A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

NRC decides nuclear plants are already safe from airplane attacks



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 30th 07, 02:22 AM posted to rec.travel.air,rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default NRC decides nuclear plants are already safe from airplane attacks

See

http://us.cnn.com/2007/US/01/29/reac...ity/index.html

I agree with the NRC. Nuclear plants are designed to readily
withstand far worse than the impact of an aircraft, such as internal
steam explosions. Aircraft are light and fragile, and would simply
crumple uselessly if they hit a containment building or cooling tower
(and cooling towers aren't terribly critical). The same is true of
aircraft hitting structures like dams: if the dam can resist a
bazillion tons of water pressing against it 24 hours a day, an
aircraft hitting it would be like a fly against Mount Shasta.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #2  
Old January 30th 07, 01:38 PM posted to rec.travel.air,rec.aviation.piloting
Stubby
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 117
Default NRC decides nuclear plants are already safe from airplane attacks

There is a video clip on the web showing a test: A fully loaded and
fueld F-4 fighter purposely crashed into a power plant shell. As I
recall it took out a 4.5" chunk of concrete.


Mxsmanic wrote:
See

http://us.cnn.com/2007/US/01/29/reac...ity/index.html

I agree with the NRC. Nuclear plants are designed to readily
withstand far worse than the impact of an aircraft, such as internal
steam explosions. Aircraft are light and fragile, and would simply
crumple uselessly if they hit a containment building or cooling tower
(and cooling towers aren't terribly critical). The same is true of
aircraft hitting structures like dams: if the dam can resist a
bazillion tons of water pressing against it 24 hours a day, an
aircraft hitting it would be like a fly against Mount Shasta.

  #3  
Old January 30th 07, 05:10 PM posted to rec.travel.air,rec.aviation.piloting
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,749
Default NRC decides nuclear plants are already safe from airplane attacks

Mxsmanic,

I agree with the NRC.


Thank god! If you as the expert on anything agrees, I guess we're safe.
I feel so much better.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #4  
Old January 30th 07, 06:56 PM posted to rec.travel.air,rec.aviation.piloting
Mike Hunt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 47
Default NRC decides nuclear plants are already safe from airplane attacks

Stubby wrote:

There is a video clip on the web showing a test: A fully loaded and
fueld F-4 fighter purposely crashed into a power plant shell. As I
recall it took out a 4.5" chunk of concrete.


Man, that pilot must have been brave, or stupid.

  #5  
Old January 30th 07, 06:57 PM posted to rec.travel.air,rec.aviation.piloting
Mike Hunt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 47
Default NRC decides nuclear plants are already safe from airplane attacks

Thomas Borchert wrote:

Mxsmanic,


I agree with the NRC.



Thank god! If you as the expert on anything agrees, I guess we're safe.
I feel so much better.


The UNRC (Ukraine NRC) on the other hand, is a different story.
  #6  
Old January 30th 07, 07:37 PM posted to rec.travel.air,rec.aviation.piloting
Viperdoc[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 243
Default NRC decides nuclear plants are already safe from airplane attacks

Anthony is not an expert on anything- in his own mind he is an expert on
everything.


  #7  
Old February 1st 07, 09:33 AM posted to rec.travel.air,rec.aviation.piloting
Alan Street
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default NRC decides nuclear plants are already safe from airplane attacks

In article , Mike Hunt
postmaster@localhost wrote:

Stubby wrote:

There is a video clip on the web showing a test: A fully loaded and
fueld F-4 fighter purposely crashed into a power plant shell. As I
recall it took out a 4.5" chunk of concrete.


Man, that pilot must have been brave, or stupid.


"Crash test dummy" takes on a whole new meaning
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Iran's nuclear program Thelasian Military Aviation 107 August 31st 04 06:35 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 April 5th 04 03:04 PM
Hiroshima/Nagasaki vs conventional B-17 bombing zxcv Military Aviation 55 April 4th 04 07:05 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 2 February 2nd 04 11:41 PM
Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other magnificent technological achievements me Military Aviation 146 January 15th 04 10:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.