![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 02:42:54 -0400, "Richard Goldsberry"
wrote: These "bombs" look like the training bombs filled with water and sand to approx. the weight of the real McCoy. Actually, they are likely filled with only air. The FAA gets really upset when you load live ordinance on a non-military (active) aircarft. Training loads with smoke charges actually fall in the same category. I doubt if "Aluminum Overcast" ever actually drops anything. Getting permission to do that would be pretty difficult (there is always the possibility of inadvertant drops) I would think. Even for active duty types on a scheduled mission, the paperwork and opportunities to explain onesself are quite amazing when you drop even a training round where it wasn't supposed to be. When I was an IP in the training command in S. Texas, we had a student that, unknowingly, lost a MK-76 (http://www.ordnance.org/practice.htm) onto a van parked in a town enroute to the target. The solo student leading the flight also was impressed by the effect of his taking the flight OVER the town instead of AROUND it as briefed. Oh, the IP's in the flight had no time to correct the situation as the town was just south of the field and the student was supposed to delay the departure turn to target until past it, but turned right after cleanup. No one saw the bomb leave the aircraft because it was #4 in the formation. He had a "no spot" during the runs but all aircraft were clean on joinup for the trip home. It was not until after they got back were the pieces put together as to what had actually happened. John Alger USN(ret) 1972-1997 // 1310,1320 TA-4J, A-7E, EC-130Q, P-3B |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I did not mean to indicate that these particular training bombs would be
filled with water and sand with a smoke charge! I was trying to educate those interested that this particular type of ORDNANCE was used in the distant pass. As you being an old Naval Aviator I would guess even before your time. I was a CWO Gunner (Aviation Ordnance) for 27 years and all tail hook squadrons, A4, A7, F4, & F-18. All combat squadrons. Please note the spelling of ORDNANCE. A lawyer I'm not! I once had a helo ride to the Pinecastle range in Florida and saw where Mk-76's repeatedly penetrated through both sides of M113A1 Armored Personnel Carriers. Check-six, Dick "John" wrote in message ... On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 02:42:54 -0400, "Richard Goldsberry" wrote: These "bombs" look like the training bombs filled with water and sand to approx. the weight of the real McCoy. Actually, they are likely filled with only air. The FAA gets really upset when you load live ordinance on a non-military (active) aircarft. Training loads with smoke charges actually fall in the same category. I doubt if "Aluminum Overcast" ever actually drops anything. Getting permission to do that would be pretty difficult (there is always the possibility of inadvertant drops) I would think. Even for active duty types on a scheduled mission, the paperwork and opportunities to explain onesself are quite amazing when you drop even a training round where it wasn't supposed to be. When I was an IP in the training command in S. Texas, we had a student that, unknowingly, lost a MK-76 (http://www.ordnance.org/practice.htm) onto a van parked in a town enroute to the target. The solo student leading the flight also was impressed by the effect of his taking the flight OVER the town instead of AROUND it as briefed. Oh, the IP's in the flight had no time to correct the situation as the town was just south of the field and the student was supposed to delay the departure turn to target until past it, but turned right after cleanup. No one saw the bomb leave the aircraft because it was #4 in the formation. He had a "no spot" during the runs but all aircraft were clean on joinup for the trip home. It was not until after they got back were the pieces put together as to what had actually happened. John Alger USN(ret) 1972-1997 // 1310,1320 TA-4J, A-7E, EC-130Q, P-3B |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Neat story. Thanks!
The "bombs" are just shells. As stated, it is now considered an experimental civilian aircraft, so no live-working armaments of any type are permitted. Most of the B17s I have had the chance to tour do not even have the motors for the turrets in them. Only the bubble attached to the fusalage. One note on the bomb bay doors, however. It seems that all B17s I have visited still have the bomb bay trap door mechanisms in-tact. This was in case a bomb were to come lose from the rack, the door would open under the weight of the bomb, and allow the bomb to fall free of the aircraft. You would'nt want a bomb rolling around in the plane! It also provided an emergency exit for many unfortunate crew members whose plane was going down. We were told on our flight that if we dropped something onto the doors while in the air, to let it lay there until we landed. If we tried to retrieve it in the air, we would exit the plane in a hurry. Russell Underwood |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
safety question: providing oxygen to a baby in the case of a drop of cabin pressure | [email protected] | General Aviation | 4 | August 27th 05 04:29 PM |
no RPM drop on mag check | Dave Butler | Owning | 19 | November 2nd 04 02:55 AM |
Drop in and say hello | Gilan | Home Built | 0 | June 4th 04 05:12 PM |
Drop in and say hello | Gilan | Owning | 0 | June 4th 04 05:12 PM |
Drop in and say hello | Gilan | Piloting | 0 | June 4th 04 05:12 PM |