![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just some general comments - not aimed at Dean's product...
LED has been touted as the end all and be all of lighting, replacing the incandescent bulb... However, the emperor's new clothes may be a bit revealing... First, is that LED lights require substantial heat sinks and adequate ventilation in order to function... (Dean's product looks competently designed for this)... Failure to adequately cool the LED will result in short service life... An adequate heat sink often erases any size advantage the LED started out with... Initial installation cost of LED light assembly is markedly higher than an incandescent... Colreg approved LED running lights for boats are downright expensive... Replacement cost of LED lighting that fails in service is vastly higher than simply replacing a $20 bulb... By the time the LED assembly is properly cooled with a heatsink the weight advantage of LED is markedly lessened... Voltage control is more stringent for proper functioning of LED light assemblies, as opposed to incandescent filament bulbs.. Dimmers for LED lights are expensive for technical reasons... In boats/yachts where extended operation from a battery set is a way of life there has been a rush to replace incandescent with LED due to it's more efficient use of watt hours... The experience with that has shown that LED has its place, but it is not a blanket replacement... For task lighting, such as spot lighting over a galley counter, the LED is excellent... It is also excellent for lighting of stair steps, in the head, inside of cabinets, drawers and closets, and night lights...For general cabin lighting (even lighting of large areas) the cold cathode and fluorescent lights are still preferred... For high intensity tasks, such as deck lights, anchor raising lights, and spot lights, the halogen bulb still reigns supreme... For a reading light, the jury is still out - and I personally have not found a light my eyes like better than the incandescent for extended periods of reading... For mast lights and running lights the LED is making progress, but initial cost and light output is still an issue... Things are never as simple as they seem... Now, this is not intended to begin a debate over Dean's product, it is simply remarks on what I have found in the 2 years of research for outfitting my boat... What that means in an aircraft is up to you... denny |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 25, 7:14 am, Denny wrote:
Just some general comments - not aimed at Dean's product... LED has been touted as the end all and be all of lighting, replacing the incandescent bulb... However, the emperor's new clothes may be a bit revealing... First, is that LED lights require substantial heat sinks and adequate ventilation in order to function... (Dean's product looks competently designed for this)... Failure to adequately cool the LED will result in short service life... An adequate heat sink often erases any size advantage the LED started out with... Initial installation cost of LED light assembly is markedly higher than an incandescent... Colreg approved LED running lights for boats are downright expensive... Replacement cost of LED lighting that fails in service is vastly higher than simply replacing a $20 bulb... By the time the LED assembly is properly cooled with a heatsink the weight advantage of LED is markedly lessened... Voltage control is more stringent for proper functioning of LED light assemblies, as opposed to incandescent filament bulbs.. Dimmers for LED lights are expensive for technical reasons... In boats/yachts where extended operation from a battery set is a way of life there has been a rush to replace incandescent with LED due to it's more efficient use of watt hours... The experience with that has shown that LED has its place, but it is not a blanket replacement... For task lighting, such as spot lighting over a galley counter, the LED is excellent... It is also excellent for lighting of stair steps, in the head, inside of cabinets, drawers and closets, and night lights...For general cabin lighting (even lighting of large areas) the cold cathode and fluorescent lights are still preferred... For high intensity tasks, such as deck lights, anchor raising lights, and spot lights, the halogen bulb still reigns supreme... For a reading light, the jury is still out - and I personally have not found a light my eyes like better than the incandescent for extended periods of reading... For mast lights and running lights the LED is making progress, but initial cost and light output is still an issue... Things are never as simple as they seem... Now, this is not intended to begin a debate over Dean's product, it is simply remarks on what I have found in the 2 years of research for outfitting my boat... What that means in an aircraft is up to you... denny Denny, You are correct that proper heat sinking is essential to preserving an LED. Exceeding the rated junction temperature of an LED will result in it failing long before its rated life. Our design guarantees that the LEDs will remain at least 40C below their maximum junction temperature of 150C even on the hottest day at full power. We have had many people come by our exhibit in the North Aircraft area wanting to know why the device has such a large heat sink and weighs 0.9 pounds (just under 1 pound). Most people who experiment with LEDs just hook them up to a current limiting resistor and call it good. That is really not a good practice for an airplane. Our product has a switching supply that regulates the LED current for an input voltage range of 9V to 36V which guarantees reliable operation. It is also protected against voltage spikes, ESD, and lightning transients. We have also conducted DO-160E RFI and conducted emissions tests to ensure that it does not interfere with radios or anything on the electrical system. To really appreciate how well our landing light works, you have to see it at night. We have demoed it to a few people after 9pm. We generate a lot more light than a 55W halogen at less that 1/2 the power. We arrived at Oshkosh at 12:15 on Saturday when the sun was very bright, and the controller at Fisk called us out as the high wing with blue stripes on the wings and flashing lights (wig wag mode was on). We were happy to hear that! Dean AeroLEDs LLC www.aeroleds.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dean,
