![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Paul J. Adam" wrote:
In message , Peter Stickney writes That being said, even when you strip the myth off it, the Arrow was an amazing project. There are only 3 countries which have built and flown Supersonic Heavy Interceptors. The U.S., the Soviet Union, and Canada. That's danged good. What about the Tornado F.3? -- When you have to kill a man, it costs nothing to be polite. W S Churchill Paul J. Adam MainBoxatjrwlynch[dot]demon{dot}co(.)uk And the English Electric Lightnings? -- Andrew Chaplin SIT MIHI GLADIUS SICUT SANCTO MARTINO (If you're going to e-mail me, you'll have to get "yourfinger." out.) |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
In message , Andrew Chaplin
writes "Paul J. Adam" wrote: What about the Tornado F.3? And the English Electric Lightnings? I was thinking of interceptors that had a loiter capability and long patrol range, as well as climb rate and dash speed. France gets included with the Mirage if "take off, get to altitude, shoot at something, go home" is the mission profile ![]() -- When you have to kill a man, it costs nothing to be polite. W S Churchill Paul J. Adam MainBoxatjrwlynch[dot]demon{dot}co(.)uk |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 10:30:51 GMT, Andrew Chaplin
wrote: And the English Electric Lightnings? Excellent for intercepting something bombing the airfield perimeter. greg -- $ReplyAddress =~ s#\@.*$##; # Delete everything after the '@' Alley Gator. With those hypnotic big green eyes Alley Gator. She'll make you 'fraid 'em She'll chew you up, ain't no lie |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Greg Hennessy wrote:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 10:30:51 GMT, Andrew Chaplin wrote: And the English Electric Lightnings? Excellent for intercepting something bombing the airfield perimeter. Ah, but Peter Stickney's description was "Supersonic Heavy Interceptors" -- no mention of range. ;^) But your point is taken. -- Andrew Chaplin SIT MIHI GLADIUS SICUT SANCTO MARTINO (If you're going to e-mail me, you'll have to get "yourfinger." out.) |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Andrew Chaplin writes: Greg Hennessy wrote: On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 10:30:51 GMT, Andrew Chaplin wrote: And the English Electric Lightnings? Excellent for intercepting something bombing the airfield perimeter. Ah, but Peter Stickney's description was "Supersonic Heavy Interceptors" -- no mention of range. ;^) But your point is taken. True, I should have been more explicit. A Heavy Interceptor is something lang-ranged and reliable enough that nobody would be nervous about sending them up over the Tundra, or the Artic Ocean. Candiadtes in that category would be the Tu-128, MiG-25, F-101, F-106, F-4, the CF-105, the YF-12, and the didn't get built F-108. I;m actually a bit leery about the YF-12. Blackbirds don't take well to sitting on an alert pad, waiting to scramble. It takes a lot of time & effort to prep one for a flight. -- Pete Stickney A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many bad measures. -- Daniel Webster |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Andrew Chaplin wrote:
Paul J. Adam wrote: Peter Stickney wrote: There are only 3 countries which have built and flown Supersonic Heavy Interceptors. The U.S., the Soviet Union, and Canada. That's danged good. What about the Tornado F.3? And the English Electric Lightnings? I could be wrong, but it appears to me that Peter was referring to the YF-12A, MiG-25, and Canada's White Elephant (Arrow). -Mike Marron |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Andrew Chaplin writes: "Paul J. Adam" wrote: In message , Peter Stickney writes That being said, even when you strip the myth off it, the Arrow was an amazing project. There are only 3 countries which have built and flown Supersonic Heavy Interceptors. The U.S., the Soviet Union, and Canada. That's danged good. What about the Tornado F.3? And the English Electric Lightnings? Heavy interceptor implies long range area intercept, rather than Point Defence. Lightnings are very exciting, but a reheat takeoff is a double emoergeny declaration - Low Fuel, and a Fire on Board. (Well, in the reheat burner, anyway, usually). The Lightning was a great performer, but it was really limited to a profile of "CLimb straight up tp 50,000', shoot the missiles, and glide home." -- Pete Stickney A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many bad measures. -- Daniel Webster |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GPT (Gulfport MS) ILS 14 question | A Lieberman | Instrument Flight Rules | 18 | January 30th 05 05:51 PM |
| VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 06:03 AM |
| Question | Charles S | Home Built | 4 | April 5th 04 10:10 PM |
| Tecumseh Engine Mounting Question | jlauer | Home Built | 7 | November 16th 03 02:51 AM |
| Question about Question 4488 | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | October 27th 03 02:26 AM |