![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 11:51:34 GMT, "xerj" wrote:
I was trying to explain to a non-pilot why increased power is required with Increased power is not needed and not normally obtainable at higher altitude with a normally aspirated engine. It takes less power to maintain speed at altitude compared to lower. If you just maintain power you go faster than you do down lower. altitude. She said "isn't the air thinner up there so there isn't as much resistance?" I said "yes, but the plane needs to fly fast enough for the air over the wings to feel like it does down low. So the speed required goes up you get higher. More speed need more power." This didn't really do the trick. Can someone think of a better way of putting it without resorting to mathematics and an explanation of IAS and TAS? "I think" you are confusing the difference between IAS and TAS at altitude versus power at altitude, or as Dennis already suggested, throttle position compared to power. TIA Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Increased power is not needed and not normally obtainable at higher
altitude with a normally aspirated engine. It takes less power to maintain speed at altitude compared to lower. If you just maintain power you go faster than you do down lower. TAS most definitely increases. In a round about way, I was talking about IAS. My understanding, and I'm pretty sure of it although I've been told otherwise here, is that to maintain the same IAS (and thus dynamic pressure) at a higher altitude, you need more power. I don't mean throttle position -- for the sake of the argument I am leaving density effects on engine power output aside. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() TAS most definitely increases. In a round about way, I was talking about IAS. My understanding, and I'm pretty sure of it although I've been told otherwise here, is that to maintain the same IAS (and thus dynamic pressure) at a higher altitude, you need more power. X, I hate to sound discouraging, but you may not find an answer here.I looked on two websites and referenced the book Aerodynamics for naval aviators, and they kinda contradicted each other.I think you are looking for a real world answer to a hypothetical situation.The IAS or dynamic pressure on a plane WILL decrease with altitude.Take a look at a typical plane doing 300 KIAS at 10 thousand.The TAS will be within about 40 KTS of this.Now climb up to FL350 and the KIAS will be about 230 with a TAS of about 475 (Roughly). Now you do need more power but the point about IAS is mute (Or hypothetical) because you cant indicate 300 KTS at 350.The part about maintaining the same AOA isnt gonna happen either.I hope someone can explain this better. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
#1 Jet of World War II | Christopher | Military Aviation | 203 | September 1st 03 03:04 AM |
Change in TAS with constant Power and increasing altitude. | Big John | Home Built | 6 | July 13th 03 03:29 PM |