![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Thomas Borchert wrote: Kev, The company line is that, while they tried to design to avoid spins, the chute is the answer for loss of control: That's not only the company line. The chute is the basis for spin certification both for the FAA and (as you pointed out) the EASA, accepted as an alternate method. It seems to work pretty well, too. I did run across one quote from the Cirrus president, who said he "wished they'd demonstrated a normal spin recovery to the FAA". That's interesting, because it sounds like it's at least possible. Cheers, Kev |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why does a prop ice up so apparently readily? | Mike Rapoport | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | November 8th 05 02:52 PM |
Ivo Prop on O-320 | Dave S | Home Built | 14 | October 15th 04 03:04 AM |
Prop Pitch Question | Eugene Wendland | Home Built | 2 | April 25th 04 03:22 AM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |