|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
June 19th 07, 03:07 PM
posted to rec.aviation.piloting
|
|||
|
|||
FSS, again
"Paul kgyy" wrote in message
oups.com... I'm really beginning to wonder if FSS, particularly in its current Lockheed form, has any useful service to provide anymore, though admittedly, there is substantial cost to get the onboard avionics. But I really think it's worth the money in providing better info than you can get anywhere else in real time. I don't normally follow conspiracy theories, but they could be intentionally driving away 'customers' to lower their future costs. Their small fine could easily be absorbed if they reduce their workload by 10% 
|
|
#2
June 30th 07, 03:25 AM
posted to rec.aviation.piloting
|
|||
|
|||
|
FSS, again
Now that they moved away, I've about given up on FSS for short local
flights, I just get the weather from ADDS and file with DUATS. What is the small fine you mentioned? "El Maximo" wrote in message ... "Paul kgyy" wrote in message oups.com... I'm really beginning to wonder if FSS, particularly in its current Lockheed form, has any useful service to provide anymore, though admittedly, there is substantial cost to get the onboard avionics. But I really think it's worth the money in providing better info than you can get anywhere else in real time. I don't normally follow conspiracy theories, but they could be intentionally driving away 'customers' to lower their future costs. Their small fine could easily be absorbed if they reduce their workload by 10%
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
