![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 25, 5:22 pm, "Flashnews" wrote:
I am thinking about this really hard - and my failing memory still remembers being so amazed at a full stop landing without a hook and there was wind over the deck - perhaps that was the deciding factor for hook / no-hook. Now we also anchored at Kithira where the wind was always 30 to 40 knots over the deck and we could cycle fighters all day without steaming and fly clean for ACM missions over the ship. Again the CAG (CVW-17 1982-83) was very innovative and we did a lot of fun things with squadrons that were almost 80% TOPGUN graduates (VMFA-531 and VF-11). The COD rides were just something to try as with the helicopters, A-5's, and A-6's. I also remember coming over the ramp at around 90 knots - does that sound right I was on the Indy just before that period and there was NO WAY an F-4 could 'flanchor', not enough wind to shoot the thing while anchored, and with a max engaging speed of(geeez, don't remember) but the wind would have to be screaming to land an F-4 at anchor. . Only A/C I ever saw fly at anchorwere S-3s. BTW-80% Topgun grads? I don't think so. With each squadron getting maybe 2 pilot slots per year....besides, Topgun doesn't necessarily make you good around the boat. wrote in message ... On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 22:02:45 -0600, Charlie Wolf wrote: Bill - I was just an enlisted back seater but... "deck landings" without arresting wires were non-existent, but as I said, they were possible with enough wind over the deck. The "Book" agrees. If you have 35-40 kts. of head wind it's possible on a CVA. Sounds like a "high pucker factor" operation, though. Deck runs (takeoffs) were extremely common place. with moderate wind over the deck on a deck like Enterprise or Ranger, C-1's could take off on the angle fully loaded - with no cat. (And no problem) We deck ran in TS-2A/B/C during CARQUALS at VT-28 aboard INDEPENDANCE. No big deal. I don't recall max takeoff weight. One thing to consider also -- our runs to Da Nang were relatively short. we rarely took on fuel on the boat. I was hoping somebody had a C-1 NATOPS. So far "no joy." :-) Bill Kambic Haras Lucero, Kingston, TN Mangalarga Marchador: Uma Raça, Uma Paixão |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "qui si parla Campagnolo" wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 25, 5:22 pm, "Flashnews" wrote: I am thinking about this really hard - and my failing memory still remembers being so amazed at a full stop landing without a hook and there was wind over the deck - perhaps that was the deciding factor for hook / no-hook. Now we also anchored at Kithira where the wind was always 30 to 40 knots over the deck and we could cycle fighters all day without steaming and fly clean for ACM missions over the ship. Again the CAG (CVW-17 1982-83) was very innovative and we did a lot of fun things with squadrons that were almost 80% TOPGUN graduates (VMFA-531 and VF-11). The COD rides were just something to try as with the helicopters, A-5's, and A-6's. I also remember coming over the ramp at around 90 knots - does that sound right I was on the Indy just before that period and there was NO WAY an F-4 could 'flanchor', not enough wind to shoot the thing while anchored, and with a max engaging speed of(geeez, don't remember) but the wind would have to be screaming to land an F-4 at anchor. . Only A/C I ever saw fly at anchorwere S-3s. BTW-80% Topgun grads? I don't think so. With each squadron getting maybe 2 pilot slots per year....besides, Topgun doesn't necessarily make you good around the boat. wrote in message ... On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 22:02:45 -0600, Charlie Wolf wrote: Bill - I was just an enlisted back seater but... "deck landings" without arresting wires were non-existent, but as I said, they were possible with enough wind over the deck. The "Book" agrees. If you have 35-40 kts. of head wind it's possible on a CVA. Sounds like a "high pucker factor" operation, though. Deck runs (takeoffs) were extremely common place. with moderate wind over the deck on a deck like Enterprise or Ranger, C-1's could take off on the angle fully loaded - with no cat. (And no problem) We deck ran in TS-2A/B/C during CARQUALS at