![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: Nellis? Hpw come....?
From: "Ragnar" Date: 7/20/03 8:55 PM Pacific Daylight Time Message-id: nk.net "ArtKramr" wrote in message ... How come, as some claim, the CO at Nellis has no idea of the base closing but guys on this NG are "in the loop" and know stuff the base CO doesn't. How come? Because there is no "list". My own Base CO at Goodfellow has told us several in rumor control sessions that the only "list" that exists is in the fevered imagination of some web weirdo. I never said that. You did. (grin) Arthur Kramer Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tenant units that do not fall under the host wing generally take care of
their own mission but, when it comes to base issues, still follow direction from the wing commander. Which includes units such as numbered Air Forces. Kind of strange an O-6 can tell an O-9, who's directly above him in the chain of command, where and how his HQ will be supported. Now I'm sure theres a little "give and take", but ultimately the WG/CC controls how, when and where the HQ for a numbered Air Force is supported. BUFDRVR "Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips everyone on Bear Creek" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My previous assignment was at Travis, in the 60AMW and then at HQ 15AF.
I certainly wasn't in THAT loop but it didn't seem to be that big of a deal; the NAF really doesn't require that much support. The biggest tussle seemed to be over personnel moves. NAF would demand a certain person for a job, the wing didn't want to give them up... Usually solved over a beer at the generic, I mean, all-ranks club (wait till Art reads this). Protocol being what it is, and since the NAF would be down to administer an ASEV to the wing sooner or later, I'm sure the WG/CC was always happy to keep the NAF/CC happy. Curt "BUFDRVR" wrote in message ... Tenant units that do not fall under the host wing generally take care of their own mission but, when it comes to base issues, still follow direction from the wing commander. Which includes units such as numbered Air Forces. Kind of strange an O-6 can tell an O-9, who's directly above him in the chain of command, where and how his HQ will be supported. Now I'm sure theres a little "give and take", but ultimately the WG/CC controls how, when and where the HQ for a numbered Air Force is supported. BUFDRVR "Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips everyone on Bear Creek" |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Who's At Fault in UAV/Part91 MAC? | Larry Dighera | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | April 29th 04 03:08 PM |
Tucker and Tomcats? Nellis AFB Air Show from above | Tyson Rininger | Aerobatics | 0 | November 19th 03 11:47 PM |
Nellis Air Show Nov. 15-16 | Rich S. | Home Built | 4 | October 9th 03 06:31 PM |
Nellis on the blocks? | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 15 | July 26th 03 03:24 AM |
Nellis on the Blocks (The upcoming 2005 Base Realignment And Closure) | CFA3 | Military Aviation | 25 | July 23rd 03 04:47 AM |