Stupid Pilot Tricks

Larry Dighera wrote:
Are ultralights only subject to FAA Part 103, or must ultralight
pilots meet Part 91 regulations also?

Yes and no, respectively.

So, if it was a Part 103 ultralight, Part 91 is not applicable
rendering the sheriff's mention of remaining 500' from persons and
structures incorrect, no?

Somewhat, but they can still stick the pilot.
Sec. 103.9 Hazardous operations.

(a) No person may operate any ultralight vehicle in a manner that
creates a
hazard to other persons or property.-c

On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:20:36 -0700, "Gatt"
wrote in :



Larry Dighera wrote:
Are ultralights only subject to FAA Part 103, or must ultralight
pilots meet Part 91 regulations also?

Yes and no, respectively.

So, if it was a Part 103 ultralight, Part 91 is not applicable
rendering the sheriff's mention of remaining 500' from persons and
structures incorrect, no?

Somewhat, but they can still stick the pilot.
Sec. 103.9 Hazardous operations.

(a) No person may operate any ultralight vehicle in a manner that
creates a hazard to other persons or property.


While the FSDO inspector might initiate an administrative action
against a certificated airman under that regulation, I'm not sure what
would be appropriate for an unlicensed ultralight operator.

"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:20:36 -0700, "Gatt"
wrote in :



Larry Dighera wrote:
Are ultralights only subject to FAA Part 103, or must ultralight
pilots meet Part 91 regulations also?

Yes and no, respectively.

So, if it was a Part 103 ultralight, Part 91 is not applicable
rendering the sheriff's mention of remaining 500' from persons and
structures incorrect, no?

Somewhat, but they can still stick the pilot.
Sec. 103.9 Hazardous operations.

(a) No person may operate any ultralight vehicle in a manner that
creates a hazard to other persons or property.


While the FSDO inspector might initiate an administrative action
against a certificated airman under that regulation, I'm not sure what
would be appropriate for an unlicensed ultralight operator.


Might be workable against the Helicopter pilot who "forced" the landing.

Al G

"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...

(a) No person may operate any ultralight vehicle in a manner that
creates a hazard to other persons or property.

While the FSDO inspector might initiate an administrative action
against a certificated airman under that regulation, I'm not sure what
would be appropriate for an unlicensed ultralight operator.

Me either, but the issue is probably a bit different since there's
significant doubt that it's legally an ultralight.
So then it becomes an issue of a potentially unlicensed pilot in an
unregistered aircraft.

*thwap thwap thwap* Here comes DHS...

-c