![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was following the thread on Bendix and Slick magnetos and contacted
several repair shops regarding getting my magnetos overhauled. I got a message back from one shop telling me they didn't overhaul magnetos they only repair them. What am I missing? I don't believe my magnetos are broken but they do have a few hundred hours on them. If I get them repaired what would be repaired? I'd get an 8130.3 from the shop with the repaired magneto. Oh, knowledgeable ones in the group please enlighten me. -- John "Ebby" Ebensperger Hatz Classic s/n37 Camden, NY |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 22, 6:53 pm, "Ebby" wrote:
I was following the thread on Bendix and Slick magnetos and contacted several repair shops regarding getting my magnetos overhauled. I got a message back from one shop telling me they didn't overhaul magnetos they only repair them. What am I missing? I don't believe my magnetos are broken but they do have a few hundred hours on them. If I get them repaired what would be repaired? I'd get an 8130.3 from the shop with the repaired magneto. Oh, knowledgeable ones in the group please enlighten me. -- John "Ebby" Ebensperger Hatz Classic s/n37 Camden, NY This is from the Canadian Aviation Regulations; I can't find similar definitions in the FARs, but I would imagine that wherever they are, they're not far off: CAR 101.01: "overhaul" - means a restoration process that includes the disassembly, inspection, repair or replacement of parts, reassembly, adjustment, refinishing and testing of an aeronautical product, and ensures that the aeronautical product is in complete conformity with the service tolerances specified in the applicable instructions for continued airworthiness. "repair" - means the rectification of deficiencies in an aeronautical product or the restoration of an aeronautical product to an airworthy condition. End of quote. So an "overhaul" ensures that the unit is returned to within new factory specs. A shop probably has to comply with some federal requirements to be called an "overhaul" shop, and would need test equipment and all sorts of special tools as well as all the parts that might be required. That shop could call the product overhauled. A "repair" is simply the fixing of whatever is haywire so that the unit will work again. In a magneto, replacing the points, condenser and perhaps distributor block and rotor would probably make things work well again, and it would be just a repair. The mechanic could not certify it as "overhauled" but it would still be a legal "repair." Cheaper, too. Dan |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ebby" wrote in message ... :I was following the thread on Bendix and Slick magnetos and contacted : several repair shops regarding getting my magnetos overhauled. I got a : message back from one shop telling me they didn't overhaul magnetos they : only repair them. What am I missing? I don't believe my magnetos are : broken but they do have a few hundred hours on them. If I get them repaired : what would be repaired? I'd get an 8130.3 from the shop with the repaired : magneto. Oh, knowledgeable ones in the group please enlighten me. : : -- : John "Ebby" Ebensperger : Hatz Classic s/n37 : Camden, NY : : FAR 43.2 Records of overhaul and rebuilding. (a) No person may describe in any required maintenance entry or form an aircraft, airframe, aircraft engine, propeller, appliance, or component part as being overhauled unless- (1) Using methods, techniques, and practices acceptable to the Administrator, it has been disassembled, cleaned, inspected, repaired as necessary, and reassembled; and (2) It has been tested in accordance with approved standards and technical data, or in accordance with current standards and technical data acceptable to the Administrator, which have been developed and documented by the holder of the type certificate, supplemental type certificate, or a material, part, process, or appliance approval under §21.305 of this chapter. (b) No person may describe in any required maintenance entry or form an aircraft, airframe, aircraft engine, propeller, appliance, or component part as being rebuilt unless it has been disassembled, cleaned, inspected, repaired as necessary, reassembled, and tested to the same tolerances and limits as a new item, using either new parts or used parts that either conform to new part tolerances and limits or to approved oversized or undersized dimensions. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just got an answer from one of the repair shops. They indicated that for
slick magnetos overhaul involves a replacement of all components making the magneto essentially new. The cost of overhaul is well like buying new. Repair included contacts and an oil seal with an up charge if anything else was required. That's about it. Ebby "Blueskies" wrote in message .. . "Ebby" wrote in message ... :I was following the thread on Bendix and Slick magnetos and contacted : several repair shops regarding getting my magnetos overhauled. I got a : message back from one shop telling me they didn't overhaul magnetos they : only repair them. What am I missing? I don't believe my magnetos are : broken but they do have a few hundred hours on them. If I get them repaired : what would be repaired? I'd get an 8130.3 from the shop with the repaired : magneto. Oh, knowledgeable ones in the group please enlighten me. : : -- : John "Ebby" Ebensperger : Hatz Classic s/n37 : Camden, NY : : FAR 43.2 Records of overhaul and rebuilding. (a) No person may describe in any required maintenance entry or form an aircraft, airframe, aircraft engine, propeller, appliance, or component part as being overhauled unless- (1) Using methods, techniques, and practices acceptable to the Administrator, it has been disassembled, cleaned, inspected, repaired as necessary, and reassembled; and (2) It has been tested in accordance with approved standards and technical data, or in accordance with current standards and technical data acceptable to the Administrator, which have been developed and documented by the holder of the type certificate, supplemental type certificate, or a material, part, process, or appliance approval under §21.305 of this chapter. (b) No person may describe in any required maintenance entry or form an aircraft, airframe, aircraft engine, propeller, appliance, or component part as being rebuilt unless it has been disassembled, cleaned, inspected, repaired as necessary, reassembled, and tested to the same tolerances and limits as a new item, using either new parts or used parts that either conform to new part tolerances and limits or to approved oversized or undersized dimensions. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sounds like they could call it an overhaul, unless Slick has a CMM or other document that requires replacement of all of
the parts you are referring to. "Ebby" wrote in message ... :I just got an answer from one of the repair shops. They indicated that for : slick magnetos overhaul involves a replacement of all components making the : magneto essentially new. The cost of overhaul is well like buying new. : Repair included contacts and an oil seal with an up charge if anything else : was required. That's about it. : : Ebby : : : "Blueskies" wrote in message : .. . : : "Ebby" wrote in message : ... : :I was following the thread on Bendix and Slick magnetos and contacted : : several repair shops regarding getting my magnetos overhauled. I got a : : message back from one shop telling me they didn't overhaul magnetos they : : only repair them. What am I missing? I don't believe my magnetos are : : broken but they do have a few hundred hours on them. If I get them : repaired : : what would be repaired? I'd get an 8130.3 from the shop with the : repaired : : magneto. Oh, knowledgeable ones in the group please enlighten me. : : : : -- : : John "Ebby" Ebensperger : : Hatz Classic s/n37 : : Camden, NY : : : : : : : FAR 43.2 Records of overhaul and rebuilding. : (a) No person may describe in any required maintenance entry or form an : aircraft, airframe, aircraft engine, propeller, : appliance, or component part as being overhauled unless- : : (1) Using methods, techniques, and practices acceptable to the : Administrator, it has been disassembled, cleaned, : inspected, repaired as necessary, and reassembled; and : : (2) It has been tested in accordance with approved standards and technical : data, or in accordance with current standards : and technical data acceptable to the Administrator, which have been : developed and documented by the holder of the type : certificate, supplemental type certificate, or a material, part, process, : or appliance approval under §21.305 of this : chapter. : : (b) No person may describe in any required maintenance entry or form an : aircraft, airframe, aircraft engine, propeller, : appliance, or component part as being rebuilt unless it has been : disassembled, cleaned, inspected, repaired as : necessary, reassembled, and tested to the same tolerances and limits as a : new item, using either new parts or used parts : that either conform to new part tolerances and limits or to approved : oversized or undersized dimensions. : : : : |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You can't call it an overhaul unless you perform the operation in strict
