![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 05/10/07 09:49, Vishvas Vasuki wrote:
Also, how much time might I need to spend reading books to pass the examination? Sincerely, Vishvas Vasuki Fuel Figure $4/gallon and 8Gal/hr. Total of $32/hour for fuel about $30/hr for and Instructor. It looks like if you figure $100/hr for the university flight option you would be real close. The flying club you mention hase an expensive instructor, IMHO. I would say that option #1 is the less expensive of the two... Thanks! Based on the figures you quoted, I did the math, and I agree that the university club is a better investment. Even if I factor in membership fees for six months and the initiation fee at the university club, the hourly cost at the two clubs seem to be $105 and $129 respectively. It seems to come from the difference in the rental costs and the instructor costs. -Vishvas Does either option provide any insurance for you? If you are a part owner in the plane, make sure you are listed as a 'named insured' on the insurance policy (or that the policy includes a 'no subrogation' clause). This will help prevent the insurance company from coming after you in the event they pay the club for a claim. Will you be responsible for any deductibles in either case? -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane, USUA Ultralight Pilot Cal Aggie Flying Farmers Sacramento, CA |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
Does either option provide any insurance for you? If you are a part owner in the plane, make sure you are listed as a 'named insured' on the insurance policy (or that the policy includes a 'no subrogation' clause). This will help prevent the insurance company from coming after you in the event they pay the club for a claim. Will you be responsible for any deductibles in either case? Thanks for the insurance warnings. I will check them out. The university club web-page says, "As a member of the CFC, you will become an equal owner of our aircraft. All aircraft are maintained to the highest standards and we carry excellent insurance." But the university club's constitution has this to say: "Section B - Financial Responsibility 1. A flying member operating a Club airplane shall be totally responsible for any damage occurring while the airplane is in his/her custody. 2. A flying member's responsibility shall begin when the airplane is untied or accepted from another member, and continued until it is tied down or turned over to another member. 3. If damage should result from a mechanical defect or other factor beyond the control of the member concerned, the flying members may elect, by majority vote, to share or absorb completely the resulting cost, depending on the circumstances of the individual case." But I have not yet found insurance information at the other flying school (Northampton Airport) online. Sincerely, Vishvas |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recently, Vishvas Vasuki posted:
Hi, Does either option provide any insurance for you? If you are a part owner in the plane, make sure you are listed as a 'named insured' on the insurance policy (or that the policy includes a 'no subrogation' clause). This will help prevent the insurance company from coming after you in the event they pay the club for a claim. Will you be responsible for any deductibles in either case? Thanks for the insurance warnings. I will check them out. The university club web-page says, "As a member of the CFC, you will become an equal owner of our aircraft. All aircraft are maintained to the highest standards and we carry excellent insurance." But the university club's constitution has this to say: "Section B - Financial Responsibility 1. A flying member operating a Club airplane shall be totally responsible for any damage occurring while the airplane is in his/her custody. 2. A flying member's responsibility shall begin when the airplane is untied or accepted from another member, and continued until it is tied down or turned over to another member. 3. If damage should result from a mechanical defect or other factor beyond the control of the member concerned, the flying members may elect, by majority vote, to share or absorb completely the resulting cost, depending on the circumstances of the individual case." I'm hard pressed to see any advantage to this insurance coverage, and would consider it a requirement to carry your own insurance. Factor in that, and the costs come closer to or exceed that of the other flying school, depending on the number of hours that you fly. But I have not yet found insurance information at the other flying school (Northampton Airport) online. That may be an important difference. If their coverage is no better than the university's, that will also imply that you obtain your own insurance. Regards, Neil |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 05/10/07 21:23, Vishvas Vasuki wrote:
Hi, Does either option provide any insurance for you? If you are a part owner in the plane, make sure you are listed as a 'named insured' on the insurance policy (or that the policy includes a 'no subrogation' clause). This will help prevent the insurance company from coming after you in the event they pay the club for a claim. Will you be responsible for any deductibles in either case? Thanks for the insurance warnings. I will check them out. The university club web-page says, "As a member of the CFC, you will become an equal owner of our aircraft. All aircraft are maintained to the highest standards and we carry excellent insurance." But the university club's constitution has this to say: "Section B - Financial Responsibility 1. A flying member operating a Club airplane shall be totally responsible for any damage occurring while the airplane is in his/her custody. 2. A flying member's responsibility shall begin when the airplane is untied or accepted from another member, and continued until it is tied down or turned over to another member. 3. If damage should result from a mechanical defect or other factor beyond the control of the member concerned, the flying members may elect, by majority vote, to share or absorb completely the resulting cost, depending on the circumstances of the individual case." Well, this certainly makes it sound like the club's insurance policy does not cover you. You may want to consider getting your own insurance. Just beware that the cost of hull coverage for renter pilots is not cheap. Also, if the club tells you that their insurance will cover the airplane, and they will only need you to cover the deductible, keep in mind that the club's insurance company can still come after you for the full amount of the claim, unless the policy has a no subrogation or similar clause. The main driving force behind joining the club I did was that they include each member as a 'named insured' on the policy, so the insurance company can't come after us for recovery. The club even covers the deductible. When I weighed the $20/month club dues against what it would cost me to carry that much renter's insurance, it was a no-brainer. But I have not yet found insurance information at the other flying school (Northampton Airport) online. Sincerely, Vishvas -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane, USUA Ultralight Pilot Cal Aggie Flying Farmers Sacramento, CA |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Does either option provide any insurance for you? If you are a part owner in the plane, make sure you are listed as a 'named insured' on the insurance policy (or that the policy includes a 'no subrogation' clause). This will help prevent the insurance company from coming after you in the event they pay the club for a claim. Will you be responsible for any deductibles in either case? More importantly IMHO If someone fries the engine tomorrow, are you on the hook for a share to buy a new one? What is your share of the deductible if someone writes it off? Is there an account that saves toward major items like engine rebuild? Owning part of the plane can be good - because you have an asset that you can sell - but make sure you understand all of your assumed liabilities. I hope that this helps, Welcome to the world of flight! Tony -- Tony Roberts PP-ASEL VFR OTT Night Cessna 172H C-GICE |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question about training costs | Tolwyn | Piloting | 39 | August 26th 05 04:00 AM |
XC training and rentals in the US? | Bill Daniels | Soaring | 4 | April 9th 05 08:08 AM |
Nationwide aircraft rentals | Lou | Home Built | 1 | February 2nd 05 12:31 AM |
comparing Eurofighter and F-35 | phil hunt | Military Aviation | 1 | January 25th 04 03:19 AM |
comparing russian and US jet engines OH times | old hoodoo | Military Aviation | 22 | December 17th 03 04:33 AM |