VT-28 aboard INDEPENDANCE. No big deal. I don't recall max takeoff weight. One thing to consider also -- our runs to Da Nang were relatively short. we rarely took on fuel on the boat. I was hoping somebody had a C-1 NATOPS. So far "no joy." :-) Bill Kambic Haras Lucero, Kingston, TN Mangalarga Marchador: Uma Raça, Uma Paixão Au contraire, mon ami. The Saratoga launched many (10 for the first launch sequence) aircraft while at anchor off Piraeus in August 1971. Carrier was bow on to the Acropolis up on the hill. I was there in VF103. See ADM Paul Gilchrist's book "Feet Wet" for a complete description. He was CAG at the time. The ship took on a lot of water in the #3 Main Machinery Room and was listing badly. After pumping out a lot of water they needed to launch aircraft to lighten the load and redistribute the load. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 28, 9:02 pm, "theref" wrote:
"qui si parla Campagnolo" wrote in ooglegroups.com... On Feb 25, 5:22 pm, "Flashnews" wrote: I am thinking about this really hard - and my failing memory still remembers being so amazed at a full stop landing without a hook and there was wind over the deck - perhaps that was the deciding factor for hook / no-hook. Now we also anchored at Kithira where the wind was always 30 to 40 knots over the deck and we could cycle fighters all day without steaming and fly clean for ACM missions over the ship. Again the CAG (CVW-17 1982-83) was very innovative and we did a lot of fun things with squadrons that were almost 80% TOPGUN graduates (VMFA-531 and VF-11). The COD rides were just something to try as with the helicopters, A-5's, and A-6's. I also remember coming over the ramp at around 90 knots - does that sound right I was on the Indy just before that period and there was NO WAY an F-4 could 'flanchor', not enough wind to shoot the thing while anchored, and with a max engaging speed of(geeez, don't remember) but the wind would have to be screaming to land an F-4 at anchor. . Only A/C I ever saw fly at anchorwere S-3s. BTW-80% Topgun grads? I don't think so. With each squadron getting maybe 2 pilot slots per year....besides, Topgun doesn't necessarily make you good around the boat. wrote in message .. . On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 22:02:45 -0600, Charlie Wolf wrote: Bill - I was just an enlisted back seater but... "deck landings" without arresting wires were non-existent, but as I said, they were possible with enough wind over the deck. The "Book" agrees. If you have 35-40 kts. of head wind it's possible on a CVA. Sounds like a "high pucker factor" operation, though. Deck runs (takeoffs) were extremely common place. with moderate wind over the deck on a deck like Enterprise or Ranger, C-1's could take off on the angle fully loaded - with no cat. (And no problem) We deck ran in TS-2A/B/C during CARQUALS at VT-28 aboard INDEPENDANCE. No big deal. I don't recall max takeoff weight. One thing to consider also -- our runs to Da Nang were relatively short. we rarely took on fuel on the boat. I was hoping somebody had a C-1 NATOPS. So far "no joy." :-) Bill Kambic Haras Lucero, Kingston, TN Mangalarga Marchador: Uma Raça, Uma Paixão Au contraire, mon ami. The Saratoga launched many (10 for the first launch sequence) aircraft while at anchor off Piraeus in August 1971. Carrier was bow on to the Acropolis up on the hill. I was there in VF103. See ADM Paul Gilchrist's book "Feet Wet" for a complete description. He was CAG at the time. The ship took on a lot of water in the #3 Main Machinery Room and was listing badly. After pumping out a lot of water they needed to launch aircraft to lighten the load and redistribute the load. Well, shuck my corn..heard of the Sara 'sinkex', but never heard they shot Phantoms at anchor. They must have been very light and it must've been quite a shot. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
questions for Naval aviators | Mike W. | Naval Aviation | 8 | March 13th 05 10:48 PM |
Naval Aviators | jsmith | Piloting | 1 | March 25th 04 02:56 PM |
Too many Naval Aviators | J | Naval Aviation | 0 | March 3rd 04 06:48 PM |
Naval aviators... | Kulvinder Singh Matharu | Military Aviation | 1 | August 7th 03 09:34 PM |
Naval aviators... | Tarver Engineering | Naval Aviation | 0 | August 7th 03 09:34 PM |