Congrats on the new product. Make sure Julie at AOPA and the various mags get the press release. My knowledge of LEDs is: pick an LED, add a 1K resistor and a 9V and you're good to go - back from my hobby electronic days ![]() about the temperatures. Death Valley gets to 120-130F (I believe). If you run the LED as an anti-collision system during take/off and landing, couldn't you get about (or at least close to) the 150F? Thanks, Hilton wrote in message oups.com... On Jul 25, 7:14 am, Denny wrote: Just some general comments - not aimed at Dean's product... LED has been touted as the end all and be all of lighting, replacing the incandescent bulb... However, the emperor's new clothes may be a bit revealing... First, is that LED lights require substantial heat sinks and adequate ventilation in order to function... (Dean's product looks competently designed for this)... Failure to adequately cool the LED will result in short service life... An adequate heat sink often erases any size advantage the LED started out with... Initial installation cost of LED light assembly is markedly higher than an incandescent... Colreg approved LED running lights for boats are downright expensive... Replacement cost of LED lighting that fails in service is vastly higher than simply replacing a $20 bulb... By the time the LED assembly is properly cooled with a heatsink the weight advantage of LED is markedly lessened... Voltage control is more stringent for proper functioning of LED light assemblies, as opposed to incandescent filament bulbs.. Dimmers for LED lights are expensive for technical reasons... In boats/yachts where extended operation from a battery set is a way of life there has been a rush to replace incandescent with LED due to it's more efficient use of watt hours... The experience with that has shown that LED has its place, but it is not a blanket replacement... For task lighting, such as spot lighting over a galley counter, the LED is excellent... It is also excellent for lighting of stair steps, in the head, inside of cabinets, drawers and closets, and night lights...For general cabin lighting (even lighting of large areas) the cold cathode and fluorescent lights are still preferred... For high intensity tasks, such as deck lights, anchor raising lights, and spot lights, the halogen bulb still reigns supreme... For a reading light, the jury is still out - and I personally have not found a light my eyes like better than the incandescent for extended periods of reading... For mast lights and running lights the LED is making progress, but initial cost and light output is still an issue... Things are never as simple as they seem... Now, this is not intended to begin a debate over Dean's product, it is simply remarks on what I have found in the 2 years of research for outfitting my boat... What that means in an aircraft is up to you... denny Denny, You are correct that proper heat sinking is essential to preserving an LED. Exceeding the rated junction temperature of an LED will result in it failing long before its rated life. Our design guarantees that the LEDs will remain at least 40C below their maximum junction temperature of 150C even on the hottest day at full power. We have had many people come by our exhibit in the North Aircraft area wanting to know why the device has such a large heat sink and weighs 0.9 pounds (just under 1 pound). Most people who experiment with LEDs just hook them up to a current limiting resistor and call it good. That is really not a good practice for an airplane. Our product has a switching supply that regulates the LED current for an input voltage range of 9V to 36V which guarantees reliable operation. It is also protected against voltage spikes, ESD, and lightning transients. We have also conducted DO-160E RFI and conducted emissions tests to ensure that it does not interfere with radios or anything on the electrical system. To really appreciate how well our landing light works, you have to see it at night. We have demoed it to a few people after 9pm. We generate a lot more light than a 55W halogen at less that 1/2 the power. We arrived at Oshkosh at 12:15 on Saturday when the sun was very bright, and the controller at Fisk called us out as the high wing with blue stripes on the wings and flashing lights (wig wag mode was on). We were happy to hear that! Dean AeroLEDs LLC www.aeroleds.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The LEDs in that lantern are not as high output as the ones we are
using. We are using LEDs that cost over $3.00 each and can burn up to 3 Watts per LED. I seriously doubt the ones in your lantern come even close to that. snip of good stuff Thanks, Dean -- all of that makes good sense. I doubt my Chinese-made hand-held lantern would last long in the environment you described. I'm looking forward to seeing them... -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Come see us at Oshkosh | [email protected] | Piloting | 56 | August 31st 07 06:08 AM |
Oshkosh for a day | Nathan Young | Home Built | 6 | July 25th 05 04:07 AM |
Oshkosh | Dudley Henriques | Piloting | 2 | July 11th 05 11:35 PM |
How about this for GAC at Oshkosh? | Paul Tomblin | Piloting | 7 | August 13th 03 02:03 PM |
CQ Oshkosh, CQ Oshkosh | Warren & Nancy | Piloting | 4 | July 3rd 03 06:42 PM |