conformance to the manufacturer's (or tc holder, or stc holder or ...) overhaul manual or instructions. In this case, since the manufacturer's manual (according to the OP) requires the replacement of ALL components, simply doing a points, bearings, and seal is a repair, not an overhaul. I've done about as many engines as the next guy, and I can tear that sucker down, replace every part in it to BETTER than new limits, reassemble it perfectly, and since this particular manufacturer/engine OH manual requires run-in in a test cell with a club prop and I don't have either, it is simply an expensive repair, not an overhaul. Jim "Blueskies" wrote in message ... Sounds like they could call it an overhaul, unless Slick has a CMM or other document that requires replacement of all of the parts you are referring to. "Ebby" wrote in message ... :I just got an answer from one of the repair shops. They indicated that for : slick magnetos overhaul involves a replacement of all components making the : magneto essentially new. The cost of overhaul is well like buying new. : Repair included contacts and an oil seal with an up charge if anything else : was required. That's about it. : : Ebby : : : "Blueskies" wrote in message : .. . : : "Ebby" wrote in message : ... : :I was following the thread on Bendix and Slick magnetos and contacted : : several repair shops regarding getting my magnetos overhauled. I got a : : message back from one shop telling me they didn't overhaul magnetos they : : only repair them. What am I missing? I don't believe my magnetos are : : broken but they do have a few hundred hours on them. If I get them : repaired : : what would be repaired? I'd get an 8130.3 from the shop with the : repaired : : magneto. Oh, knowledgeable ones in the group please enlighten me. : : : : -- : : John "Ebby" Ebensperger : : Hatz Classic s/n37 : : Camden, NY : : : : : : : FAR 43.2 Records of overhaul and rebuilding. : (a) No person may describe in any required maintenance entry or form an : aircraft, airframe, aircraft engine, propeller, : appliance, or component part as being overhauled unless- : : (1) Using methods, techniques, and practices acceptable to the : Administrator, it has been disassembled, cleaned, : inspected, repaired as necessary, and reassembled; and : : (2) It has been tested in accordance with approved standards and technical : data, or in accordance with current standards : and technical data acceptable to the Administrator, which have been : developed and documented by the holder of the type : certificate, supplemental type certificate, or a material, part, process, : or appliance approval under §21.305 of this : chapter. : : (b) No person may describe in any required maintenance entry or form an : aircraft, airframe, aircraft engine, propeller, : appliance, or component part as being rebuilt unless it has been : disassembled, cleaned, inspected, repaired as : necessary, reassembled, and tested to the same tolerances and limits as a : new item, using either new parts or used parts : that either conform to new part tolerances and limits or to approved : oversized or undersized dimensions. : : : : |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "RST Engineering" wrote in message ... You can't call it an overhaul unless you perform the operation in strict conformance to the manufacturer's (or tc holder, or stc holder or ...) overhaul manual or instructions. In this case, since the manufacturer's manual (according to the OP) requires the replacement of ALL components, simply doing a points, bearings, and seal is a repair, not an overhaul. I've done about as many engines as the next guy, and I can tear that sucker down, replace every part in it to BETTER than new limits, reassemble it perfectly, and since this particular manufacturer/engine OH manual requires run-in in a test cell with a club prop and I don't have either, it is simply an expensive repair, not an overhaul. Jim snip Since the OP has gotten his answer, let's look at this test cell problem. I taught at an A&P school years ago. We had a test cell, with wooden test clubs. With some effort, we could adapt the cell to various makes and models of engines, but it wasn't easy or always satisfactory. The test clubs needed care and maintenance, too, just like wood props. We also had a lot of obsolete ground power equipment driven by air-cooled Continental and Lycoming engines of various sizes. Each one had a cooling fan, cowl, instrumentation, and a load of some type. I toyed with the idea of converting one or more of the rigs to serve as a test cell, but never got around to it. There are quite a few of these still around, most with either a bad engine or no engine at all, for little money. For a small shop or EAA chapter, it might be worth looking into. Dale Scroggins |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
To overhaul or not to Overhaul, that is the question- | EridanMan | Owning | 19 | May 12th 06 11:58 PM |
Question: Cylinder Repair/Overhaul vs. New Cylinders | Ebby | Home Built | 5 | December 10th 05 02:38 PM |
Magneto grounding Question | Doug Palmer | Home Built | 3 | October 8th 05 01:10 AM |
Bendix Magneto Question | Dick Kurtz | Home Built | 1 | September 22nd 05 08:51 AM |
Bendix Magneto Question | Dick Kurtz | General Aviation | 0 | September 22nd 05 03:36 AM |