See if you have what it takes to be a pilot !!!

wrote:
You must be a newbie to I-net porn. That is a camel-toe pic although I
prefer to call it a pussy-toe.
I have cats, not camels in my house. The "Lolita" code word in the
upper right corner usually denotes underage, i.e kittens not pussies.
Geezers like us should be looking for MILF pictures. (Mothers I'd
Love to ****)




Thanks for the clue. If I'd known it was related to under age porn, it
would have been shredded as soon as it appeared in the inbox.




--

Cheers

Dave Kearton

"Dave Kearton" wrote in message
...
wrote:
You must be a newbie to I-net porn. That is a camel-toe pic although I
prefer to call it a pussy-toe.
I have cats, not camels in my house. The "Lolita" code word in the
upper right corner usually denotes underage, i.e kittens not pussies.
Geezers like us should be looking for MILF pictures. (Mothers I'd
Love to ****)




Thanks for the clue. If I'd known it was related to under age porn, it
would have been shredded as soon as it appeared in the inbox.


Don't sweat the underage allegation. The word 'Lolita' may be used to
invoke the impression that the models are young, but the copyright owner is
a US registered dotcom, and as such, the owners are easily tracked down. No
one is stupid enough to put thier address on a picture of a young lady that
does not have proof of 18 or over on file.


Luke

"Luke" wrote in message
...

"Dave Kearton" wrote in message
...
wrote:
You must be a newbie to I-net porn. That is a camel-toe pic although I
prefer to call it a pussy-toe.
I have cats, not camels in my house. The "Lolita" code word in the
upper right corner usually denotes underage, i.e kittens not pussies.
Geezers like us should be looking for MILF pictures. (Mothers I'd
Love to ****)




Thanks for the clue. If I'd known it was related to under age porn,
it
would have been shredded as soon as it appeared in the inbox.


Don't sweat the underage allegation. The word 'Lolita' may be used to
invoke the impression that the models are young, but the copyright owner
is
a US registered dotcom, and as such, the owners are easily tracked down.
No
one is stupid enough to put thier address on a picture of a young lady
that
does not have proof of 18 or over on file.


Luke

I agree, "Lolita" is an advertising gimmick, and the label is no real proof
of anything. The picture itself is obviously not of a pre-teen or child.

"Luke" wrote in message
...

"Dave Kearton" wrote in message
...
wrote:
You must be a newbie to I-net porn. That is a camel-toe pic although I
prefer to call it a pussy-toe.
I have cats, not camels in my house. The "Lolita" code word in the
upper right corner usually denotes underage, i.e kittens not pussies.
Geezers like us should be looking for MILF pictures. (Mothers I'd
Love to ****)




Thanks for the clue. If I'd known it was related to under age porn,
it
would have been shredded as soon as it appeared in the inbox.


Don't sweat the underage allegation. The word 'Lolita' may be used to
invoke the impression that the models are young, but the copyright owner
is
a US registered dotcom, and as such, the owners are easily tracked down.
No
one is stupid enough to put thier address on a picture of a young lady
that
does not have proof of 18 or over on file.


Luke

I agree, "Lolita" is an advertising gimmick, and the label is no real proof
of anything. The picture itself is obviously not of a pre-teen or child.

"Dave Kearton" wrote in message
...
wrote:
You must be a newbie to I-net porn. That is a camel-toe pic although I
prefer to call it a pussy-toe.
I have cats, not camels in my house. The "Lolita" code word in the
upper right corner usually denotes underage, i.e kittens not pussies.
Geezers like us should be looking for MILF pictures. (Mothers I'd
Love to ****)




Thanks for the clue. If I'd known it was related to under age porn, it
would have been shredded as soon as it appeared in the inbox.


Don't sweat the underage allegation. The word 'Lolita' may be used to
invoke the impression that the models are young, but the copyright owner is
a US registered dotcom, and as such, the owners are easily tracked down. No
one is stupid enough to put thier address on a picture of a young lady that
does not have proof of 18 or over on file.


Luke