![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I thought I had this compressor power thing down to a pretty good science
until they started screwing around with "rated watts" and "peak power" and all that crap that makes their compressor look really good until you go to use it. Back when we were using "real" horsepower I used a figure of 750 (to make it easy to calculate, I believe 746 is the actual number) watts per horsepower and an efficiency factor of 85% so that a one horse motor would take 860 watts to do the actual work. But then you multiplied that times two for "starting" wattage for a couple of seconds to give 1725 watts under start and then times three for starting under some volume of air left in the compressor reservoir or about 2600 watts. That presses my 2200 watt continuous duty (2800 watts peak) fairly close to the load limit, but certainly gives a margin for error that seems reasonable. Before I tell elebendy bazillion Kitplanes readers that the Harbor Freight Subaru 2200 watt generator will drive the Sears 1 horse compressor (and even worse, buy the Sears compressor only to not have it work), will somebody please do a reality check on me for horsepower/watts for this lashup. (Note ... convert watts to amperes by dividing watts by 120 volts). 860w=7a 1725w=14a 2600w=21a Sears and Harbor Freight are damned near clueless about this sort of stuff. If anybody has a source I can reference for running/starting/starting under load for air compressors it would be well received. I'd LIKE to buy a 3/4 horse compressor but they go from the kiddie's 1/4 horse toy straight to one horse with darned little in between. Jim -- "Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die today." --James Dean |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 18, 2:49 pm, "RST Engineering" wrote:
I thought I had this compressor power thing down to a pretty good science until they started screwing around with "rated watts" and "peak power" and all that crap that makes their compressor look really good until you go to use it. Back when we were using "real" horsepower I used a figure of 750 (to make it easy to calculate, I believe 746 is the actual number) watts per horsepower and an efficiency factor of 85% so that a one horse motor would take 860 watts to do the actual work. But then you multiplied that times two for "starting" wattage for a couple of seconds to give 1725 watts under start and then times three for starting under some volume of air left in the compressor reservoir or about 2600 watts. That presses my 2200 watt continuous duty (2800 watts peak) fairly close to the load limit, but certainly gives a margin for error that seems reasonable. Before I tell elebendy bazillion Kitplanes readers that the Harbor Freight Subaru 2200 watt generator will drive the Sears 1 horse compressor (and even worse, buy the Sears compressor only to not have it work), will somebody please do a reality check on me for horsepower/watts for this lashup. (Note ... convert watts to amperes by dividing watts by 120 volts). 860w=7a 1725w=14a 2600w=21a Sears and Harbor Freight are damned near clueless about this sort of stuff. If anybody has a source I can reference for running/starting/starting under load for air compressors it would be well received. I'd LIKE to buy a 3/4 horse compressor but they go from the kiddie's 1/4 horse toy straight to one horse with darned little in between. Jim -- "Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die today." --James Dean Have you ever noticed that in the horsepower place on the motor dataplate it says something like "SPL"? The motor mfg doesn't want to be complicit on the out right lying done by the compressor mfgs, who never heard that 750 watts = 1 hp. Charletons. BH |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:53:30 -0700, "
wrote: Have you ever noticed that in the horsepower place on the motor dataplate it says something like "SPL"? The motor mfg doesn't want to be complicit on the out right lying done by the compressor mfgs, who never heard that 750 watts = 1 hp. NOTHING beats Shop-Vac HP ratings. 6HP from a 15 amp 120v outlet! Awesome! G |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
B A R R Y wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:53:30 -0700, " wrote: Have you ever noticed that in the horsepower place on the motor dataplate it says something like "SPL"? The motor mfg doesn't want to be complicit on the out right lying done by the compressor mfgs, who never heard that 750 watts = 1 hp. NOTHING beats Shop-Vac HP ratings. 6HP from a 15 amp 120v outlet! Awesome! G Good golly, I hadn't noticed that before! 15 amps at 120 V is 1800 watts Roughly 746 (100% efficiency) watts per HP 750 x 6 = 4476 watts Less than 1/2 the claimed power! I wonder if I could take it back and exchange it for a REAL 6 hp vac??? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"B A R R Y" wrote in message
news ![]() On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:53:30 -0700, " wrote: Have you ever noticed that in the horsepower place on the motor dataplate it says something like "SPL"? The motor mfg doesn't want to be complicit on the out right lying done by the compressor mfgs, who never heard that 750 watts = 1 hp. NOTHING beats Shop-Vac HP ratings. 6HP from a 15 amp 120v outlet! Awesome! G 240% efficiency is very impressive--for a single phase motor! The last time that I wandered through the tool department at Sears, I saw what appeared to be the same compressor that I used to own. Mine could manage about 2CFM at 40PSI, and claimed to be 2HP on the aforementioned 120V circuit--IIRC with a continued draw of about 10A. The new ones were claiming either 4 or 6 CFM, and I believe that the pressure may have been higher as well, on the same electrical power. So the problem is not new, but it is getting much worse. Peter (In the future, tools will be rated like sound systems.) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Dohm wrote:
