![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 00:19:32 -0500, **THE-RFI-EMI-GUY**
wrote: Its just plain good sense not to use cellphones in an aircraft. Has anyone noticed how a NEXTEL phone will tear up speaker phones and computer monitors? Its the pulsing of the time division multiplex (TDMA) Nope. I have both right here and with no problem. RF signal that gets inadvertently coupled into electronics and biases transistors on and off. Think what would happen if a passenger left that phone turned on in a bag near a bulkhead next to some sensitive avionics The wiring in an aircrafti s well shielded. box and a call came in. Whenever I read about A/C having "uncommanded" control movement, I have to wonder about that environment. wrote: On Jan 25, 8:15 am, "Marco Leon" wrote: Saw a repeat episode of Mythbusters for the first time last night about the use of cell phones on an airplane and interference with cockpit instruments. I know that this was mentioned in a November 2006 thread briefly but the short of it was that they concluded cell phones really CAN interfere with the VOR signals. Not really. They determined it can be done when none of the wiring in the test cockpit is shielded. Sometime in the last year or two, the IEEE (the main EE professional society) had an authoritative article about this in their monthly magazine "IEEE Spectrum." The bottom line as I remember it: 99.999% of cell phones and other electronic gizmos cause absolutely no interference to flight instruments. (The 99.999% figure is indicative, not exact.) But, very rarely a cell phone or other electronic device gets out of spec on RFI (but still "works" so far as the user is concerned) and can make the FI's go haywire. A lap top or probably more likely to cause a problem. The authors conclude that unrestricted use of cell phones and other electronic devices (including ones now allowed) will probably cause a crash something like once every decade or so. I forget the number, but That was one of those programs where the result was it might , maybe, we think could possibly... IOW they thought the possibility might exist but could not say any thing specific. Some day one may get hit by a meteor too. Who knows? it's in that ball park -- the kind of thing that, until it happens, the regs seem overly restrictive. But after it happens, everyone will ask What regs? Last I knew the FAA had *no* regulations on the use of cell phones or other electronic radiators in aircraft with one exception. No intentional radiating devices may be used while the aircraft is operating by reference to instruments alone and I do not know if that pertains to commercial flights as well as GA.. The cell phone ban is an FCC regulation which may disappear in the not too distant future. Remember as long as it's turned on it's transmitting whether you are using it or not. Only when turned completely off does it stop transmitting. "Why didn't they ban those devices?" If memory serves me, the authors cannot rule out that such crashes have already happened. The authors had done a study in which they planted a measuring device in a suitcase and flew it on a large number of flights in an overhead bin, and recorded the EM spectrum. Interestingly, they found cell phones were used illegally about once per flight or thereabouts. They I find it difficult to believe as every one that was forgotten would have been transmitting. Many will stop working. I don't know how many times I've forgotten mine in the Deb but I always have to turn it off and back on before being able to use it. also found a number of cases where a device had failed, at least in the sense that its spectrum could cause interference to GPS and other FI's. They also reported one incident where an airliner's FI's went haywire and the captain asked everyone to shut down all electronic devices. The FI's recovered, and a bit of sleuthing traced the problem to one passenger's device. Probably a lap top. Lap tops and games are particularly bad. Add to that most lap tops now have built in WiFi. Generally they aren't a problem and when they have been its been quite evident. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-02-12, Roger wrote:
Its just plain good sense not to use cellphones in an aircraft. Has anyone noticed how a NEXTEL phone will tear up speaker phones and computer monitors? Its the pulsing of the time division multiplex (TDMA) Nope. I have both right here and with no problem. GSM phones are particularly bad about intefering with things. If I leave mine by the gearstick of my car (just below the radio), I can hear every time it hands off between cell towers on the car's radio. I can also recognise the inteference it makes as a call comes in - so I know before it rings with a call or beeps with a text message that it's going to do so because the sound of the inteference is so distinct. It will intefere with cheap CRT monitors (but not well made more expensive ones). I also have a first hand experience of a GSM phone ringing just as we were intercepting the localiser on a dark, rainy night with 600 foot ceilings. I was with a friend (who happened to be doing his first for real ILS). He had forgotten to switch his phone off, and his wife called just as we were intercepting the localiser. The calm voice of the tower controller (and everything else) was drowned out by a noise that went "BIP B B BIP B B BIP B B BIP B B BIP BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR". Anyone with a GSM phone probably recognises that noise if they've ever left their phone near a radio! Needless to say, it completely obliterated any radio communications from the tower, and I had to take over flying the approach while my friend dug into his most inaccessable pocket to find the offending phone and turn it off. So far as I can tell it didn't affect the loc or glideslope indications at all, but it certainly made the com radios completely unusable. -- Yes, the Reply-To email address is valid. Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Roger" wrote in message
... On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 00:19:32 -0500, **THE-RFI-EMI-GUY** wrote: Its just plain good sense not to use cellphones in an aircraft. Has anyone noticed how a NEXTEL phone will tear up speaker phones and computer monitors? Its the pulsing of the time division multiplex (TDMA) Nope. I have both right here and with no problem. My old phone, or old service had problems. It would periodically talk to the cell tower, doing whatever it is that cellphones do. The RF couples strongly into my audio systems. It was most noticeable in the office when I set the phone down next to the PC's speaker wire. The amplified speaker made it very audible; it's louder than normal audio coming from the PC. (I'm qualified to speak to RFI and EMI in a way you might accept; I hold a fast code Extra ticket in the US. Eleventh month; region number for great lakes; replaced by CAT scans; country where you'll find Calcutta.) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|