![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Canada is good to us homebuilders. The only downside is the $0.70 Canadian
dollar. We have an 'advanced ultralight' regulatory category which is a real loophole for heavy two-passenger 'ultralights' - which are actually anything under 1200lbs. Licensing for these can be a Rec pilot permit or Ultralight-instructor rating. For a homebuilt 1200lbs our regs are simlar to the US, but without the liability issues, one extra pre-closeout inspection and the Rec pilot permit makes life easier to fly anywhere in Canada with 1 passenger, non-complex, day VFR only. Cheers, Pete Europa A239 "Ed Wischmeyer" wrote in message ... I currently live in the Netherlands and I'm looking to relocate. I've long wanted to learn to fly and build a light (experimental and/or ultralight) airplane and I'm wondering which countries would be well suited for that, economically and with regards to permits/licenses. The US seems to be in the lead, but the Australian regulations just loosened up a whole lot. Don't know about the relative cost of living, taxes, and all that, or where the kits, fuel, etc, are cheaper. US insurance and liability are out of control, though. Maybe somebody else knows. Ed Wischmeyer |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Pete" wrote in
: Canada is good to us homebuilders. The only downside is the $0.70 Canadian dollar. We have an 'advanced ultralight' regulatory category which is a real loophole for heavy two-passenger 'ultralights' - which are actually anything under 1200lbs. Licensing for these can be a Rec pilot permit or Ultralight-instructor rating. For a homebuilt 1200lbs our regs are simlar to the US, but without the liability issues, one extra pre-closeout inspection and the Rec pilot permit makes life easier to fly anywhere in Canada with 1 passenger, non-complex, day VFR only. Very interesting, the 1200lbs. category. In US regulations, I recall a maximum speed in level flight for Ultralights, which was pretty low (don't recall the precise figure, something like 60mph), but I might be mixing something up there. Do you know if the Canadian "advanced ultralight" category has a speed limit? So far, good to homebuilders: US, Canada, Australia. A bit as I expected. Does anyone know about the conditions for homebuilders in Europe? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Very interesting, the 1200lbs. category. In US regulations, I recall a maximum speed in level flight for Ultralights, which was pretty low (don't recall the precise figure, something like 60mph), but I might be mixing something up there. Do you know if the Canadian "advanced ultralight" category has a speed limit? So far, good to homebuilders: US, Canada, Australia. A bit as I expected. Does anyone know about the conditions for homebuilders in Europe? Lukas -- France must be pretty good, as they seem to have more homebuilts than anyone else in Europe. Fred in Florida |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Fred in Florida" wrote in message ...
So far, good to homebuilders: US, Canada, Australia. A bit as I expected. Does anyone know about the conditions for homebuilders in Europe? Lukas -- France must be pretty good, as they seem to have more homebuilts than anyone else in Europe. You might ask on the Emerauders group on yahoo. Claude Piel was a prolific French designer, and a lot of his designs are flying in Europe and the UK. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 17:16:33 GMT, "Fred in Florida"
wrote: Very interesting, the 1200lbs. category. In US regulations, I recall a maximum speed in level flight for Ultralights, which was pretty low (don't recall the precise figure, something like 60mph), but I might be mixing something up there. Do you know if the Canadian "advanced ultralight" category has a speed limit? So far, good to homebuilders: US, Canada, Australia. A bit as I expected. Does anyone know about the conditions for homebuilders in Europe? Lukas -- France must be pretty good, as they seem to have more homebuilts than anyone else in Europe. Fred in Florida Hello, There are a lot of designs from France, but regulations and the cost of flying are overwhelming, unless you choose ultralights. Still, you'll pay as much over there for a litre than you'd pay in the US for a gallon! Gil. -- http://planenews.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
the list of advanced ultralights acceptable here in Canada:
http://www.tc.gc.ca/civilaviation/ge...ncedullist.htm just take your pick. I don't believe there is a max speed, just a min indicated stall speed of 45mph (I think). Cheers, Pete Europa builder A239 "Lukas" wrote in message . 6.83... Do you know if the Canadian "advanced ultralight" category has a speed limit? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 11:12:40 -0400, Pete wrote:
Canada is good to us homebuilders. The only downside is the $0.70 Canadian dollar. We have an 'advanced ultralight' regulatory category which is a real loophole for heavy two-passenger 'ultralights' - which are actually anything under 1200lbs. Licensing for these can be a Rec pilot permit or Ultralight-instructor rating. For a homebuilt 1200lbs our regs are simlar to the US, but without the liability issues, one extra pre-closeout inspection and the Rec pilot permit makes life easier to fly anywhere in Canada with 1 passenger, non-complex, day VFR only. Cheers, Pete Europa A239 "Ed Wischmeyer" wrote in message ... I currently live in the Netherlands and I'm looking to relocate. I've long wanted to learn to fly and build a light (experimental and/or ultralight) airplane and I'm wondering which countries would be well suited for that, economically and with regards to permits/licenses. The US seems to be in the lead, but the Australian regulations just loosened up a whole lot. Don't know about the relative cost of living, taxes, and all that, or where the kits, fuel, etc, are cheaper. US insurance and liability are out of control, though. Maybe somebody else knows. Ed Wischmeyer Back before the events of 11 Sept 01, I would have said Canada and the US were pretty much a toss up in terms of freedom of flying. Each had their advantadges and disadvantages. But now I think Canada comes out ahead. No pop-up TFRs. No TFRs around nuclear reactors or sporting events. No security Nazis at the TSA. Also, there is a Notice of Proposed Amendment to the Canadian Aviation Regulations that will officially legalize hiring out the building of a homebuilt aircraft (if it ever gets approved). See: http://www.tc.gc.ca/civilaviation/RegServ/Affairs/carac/NPAs/MM/Archives/jun01/2001050.htm -- Kevin Horton RV-8 (finishing kit) Ottawa, Canada http://go.phpwebhosting.com/~khorton/rv8/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
bulding a kitplane maybe Van's RV9A --- a good idea ????? | Flightdeck | Home Built | 10 | September 9th 03 07:20 PM |
personal property tax on homebuilt aircraft | Stu Fields | Home Built | 18 | September 6th 03 03:29 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 4 | August 7th 03 05:12 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |