![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
See
http://us.cnn.com/2007/US/01/29/reac...ity/index.html I agree with the NRC. Nuclear plants are designed to readily withstand far worse than the impact of an aircraft, such as internal steam explosions. Aircraft are light and fragile, and would simply crumple uselessly if they hit a containment building or cooling tower (and cooling towers aren't terribly critical). The same is true of aircraft hitting structures like dams: if the dam can resist a bazillion tons of water pressing against it 24 hours a day, an aircraft hitting it would be like a fly against Mount Shasta. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is a video clip on the web showing a test: A fully loaded and
fueld F-4 fighter purposely crashed into a power plant shell. As I recall it took out a 4.5" chunk of concrete. Mxsmanic wrote: See http://us.cnn.com/2007/US/01/29/reac...ity/index.html I agree with the NRC. Nuclear plants are designed to readily withstand far worse than the impact of an aircraft, such as internal steam explosions. Aircraft are light and fragile, and would simply crumple uselessly if they hit a containment building or cooling tower (and cooling towers aren't terribly critical). The same is true of aircraft hitting structures like dams: if the dam can resist a bazillion tons of water pressing against it 24 hours a day, an aircraft hitting it would be like a fly against Mount Shasta. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic,
I agree with the NRC. Thank god! If you as the expert on anything agrees, I guess we're safe. I feel so much better. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stubby wrote:
There is a video clip on the web showing a test: A fully loaded and fueld F-4 fighter purposely crashed into a power plant shell. As I recall it took out a 4.5" chunk of concrete. Man, that pilot must have been brave, or stupid. ![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thomas Borchert wrote:
Mxsmanic, I agree with the NRC. Thank god! If you as the expert on anything agrees, I guess we're safe. I feel so much better. The UNRC (Ukraine NRC) on the other hand, is a different story. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anthony is not an expert on anything- in his own mind he is an expert on
everything. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Mike Hunt
postmaster@localhost wrote: Stubby wrote: There is a video clip on the web showing a test: A fully loaded and fueld F-4 fighter purposely crashed into a power plant shell. As I recall it took out a 4.5" chunk of concrete. Man, that pilot must have been brave, or stupid. ![]() "Crash test dummy" takes on a whole new meaning |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Iran's nuclear program | Thelasian | Military Aviation | 107 | August 31st 04 06:35 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | April 5th 04 03:04 PM |
Hiroshima/Nagasaki vs conventional B-17 bombing | zxcv | Military Aviation | 55 | April 4th 04 07:05 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 2 | February 2nd 04 11:41 PM |
Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other magnificent technological achievements | me | Military Aviation | 146 | January 15th 04 10:13 PM |