![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A Guy Called Tyketto writes:
So your charts are the only ones that are right, and the Arizona state government is wrong? The charts are what I would use if I had to land somewhere. Why is the State suddenly more right than the charts? Do you consult the State before flying, or the charts? Show me at NACO, MyAirplane, or anyplace where a current A/FD exists that has L50. Why is MyAirplane more reliable than an official chart? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Mxsmanic wrote: A Guy Called Tyketto writes: So your charts are the only ones that are right, and the Arizona state government is wrong? The charts are what I would use if I had to land somewhere. Why is the State suddenly more right than the charts? Do you consult the State before flying, or the charts? If the state owns the airport (which in the US, the city and/or state's Dept. of Transportation owns and operates the airport) indicates that the field is closed, I would believe the state over old charts. See below for why. Show me at NACO, MyAirplane, or anyplace where a current A/FD exists that has L50. Why is MyAirplane more reliable than an official chart? Because MyAirplane as well as NACO contain the official A/FDs for a given airport. They are also on a more updated cycle than sectionals. A good pilot shall and must ALWAYS have the most recent charts with them. If they don't, they are asking for being blasted by controllers. If the latest A/FDs show a field to be closed, then the sectionals that have the field shown as open are outdated. Therefore, your charts are outdated, and you are wrong. Yet another among countless times 'you are wrong' has to be drilled into your head. Perhaps next time we shouldn't use a statement, but an actual drill. BL. - -- Brad Littlejohn | Email: Unix Systems Administrator, | Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! ![]() PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGZmsryBkZmuMZ8L8RApffAJ9cI7182/B7tHrU3X56ql3bRa8jcgCg6Mmj FJzqo8FsypiNZAbiH8TC25I= =MxL9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A Guy Called Tyketto wrote:
Yet another among countless times 'you are wrong' has to be drilled into your head. Perhaps next time we shouldn't use a statement, but an actual drill. Be prepared for the cloud of methane that will be released.. ![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... Since you will be just simulating the landing, you will be OK. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: A Guy Called Tyketto writes: So your charts are the only ones that are right, and the Arizona state government is wrong? The charts are what I would use if I had to land somewhere. Why is the State suddenly more right than the charts? Do you consult the State before flying, or the charts? Show me at NACO, MyAirplane, or anyplace where a current A/FD exists that has L50. Why is MyAirplane more reliable than an official chart? What's it matter to yuo. The only official chart you need is the one that gets you to your Fritos. Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Grand Canyon West Airport - 1G4 | Dan | Piloting | 6 | November 29th 06 01:11 AM |
Grand Canyon overflight proposal | john smith | Piloting | 71 | April 23rd 06 05:30 AM |
Four States and the Grand Canyon | Mary Daniel or David Grah | Soaring | 6 | December 6th 04 10:36 AM |
PIREP: Grand Canyon Caverns (L37) | Tony Cox | Piloting | 4 | November 2nd 03 12:54 PM |
Near Catasstrophy over Grand Canyon! | Boudewijn van Ingen | Simulators | 5 | August 6th 03 09:55 PM |