US Coverup of Me-262 Mach Flight

(B2431) wrote:

And as any truthful RAF Sea Vixen driver would attest, not to mention
the P-38's relatively dirty twin boom design.

-Mike Marron


Two booms?...isn't that the signature of an a/c achieving mach
one?. So the P-38 IS supersonic then?.
--

-Gord.

Gord, not to put too fine a point on it, but that reeks. What's worse is I
didn't think of it first.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Heh heh...couldn't resist...you get the wingless 130 going?...
shudder
--

-Gord.

..you get the wingless 130 going?...
shudder
--

-Gord.

I am still looking for a copy of that clip.

Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired

B2431 wrote:
..you get the wingless 130 going?...
shudder
--

-Gord.

I am still looking for a copy of that clip.

http://jameshart.mine.nu/ngs/c-a30_down.avi
7 MB though.
That the one?

--
James...
http://www.jameshart.co.uk/

In article ,
"James Hart" wrote:

B2431 wrote:
..you get the wingless 130 going?...
shudder
--

-Gord.

I am still looking for a copy of that clip.

http://jameshart.mine.nu/ngs/c-a30_down.avi

Error, file no longer there.

7 MB though.
That the one?

Someday the real history of Mach flight will be revealed as well as
the German disc aircraft programs of the Third Reich

I ask again, what disc aircraft program? What are your sources?

If you are thinking of the "Flying Pankcake" that was a Vought aircraft built
ins the U.S. and actually flew.

Take a look at the website you cited and you will also find denials of the
existance of gas chambers, murder of Jews..etc which makes tens of thousands
of Germans, Soviets, French, U.S., British etc military and civil personnel all
liars and I am not referring to Jewish personnel. Amazing how everyone is out
to blame the poor, innocent Nazis for the murder of 6 million Jews and 6
million non jews.

Tell you what, make a website stating the human race didn't exist before 100
years ago and you will have loonies crawling out from under the same rocks as
the Holocaust deniers like you came from.

Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired

On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 02:32:52 GMT, "Gord Beaman" )
wrote:

Mike Marron wrote:

(Corey C. Jordan) wrote:

If any WWII fighter was least likely to get near Mach 1, it was the P-38
with its 0.68 critical Mach.

And as any truthful RAF Sea Vixen driver would attest, not to mention
the P-38's relatively dirty twin boom design.

-Mike Marron


Two booms?...isn't that the signature of an a/c achieving mach
one?. So the P-38 IS supersonic then?.

Actually, it must have been hyper-sonic since both booms arrived at
the same time :-)

Al Minyard

In article , Gord Beaman
?@?.? writes
Two booms?...isn't that the signature of an a/c achieving mach
one?. So the P-38 IS supersonic then?.

Reminds me of Richard Nobel's SSC team scoreboard in the desert,
something like 'Spirit of America - 650; Thrust SSC - Boom Boom'.

--
John

Alan Minyard wrote:

On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 02:32:52 GMT, "Gord Beaman" )
wrote:

Mike Marron wrote:

(Corey C. Jordan) wrote:

If any WWII fighter was least likely to get near Mach 1, it was the P-38
with its 0.68 critical Mach.

And as any truthful RAF Sea Vixen driver would attest, not to mention
the P-38's relatively dirty twin boom design.

-Mike Marron


Two booms?...isn't that the signature of an a/c achieving mach
one?. So the P-38 IS supersonic then?.

Actually, it must have been hyper-sonic since both booms arrived at
the same time :-)

Al Minyard

....plus they were likely parallel booms too, eh?


--

-Gord.

"Gord Beaman" )

wrote:...plus they were likely parallel booms too, eh?


--

Gord......stop!...STOP!! Ya got me on the floor!! Whoooweeee!!!
VL

In article ,
"James Hart" wrote:

Steve Hix wrote:
In article ,
"James Hart" wrote:

B2431 wrote:
..you get the wingless 130 going?...
shudder
--

-Gord.

I am still looking for a copy of that clip.
http://jameshart.mine.nu/ngs/c-a30_down.avi


Error, file no longer there.

Try again, server's been taking a bit of a hit with a file that size but a
dozen or so have grabbed it so far according to the logs.

Still down. :{

I'll try again later.