![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "David Lednicer" wrote in message ... What a crock! Those tankers have been rigorously maintained for their entire lives. Age doesn't enter into it. The B-52 is of the same vintage and continues to provide except service. Until this recent 767 debacle the Air Force said the tankers would not need to be replaced until 2020. As Nader said, this clearly "corporate giveaway" to the ailing Boeing at the expense of the American taxpayers. Nonsense! Aluminum fatigues - the KC-135s have all had to have horizontal tails cannibalized from 707s retrofitted to keep them in service. Systems fail and parts are hard to find for aircraft as old as the KC-135s. Airliners have finite lives and the KC-135s are coming to the end of theirs. I was involved during the KC-135A to KC-135R upgrades. The one item they could not replace was the Air Frame. People think the Buffs are old. One was a 1954 model. These are really , really old Aircraft and you can only rebuild them so many times before something falls off during flight that brings them down(already happens from time to time). And if anyone wonders what happens when a KC-135 hits something with a fuel load, think of 9-11 except worse. These types of AC are nothing to fool around with nor play Partisan Politics with. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 13:31:31 +0000, Daryl Hunt wrote:
"David Lednicer" wrote in message ... What a crock! Those tankers have been rigorously maintained for their entire lives. Age doesn't enter into it. The B-52 is of the same vintage and continues to provide except service. Until this recent 767 debacle the Air Force said the tankers would not need to be replaced until 2020. As Nader said, this clearly "corporate giveaway" to the ailing Boeing at the expense of the American taxpayers. Nonsense! Aluminum fatigues - the KC-135s have all had to have horizontal tails cannibalized from 707s retrofitted to keep them in service. Systems fail and parts are hard to find for aircraft as old as the KC-135s. Airliners have finite lives and the KC-135s are coming to the end of theirs. I was involved during the KC-135A to KC-135R upgrades. The one item they could not replace was the Air Frame. People think the Buffs are old. One was a 1954 model. These are really , really old Aircraft and you can only rebuild them so many times before something falls off during flight that brings them down(already happens from time to time). And if anyone wonders what happens when a KC-135 hits something with a fuel load, think of 9-11 except worse. These types of AC are nothing to fool around with nor play Partisan Politics with. Wichita, Kansas, January 1965. Fully loaded KC-135 takes off from McConnell AFB and immediately has problems. Pieces falling off, it seems to be turning back to the base, but goes in about 4 miles north of the runway. I don't know if was under control to the end, but it hit about ..5 mile west of the university, about .5 east of an oil refinery, and about .25 mile south of a residential school for the hearing impaired. Nobody made it out, and many killed on the ground. There's a park there now. I still remember seeing the pillar of smoke. Gary -- Gary W. Oehlert (remove x's) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
rec.aviation replaced by yahoo?? | Steve | Home Built | 12 | August 24th 03 06:37 PM |
Israel may lease Boeing 767 tankers. | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 0 | August 8th 03 12:33 AM |