![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 15, 12:14 pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
writes: Yes, they can. No, they cannot, except under ideal conditions, and sometimes not even then. They do not have too. They only need to get the aircraft close enough for wing dihedral to do the rest. Its called a dynamically stable aircraft design, and its been a cornerstone of aviation almost since its inception. But what do I know, I only fly tiny planes. My thoughts exactly. That's funny, by your theory, stable flight was impossible until the mid-80s... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
EridanMan writes:
They do not have too. They only need to get the aircraft close enough for wing dihedral to do the rest. Its called a dynamically stable aircraft design, and its been a cornerstone of aviation almost since its inception. Until Airbus came along. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
EridanMan writes: They do not have too. They only need to get the aircraft close enough for wing dihedral to do the rest. Its called a dynamically stable aircraft design, and its been a cornerstone of aviation almost since its inception. Until Airbus came along. Your pathetic ignorance continues to show. This one isn't even related to your continual fantasy land. Despite all the flight control systems in the fly-by-wire airbuses, they still have positive stability. Now Boeing on the other hand thought the 767 at first wasn't going to have positive pitch stability. They spent a lot of time working with GE to develop active components to control that. Fortunately as the design progressed it turned out to not be necessary. Further, it's not just fly by wire aircraft that have artificial feel built in to them. Yes, in the case of FBW it's 100% artificial but don't believe that a lot of time isn't spent on many aircraft to get the control forces to feel right. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Until Airbus came along.
No... wrong again. Airbii are statically stable for efficiencies sake, their control mechanism is irrelevant. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: EridanMan writes: They do not have too. They only need to get the aircraft close enough for wing dihedral to do the rest. Its called a dynamically stable aircraft design, and its been a cornerstone of aviation almost since its inception. Until Airbus came along. Again, you know not of whence you speak.... Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Commercial 250nm VFR flight - all 3 landings on the same day? | Jim Macklin | Instrument Flight Rules | 39 | December 20th 06 12:11 PM |
Mooney Engine Problems in Flight | Paul Smedshammer | Piloting | 45 | December 18th 04 09:40 AM |
Looping during a commercial flight | LordAvalon | Aerobatics | 10 | October 23rd 04 04:05 PM |
Nixon on Commercial Flight | Flyin'[email protected] | Piloting | 1 | June 16th 04 05:51 PM |
Flight Unlimited 2 on Windows Xp .- any known problems? | tw | Simulators | 2 | April 25th 04 05:05 PM |