![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
W.J. (Bill) Dean (U.K.). wrote:
The U.K. Air Accidents Investigation Branch accident report on the fatal crash involving a photographer on 9th August 2005 at Husbands Bosworth has now been published. It may be found at http://www.aaib.gov.uk/cms_resources...65%2002-07.pdf . W.J. (Bill) Dean (U.K.). Remove "ic" to reply. My first thought is that competition finishes, as we know them in the UK, will probably have to be altered quite radically. A quote from the report: "[pilots] may have thought that because ultimately they were landing, they were absolved from the obligation to observe Rule 5 whilst they were racing towards the finishing line. However, gliders do not normally approach a glider site at high speed and very low height requiring pop‑up manoeuvres to avoid obstacles outside the airfield boundary. Usually, they land from an approach involving a gradual descent at moderate airspeed, crossing the airfield boundary at a height that does not normally present a risk to spectators or passers-by. Therefore, it is clear that the finishing technique used in this race by many of the competitors did not constitute ‘landing in accordance with normal aviation practice’ (see Rule 5 para (3)(a)(ii )) which automatically exempts pilots from having to observe the ‘500 feet rule’ stipulated in para (2)(b))." The alternative, if such finishes are to be retained, is for an exemption from the UK CAA for each competition, and it seems clear from the report that this would require competition organisers to ensure that spectators could not enter the potential at risk zone, which would be practically impossible at many airfields I know. I'm not a competition pilot, and haven't the nerve to fly a proper competition finish, so wouldn't want to suggest how to change what we currently do. I certainly don't have a view that such finishes are too dangerous to be allowed to continue. However, reading the report is sobering, and suggests to me that we won't be allowed continue as we have been used to. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
New book / close calls / accident prevention / Bob Wander | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | September 11th 06 11:04 PM |
Who's At Fault in UAV/Part91 MAC? | Larry Dighera | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | April 29th 04 03:08 PM |
Accident Statistics: Certified vs. Non-Certified Engines | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 23 | January 18th 04 05:36 PM |
Single-Seat Accident Records (Was BD-5B) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 41 | November 20th 03 05:39 AM |