What GA needs

On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 20:04:09 +0200, Mxsmanic wrote:

Matt Barrow writes:

Around here, a two year old 172 goes for $105, wet.

So that's still only 1.5 hours for the cost of a pair of expensive sneakers.
The sneakers will last for months or years; once that 1.5 hours of flying time
is gone, there's nothing.


Might as well kill yourself now, then, because the rest of your life is
just going to cost more money.




randall g =%^) PPASEL+Night 1974 Cardinal RG
http://www.telemark.net/randallg
Lots of aerial photographs of British Columbia at:
http://www.telemark.net/randallg/photos.htm
Vancouver's famous Kat Kam: http://www.katkam.ca

"randall g" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 20:04:09 +0200, Mxsmanic wrote:

Matt Barrow writes:

Around here, a two year old 172 goes for $105, wet.

So that's still only 1.5 hours for the cost of a pair of expensive
sneakers.
The sneakers will last for months or years; once that 1.5 hours of flying
time
is gone, there's nothing.


Might as well kill yourself now, then, because the rest of your life is
just going to cost more money.

Your grasp is astonishing.

randall g writes:

Might as well kill yourself now, then, because the rest of your life is
just going to cost more money.

I'm not sure how you arrived at this conclusion.

Dave J wrote:

Snip


But I struggle to find time and cash to keep this hobby up. Lately, I
have rediscovered digital photography. I can't help but notice that it
also is a skill and craft, with plenty of technical stuff to nail
down, and even at its most expensive, it's a lot cheaper than
aviation. And my wife does not worry about me getting killed taking
photos. There's an appeal to that.

-- dave j




Just be careful of what you take pictures of....
--

Regards, Ross
C-172F 180HP
KSWI

On Sep 11, 9:49 am, Ross wrote:

Just be careful of what you take pictures of....

Ah, yes, there's always the possibility of getting killed as a
consequence of having taken certain pictures.

-- dave j