![]()  | 
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. | 
		
			
  | 	
	
	
		
		|||||||
  | 
| 
		 | 
	Thread Tools | Display Modes | 
| 
	 | 
| 
		 
			 
			#1  
			 
            
			
			
			
		 
		
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
	
	
		
			
			 
I entered the same numbers in my Sporty's E6B and got 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		 
		
	
	
	PA: 998 DA: 1910 Which is about the same as on the chart. Your reading of 2000 DA for 1000 PA is slightly off. You need at least 22 deg C for that. - Tom On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:20:43 GMT, "Dallas" wrote: My trusty Sporty's Electronic E6B does not agree with the Density Altitude Chart. My instructor is at a loss to explain the difference. Can anybody tell me what's going on? Here's a sample problem: Field Elevation: 1165 Altimeter Setting: 30.10 Temperatu 21°C ___________________ Using the standard chart: http://pacificrimprinting.com/densalt.pdf 30.1 in. Hg Pressure Altitude Conversion Factor: -165 Pressure Altitude: 1000 Density Altitude: 2000 ___________________ Sporty's E6B calculation: Pressure Altitude: 985 Density Altitude: 1894 The Sporty's pressure altitude is off by -15 feet and the density altitude is off by -106 feet. I can't imagine Sporty's marketing a flawed E6B, which one is inaccurate?  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#2  
			 
            
			
			
			
		 
		
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
	
	
		
			
			 
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:59:35 GMT, Tom L. wrote: 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		 
		
	
	
	I entered the same numbers in my Sporty's E6B and got PA: 998 DA: 1910 You entered the *same* numbers into your Sporty's E6B and got different numbers than my Sporty's E6B? What's going on here? -- Dallas  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#3  
			 
            
			
			
			
		 
		
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
	
	
		
			
			 
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:59:35 GMT, Tom L. wrote: 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		 
		
	
	
	I entered the same numbers in my Sporty's E6B and got PA: 998 DA: 1910 Field Elev : 1165 Pressure Alt: 1000 Temp : 21 C DSSCalc - DA = 1931 CoPilot 1931 Garmin GPS 1930 If you want me to dig out the software I wrote based on "Flight Theory for Pilots", it's around here someplace...  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#4  
			 
            
			
			
			
		 
		
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
	
	
		
			
			 
On Apr 29, 4:16 pm, Blanche  wrote: 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		 
		
	
	
	On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:59:35 GMT, Tom L. wrote: I entered the same numbers in my Sporty's E6B and got PA: 998 DA: 1910 Field Elev : 1165 Pressure Alt: 1000 Temp : 21 C DSSCalc - DA = 1931 CoPilot 1931 Garmin GPS 1930 If you want me to dig out the software I wrote based on "Flight Theory for Pilots", it's around here someplace... Blanche, my flight planning software AirPlan comes up with 1931 as well... Dean  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#5  
			 
            
			
			
			
		 
		
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
	
	
		
			
			 
Blanche  wrote in  
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		 
		
	
	
	: On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:59:35 GMT, Tom L. wrote: I entered the same numbers in my Sporty's E6B and got PA: 998 DA: 1910 Field Elev : 1165 Pressure Alt: 1000 Temp : 21 C DSSCalc - DA = 1931 CoPilot 1931 Garmin GPS 1930 If you want me to dig out the software I wrote based on "Flight Theory for Pilots", it's around here someplace... FWIW - My 13 year old Jeppesen TechStar for PA = 1000 and Temp = 21C also gives DA of 1931'. Worked just fine on my instrument written. -- Marty Shapiro Silicon Rallye Inc. (remove SPAMNOT to email me)  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#6  
			 
            
			
			
			
		 
		
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
	
	
		
			
			 
Dallas wrote: 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		 
		
	
	
	On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:59:35 GMT, Tom L. wrote: I entered the same numbers in my Sporty's E6B and got PA: 998 DA: 1910 You entered the *same* numbers into your Sporty's E6B and got different numbers than my Sporty's E6B? What's going on here? It is called tolerance. An E6B is a mechanical device. The registration of the embossing on the various rings can be a little off. The rivet may not be exactly centered on all of the disks, etc. It doesn't take much to be off by a fair bit given the meager resolution of the scales on the E6B. When I took my commercial written last year, I could never get exactly the numbers in the study guide for the computation problems, but I was close enough to know which answer was correct. Matt  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#7  
			 
            
			
			
			
		 
		
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
	
	
		
			
			 
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:59:35 GMT, Tom L. wrote: 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		 
		
	
	
	I entered the same numbers in my Sporty's E6B and got PA: 998 DA: 1910 Here's photo evidence of our discrepancy: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...SportysE6B.jpg BTW, mine is fresh from Sporty's a month ago. -- Dallas  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#8  
			 
            
			
			
			
		 
		
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
	
	
		
			
			 
Right he  
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		 
		
	
	
	http://www.flickr.com/photos/8058120@N06/477406074/ Feel free to use the picture if you decide to call Sporty's. BTW, mine is two or three years old. Yours must have the new and improved algorithms. ![]() On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 19:58:04 GMT, Dallas wrote: On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:59:35 GMT, Tom L. wrote: I entered the same numbers in my Sporty's E6B and got PA: 998 DA: 1910 Here's photo evidence of our discrepancy: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...SportysE6B.jpg BTW, mine is fresh from Sporty's a month ago.  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#9  
			 
            
			
			
			
		 
		
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
	
	
		
			
			 
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:22:56 GMT, Tom L. wrote: 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		 
		
	
	
	BTW, mine is two or three years old. Yours must have the new and improved algorithms. ![]() Indeed. :-) -- Dallas  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#10  
			 
            
			
			
			
		 
		
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
	
	
		
			
			 
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:22:56 GMT, Tom L. wrote: 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		 
		
	
	
	Feel free to use the picture if you decide to call Sporty's. Here is the image I sent to Sporty's asking for an explanation: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...SportysE6B.jpg -- Dallas  | 
  | 
    
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
		
  | 
	
		
  | 
			 
			Similar Threads
		 | 
	||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | 
| Air density question?? Pilot's Handbook ofAeronautical knowledge | karl gruber | Piloting | 9 | June 29th 06 09:28 PM | 
| VOR disparity | Rich S. | Home Built | 7 | January 4th 06 09:31 PM | 
| atmospheric density effects on airfoils | Stubby | General Aviation | 5 | June 24th 05 03:43 AM | 
| Student needs assistance density altitude calcs | hellothere.adelphia.net | Rotorcraft | 4 | August 19th 04 08:25 AM | 
| Pressure Altitude or Density Altitude | john smith | Piloting | 3 | July 22nd 04 11:48 AM |