most frequent is a plane taking off does not see an incoming glider and takes the runway. The glider cannot do a go around and an accident ensues. And probably several temper tantrums for every accident. Maybe the glider will land safely but it still will anger everyone involved. And don't count on radios fixing this. Neither planes nor gliders are required to have radios. The gliders really do need a seperate runway just for them. Anything else is just asking for trouble. Ron Lee wrote: Can anyone identify and airport where gliders and powered aircraft use the same runway? Do they use opposite traffic patterns? Any other operational issues? Ron Lee |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Can gliders and powered aircraft co-exist on the same runway?
Yeah, nice airport crowd. Make a mistake and you are "shot". And you
are advocating this type of operation? Why not make a design that MINIMIZES conflict, not maximizes them? Get serious. YOUR airport has a seperate runway for gliders. I wonder why? BT wrote: Doug, a "properly trained" glider pilot will always have an alternate landing area available just in case some one blocks the runway while he is in the traffic pattern. I will agree that such incursions onto the runway at too low an altitude to effect a divert to the alternate landing area may result in an accident. In that instance the offending pilot, whether power or glider, will be shot at sunset if not sooner so as to be a lesson to other pilots that do not know how to use their god given calibrated Mk-1 Eyeballs. If the landing glider pilot is injured in the accident, his glider pilot flying mates are empowered to execute the offender. We do "adjust" the punishment with the full knowledge that "everyone makes mistakes", we need to train properly to handle those that "always make mistakes". Yes it is nice to have a separate parallel runway, we do, and we still have problems with runway incursion. Mostly by transients that do not know what an "airfield directory is" or even how to look up the runway numbers or the fact that there are parallel runways or even gliders in the area, or the jump zone, or the designated acrobatic box. The runway can be used by anyone, it is not a "glider only runway". BT "Doug" wrote in message oups.com... The SAME runway? I think you are asking for trouble. A glider cannot do a go around. There are lots of ways for things to go bad in this scenario, but I think the most frequent is a plane taking off does not see an incoming glider and takes the runway. The glider cannot do a go around and an accident ensues. And probably several temper tantrums for every accident. Maybe the glider will land safely but it still will anger everyone involved. And don't count on radios fixing this. Neither planes nor gliders are required to have radios. The gliders really do need a seperate runway just for them. Anything else is just asking for trouble. Ron Lee wrote: Can anyone identify and airport where gliders and powered aircraft use the same runway? Do they use opposite traffic patterns? Any other operational issues? Ron Lee |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Can gliders and powered aircraft co-exist on the same runway?
Generally the glider traffic uses opposite traffic from the power
traffic (left/right). We operate single runway, power and glider operations at Salida, Colorado, Buena Vista, Colorado, Fremont County (Cannon City), Colorado and FNL (Fort Collins/Loveland), Colorado. We will NEVER be able to train the power pilots about glider operations, so it requires that the glider pilots, tow pilots and glider ground crew are always watching, have a plan and an alternate plan. I've often landed on the main runway, then chosen my place (between the runway lights) and taxied off the runway into the grass to clear the runway because I knew the power pilot behind me was clueless. Yes, I have 6 times more power time than glider time... with 6000 hours total time. It just takes safety awareness and PLANNING! Ron Lee wrote: Can anyone identify and airport where gliders and powered aircraft use the same runway? Do they use opposite traffic patterns? Any other operational issues? Ron Lee Best regards, Jer/ "Flight instruction and mountain flying are my vocations!" -- Jer/ (Slash) Eberhard, Mountain Flying Aviation, LTD, Ft Collins, CO CELL 970 231-6325 EMAIL jer at frii.com http://users.frii.com/jer/ C-206 N9513G, CFII Airplane&Glider FAA-DEN Aviation Safety Counselor CAP-CO Mission&Aircraft CheckPilot BM218 HAM N0FZD 247 Young Eagles! |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Can gliders and powered aircraft co-exist on the same runway?
