![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill Clark" wrote in message om... I saw a PBS special on the X-plane competition between Boeing and Lockheed for the Joint Task Force (JTF) fighter; the jet of the future. I think the whole thing was a total waste of money, and that by signing off on this competition the Pentagon has doomed America to a useless arsenal. Boeing's plane was so heavy they had to remove panels before it could even hover. Neither aircraft could stay in the air more than half an hour without refueling (Boeing's Navy style in-flight refueling system was not operational and so they had to land every half an hour to refuel). Neither plane had any armaments or weapons during all of this. ******** , the lockmart plane demonstrated better range than the F-18 The problem is that the Pentagon requires the JTF to be vertical take off/landing capable. By doing so they are requiring 25% of the aircraft to be devoted to the necessary systems; in the case of the winning Lockheed aircraft, a huge fan in the middle of the fuselage. Incorrect only ONE variant of the 3 offered has VSTOL and only that variant has the fan. Granted, it's an elegant engineering accomplishment but it has zero combat effectiveness. Requiring all jets to be built by these standards is suicidal because it reduces the range and payload of every attack jet. It's really depressing to me that our military planners have come up with such an idiotic plan and that neither Lockheed or Boeing made the slightest objection. Clearly they are not American companies any longer but multi national corporations whose sympathies belong to the highest bidder. What depresses me is that someone who describes himself as a PE got so little right. Keith |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ...
"Bill Clark" wrote in message om... It's really depressing to me that our military planners have come up with such an idiotic plan and that neither Lockheed or Boeing made the slightest objection. Clearly they are not American companies any longer but multi national corporations whose sympathies belong to the highest bidder. What depresses me is that someone who describes himself as a PE got so little right. Apparently this Bill Clark is a known-by-name troll nutcase from a few space sciences newsgroups anyway. If he follows form, he won't post in this thread again. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jeb Hoge" wrote in message om... "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... Apparently this Bill Clark is a known-by-name troll nutcase from a few space sciences newsgroups anyway. If he follows form, he won't post in this thread again. We've heard from him before, he pops up every now and then. usually its to tell us how some group or other has done him wrong, so this is new experience ![]() Keith |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | January 1st 05 07:29 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | July 1st 04 08:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | March 1st 04 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | February 1st 04 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | September 1st 03 07:27 AM |