(In the future, tools will be rated like sound systems.) Let's hope the tradition doesn't extend to airplane power plants. G |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
B A R R Y wrote:
Let's hope the tradition doesn't extend to airplane power plants. G Oh don't worry, it will. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
B A R R Y wrote:
Peter Dohm wrote: (In the future, tools will be rated like sound systems.) Let's hope the tradition doesn't extend to airplane power plants. G Well, there was the 150 horse Franklin. And the 60 horse VW. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "RST Engineering" wrote But then you multiplied that times two for "starting" wattage for a couple of seconds to give 1725 watts under start and then times three for starting under some volume of air left in the compressor reservoir or about 2600 watts. Most air compressors have a valve that lets off the air pressure in the line between the pump and the tank, when they shut off. You can tell if it has this feature, by seeing a little air line going to the pressure on/off switch. You may not need to multiply so big for starting with air in the tank. -- Jim in NC |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 13:49:59 -0700, "RST Engineering"
wrote: I thought I had this compressor power thing down to a pretty good science until they started screwing around with "rated watts" and "peak power" and all that crap that makes their compressor look really good until you go to use it. Back when we were using "real" horsepower I used a figure of 750 (to make it easy to calculate, I believe 746 is the actual number) watts per horsepower and an efficiency factor of 85% so that a one horse motor would take 860 watts to do the actual work. But then you multiplied that times two for "starting" wattage for a couple of seconds to give 1725 watts under start and then times three for starting under some volume of air left in the compressor reservoir or about 2600 watts. That presses my 2200 watt continuous duty (2800 watts peak) fairly close to the load limit, but certainly gives a margin for error that seems reasonable. Before I tell elebendy bazillion Kitplanes readers that the Harbor Freight Subaru 2200 watt generator will drive the Sears 1 horse compressor (and even worse, buy the Sears compressor only to not have it work), will somebody please do a reality check on me for horsepower/watts for this lashup. (Note ... convert watts to amperes by dividing watts by 120 volts). 860w=7a 1725w=14a 2600w=21a Sears and Harbor Freight are damned near clueless about this sort of stuff. If anybody has a source I can reference for running/starting/starting under load for air compressors it would be well received. I'd LIKE to buy a 3/4 horse compressor but they go from the kiddie's 1/4 horse toy straight to one horse with darned little in between. Jim Jim, Living off-grid, and generating most of my own power from renewables, I am somewhat familiar with your issue. Although your approach may make theoretical sense, in the real world (as you found out) it frequently doesn't work. The startup surge for an electric motor is given by a parameter called "locked rotor amps" (means pretty much what it says). This can either be measured (with a clamp-on ammeter), or derived from a letter on the nameplate of the actual motor multiplied by the running amps. A compressor is one of the more difficult devices to start. Without specific data, I would figure starting amps to be at least five times the nameplate amperage rating. Fugedabout trying to convert nameplate HP to startup surge. It might be less, or not. So far as your generator is concerned, it is likely that the ratings assume a power factor of 1. But an induction motor, such as is in your compressor, will have a power factor considerably less than 1. This further increases the amount of "real power" the generator must supply. And may also explain why the nameplate amperage rating seems higher than what you predict by using HP and an assumed efficiency. I happen to have a Sears 1HP compressor (1.5HP Peak). Mine has a nameplate rating of 10.5A @ 120V. I could not see/locate the nameplate on the motor itself, so I figured a 52.5A startup surge (5X). My inverter has a 78A peak capacity (46A continuous) so I figured things would work -- and they have. Your 2800W peak generator translates to 23.3A at 120VAC. If you have the same Sears compressor as I do, I'm not surprised that the generator will have a problem starting it. Another issue that comes up with compressors has to do with flat spots on the rotor as they age. This causes them to draw the locked rotor amp startup current for a longer period of time when new. This can also cause an otherwise adequately sized system to "blow" on startup, occasionally. --ron |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
more horsepower | T-Bone | Piloting | 11 | March 20th 06 10:56 PM |
Lycoming Horsepower Calculation? | Mark Doble | Home Built | 1 | June 20th 05 10:46 PM |
Thermals and Horsepower | Ken Kochanski (KK) | Soaring | 14 | January 9th 05 05:50 PM |
Air Compressor for RV Builder | John Bundy | Home Built | 5 | March 27th 04 01:47 PM |
Horsepower | Andre | Home Built | 3 | July 18th 03 10:50 AM |