![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Danny Deger wrote:
In another thread I am in a discussion on radar capability for FAA "Centers". My recollection is that they typically have no primary radar, thus no capability to paint weather. Someone is telling me they do. Anybody out there have the answer. Maybe some do and some don't, and the ones I used in the past don't. The answer is "it depends." Many enroute U.S. radar sites DO have primary radar coverage. However there are also plenty so-called "beacon only" sites that only interogate transponders. These sites are less expensive to install, particularly in remote areas where installations and electric is at a premium. The long term trend of FAA was to have less and less full blown primary radar coverage, similar to what many other countries were already doing for their civil aviation. The FAA's strategy changed in September, 2001. Primary coverage will be with us to stay, and may even be expanded in some areas. Air traffic control radar is optimized and sized for finding airplanes, not rain drops. Newer center facilities use weather radar (Nexrad) to provide their weather information on their screens. I highly recommend taking a tour of any local TRACON and ARTCC facilities. You will need a pre-approved appointment and may have to provide your information well in advance. Participating as part of a small group (such as an instrument ground school course) may be helpful. The new center and approach faciltiies have wonderful equipment and radar displays. I cringe whenever I hear a politician say that we haven't invested a penny in air traffic control for forty years. It took a long time, yes, but the upgrades are paying dividends. Now to redesign the airspace maps...... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Owen wrote: The FAA's strategy changed in September, 2001. Yes. Primary coverage will be with us to stay, and may even be expanded in some areas. Radar's days are limited. After ADS-B gets rolled out radar sites will be decommissioned. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Newps" wrote Radar's days are limited. After ADS-B gets rolled out radar sites will be decommissioned. So, will all GA aircraft be required to have an ADS-B system onboard? -- Jim in NC |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Newps wrote: Primary coverage will be with us to stay, and may even be expanded in some areas. Radar's days are limited. After ADS-B gets rolled out radar sites will be decommissioned. Primary radar will remain in the NAS until the US Air Defense Sectors aren't required to monitor the NAS. Civilian ATC might not use them, the NORAD, etc will still require primary radars. -- Bob Noel (goodness, please trim replies!!!) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 6, 10:29 pm, Newps wrote:
Owen wrote: The FAA's strategy changed in September, 2001. Yes. Primary coverage will be with us to stay, and may even be expanded in some areas. Radar's days are limited. After ADS-B gets rolled out radar sites will be decommissioned. Maybe but my guess is maybe not. Air Traffic Control might "primary" off of some other form of "radio direction and ranging" but 9/11 pointed out that "primary" still does its job. I am 40...if I Live as long as my Father has (so far) or my Great Grandfather (106) I suspect that "primary" is still radiating. Robert |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Newps writes:
Owen wrote: The FAA's strategy changed in September, 2001. Primary coverage will be with us to stay, and may even be expanded in some areas. Radar's days are limited. After ADS-B gets rolled out radar sites will be decommissioned. I doubt that. I've no doubt they'll be downgraded, but as much as the FAA would love to unplug them, other folks will object. That said, while the primary radar exists; I hear it's less and less well maintained. Hopefully it can still spot invading Zeppelins but lesser targets...? [Pre WWII, the Germans flew the Graf Zeppelin airship around looking to see if the British had radar. Trouble was, they were not listening anywhere near the ~30 Mhz freq. used by the Brit's system.. Needless to say, to Chain Home it must have looked like a parachute flare in a pitch black darkroom...] -- A host is a host from coast to & no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433 is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FWD: Article "Logan to get radar to detect ships - Monitoring could improve flow of air traffic" | Jon | Piloting | 0 | April 18th 07 09:22 PM |
FWD: Article "Logan to get radar to detect ships - Monitoring could improve flow of air traffic" | Jon | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | April 18th 07 09:22 PM |
Old polish aircraft TS-8 "Bies" ("Bogy") - for sale | >pk | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | October 16th 06 07:48 AM |
"Are you worried about all those non-green colors on the radar?" | Peter R. | Instrument Flight Rules | 35 | May 26th 06 01:19 AM |