"Doug" wrote in message oups.com... Yeah, nice airport crowd. Make a mistake and you are "shot". And you are advocating this type of operation? Why not make a design that MINIMIZES conflict, not maximizes them? Get serious. YOUR airport has a seperate runway for gliders. I wonder why? Doug, obviously you did not catch my "tongue in cheek". But yes, we do have serious conversations with those that transgress and we have politely not renewed some club members based on their flying inabilities. Short of using two different airports separated by miles, Parallel design is the safest that minimizes conflict. We run parallel operations, we have left and right traffic patterns, we talk on the radio and we train everyone that radios fail. We have 3 power flying schools at neighboring airports that come here for touch and go practice and first solo operations, plus 2 nearby helicopter schools that use our airport for training, two Jump Businesses on airport and two Commercial Glider "joy ride" operations on the field in addition to our club operations. Plus the local Acro club has the designated Acro Box just outside and above the west downwind, we use it too, for spin training. Everything works just fine, What we cannot protect against is the transient that never checks NOTAMs and never looks at an A/FD. We have two runways because the club was here on a dirt strip and we hauled in our own fuel. When the county came in to "upgrade", we were able to convince them the wise and safe aspects of building a second runway. The second runway has no lights, is 60ft wide and 3500ft long with 600ft gravel under/over runs at each end, and the infield from the runway to the taxiway is bladed smooth to the same elevation as the paved portions. BT |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Can gliders and powered aircraft co-exist on the same runway?
At my airport, KBZN, we have lots of different traffic - maybe a dozen
airline flights/day, lots of bizjets and everything else including flight training, Cubs, aerobatics, glider and parachutes. We have 3 runways, 12-30 at 9kft long, 11-29 sod parallel to the main, and 3-21 at 3kft crossing 12-30 near the east end. We also have a contract control tower. Normally, glider traffic uses the 3-21 runway, launching from 3 and landing 21. If the winds get too strong to support this, the gliders usually pack it in for the day. The guys out ridge running figure out something when they arrive - usually singly. This almost always works out ok. But.....there are a bunch of hangars around 3-21 and the planes based there like to use 3-21 also. Once, I was in the pattern to land my glider on 21 when a guy in a 30's era biplane called tower to takeoff on runway 3. Tower cleared him into "position and hold" which he did. Meanwhile, I'm base turning final for 21 at about 200 ft. Obviously, tower forgot about me. Tower then clears him to takeoff into my face, which he did. Yikes! Too late to talk with tower about it, I did a quick 180 then a 90 to land on 30 and coasted to a stop hundreds of feet from a taxiway. Of course, this shut down the airport for about five minutes while I dragged my glider off without help. Would have been nice if the biplane guy had better SA. Would have been nice if tower could have heard me better. I quickly got a much better radio installed in the glider. But hey, it usually works pretty well. But you need a backup plan K l e i n wrote: Generally the glider traffic uses opposite traffic from the power traffic (left/right). We operate single runway, power and glider operations at Salida, Colorado, Buena Vista, Colorado, Fremont County (Cannon City), Colorado and FNL (Fort Collins/Loveland), Colorado. We will NEVER be able to train the power pilots about glider operations, so it requires that the glider pilots, tow pilots and glider ground crew are always watching, have a plan and an alternate plan. I've often landed on the main runway, then chosen my place (between the runway lights) and taxied off the runway into the grass to clear the runway because I knew the power pilot behind me was clueless. Yes, I have 6 times more power time than glider time... with 6000 hours total time. It just takes safety awareness and PLANNING! Ron Lee wrote: Can anyone identify and airport where gliders and powered aircraft use the same runway? Do they use opposite traffic patterns? Any other operational issues? Ron Lee Best regards, Jer/ "Flight instruction and mountain flying are my vocations!" -- Jer/ (Slash) Eberhard, Mountain Flying Aviation, LTD, Ft Collins, CO CELL 970 231-6325 EMAIL jer at frii.com http://users.frii.com/jer/ C-206 N9513G, CFII Airplane&Glider FAA-DEN Aviation Safety Counselor CAP-CO Mission&Aircraft CheckPilot BM218 HAM N0FZD 247 Young Eagles! |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hawker vs. Glider Midair - with photo! | Larry Dighera | Soaring | 72 | September 6th 06 02:03 PM |
Hawker vs. Glider Midair - with photo! | Larry Dighera | Soaring | 5 | September 1st 06 07:20 PM |
NTSB: USAF included? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 10 | September 11th 05 10:33 AM |
Powered gliders = powered aircraft for 91.205 | Mark James Boyd | Soaring | 2 | December 12th 04 03:28 AM |
California Tax exemption - gone after Oct 1st | Limus A. | Soaring | 1 | August 6th 04 04:46 PM |