A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

FAA efficiency



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 10th 07, 08:28 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,477
Default FAA efficiency


"Morgans" wrote in message
...

At what cost, will all of this technology be available?

For guys like Ron Want-a-jaw, and Joe Q Public just want to go for burgers
and breakfast, and smash bugs.

It will likely cost tens of thousands of dollars for each one of these
guys to buy the stuff that would be required. That isn't an option for
most, either.

Shoot, what about the guys that don't even have an electrical system, or a
transponder? Where are they going to fit in?


They sound like the VFR traffic that would continue to provide their own
separation, perhaps aided with a real-time graphical display of surrounding
traffic, if desired.


  #2  
Old February 10th 07, 08:38 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 146
Default FAA efficiency


"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote

They sound like the VFR traffic that would continue to provide their own
separation, perhaps aided with a real-time graphical display of
surrounding traffic, if desired.


What about when they want to go into a class C?
--
Jim in NC

  #3  
Old February 10th 07, 08:57 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,477
Default FAA efficiency


"Morgans" wrote in message
...

What about when they want to go into a class C?


Guys like Ron Want-a-jaw and Joe Q. Public can find places outside of Class
C airspace to go for burgers and breakfast and smash bugs. The guys that
don't even have an electrical system or a transponder are already missing
the equipment required for entry to Class C airspace.


  #4  
Old February 10th 07, 09:23 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 146
Default FAA efficiency


"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
link.net...

"Morgans" wrote in message
...

What about when they want to go into a class C?


Guys like Ron Want-a-jaw and Joe Q. Public can find places outside of
Class C airspace to go for burgers and breakfast and smash bugs. The guys
that don't even have an electrical system or a transponder are already
missing the equipment required for entry to Class C airspace.


True, but if one wants to do the occasional cross country into class C and
has a radio and transponder, they will have to install a bunch of new
technology, costing thousands, right? That sounds like a move in the wrong
direction for GA.
--
Jim in NC

  #5  
Old February 10th 07, 09:32 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,477
Default FAA efficiency


"Morgans" wrote in message
...

True, but if one wants to do the occasional cross country into class C and
has a radio and transponder, they will have to install a bunch of new
technology, costing thousands, right?


Sounds about right.



That sounds like a move in the wrong direction for GA.


Why? Automation in ATC could provide better service at less cost.


  #6  
Old February 11th 07, 01:03 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 146
Default FAA efficiency


"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote

Why? Automation in ATC could provide better service at less cost.

How does costs of installing thousands of dollars of technology in a GA
aircraft equate to less cost?

I could pay for many movements without automation, (possibly a lifetime)
before the cost saving would be anywhere close to breaking even.
--
Jim in NC

  #7  
Old February 11th 07, 01:16 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,477
Default FAA efficiency


"Morgans" wrote in message
...

How does costs of installing thousands of dollars of technology in a GA
aircraft equate to less cost?


By being less costly than the alternative.



I could pay for many movements without automation, (possibly a lifetime)
before the cost saving would be anywhere close to breaking even.


Show me the math.


  #8  
Old February 11th 07, 01:41 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,573
Default FAA efficiency

I could pay for many movements without automation, (possibly a lifetime)
before the cost saving would be anywhere close to breaking even.


How 'bout this:

Give each aircraft owner three years' worth of that per-pilot money
the FAA is now spending to operate the national airspace, with the
requirement that we MUST use that money to add ADS-B and moving map
displays. That's $22K x 3 years, or $66,000.00.

I could put a very impressive glass cockpit in Atlas for $66K, and
I'll promise to never, ever use ATC again, except when entering Class
C or B airspace.

Do this to every aircraft in America, eliminate 75% of the ATC budget,
and in three years the FAA will be rolling in money.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.cmo
"Your Aviation Destination

  #9  
Old February 11th 07, 03:05 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Judah
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 936
Default FAA efficiency

"Morgans" wrote in news:yXtzh.105$OH6.60
@newsfe02.lga:


"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote

Why? Automation in ATC could provide better service at less cost.

How does costs of installing thousands of dollars of technology in a GA
aircraft equate to less cost?

I could pay for many movements without automation, (possibly a lifetime)
before the cost saving would be anywhere close to breaking even.


The question becomes how much must it costs to put a datalink in the cockpit.
I think there are relatively inexpensive Mode-S upgrades available, and if
they were to be adopted by a large majority of the airplanes out there, I bet
the price would go down further and more competitors would show up.

The trick is that the FAA has to make it cost effective to get certified so
that there are competitors out there. But that's not likely to happen.
  #10  
Old February 11th 07, 02:45 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jose
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 897
Default FAA efficiency

Automation in ATC could provide better service at less cost.

For whom?

Jose
--
Humans are pack animals. Above all things, they have a deep need to
follow something, be it a leader, a creed, or a mob. Whosoever fully
understands this holds the world in his hands.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SoLong Solar-Electric UAV 48 hour flight Larry Dighera Piloting 6 September 25th 16 08:01 PM
Increase efficiency of rotating shaft. jigar Home Built 8 October 6th 06 05:29 AM
High Efficiency APU fake mccoy Home Built 7 May 24th 06 12:19 PM
Differences between automotive & airplane engines Chris Wells Home Built 105 February 18th 06 11:00 PM
Gasflow of VW engine Veeduber Home Built 4 July 14th 03 08:06 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.