![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Just finished a good read on the most recent Iraq war, "Embedded," by--drat! brain function failure again!--anyway, the online booksellers will have the details. It's a series of vignettes of various embedded reporters' adventures. I know that doesn't sound like much, but it really is a rip-roaring good read, and gives a very graphic depiction of the horror house that was Saddam's Iraq. Goes on the shelf with "The March Up." There are a couple of unflattering anecdotes about embedded correspondents in The March Up, including one where a European? reporter is seen looting an Iraqi store. (Marines were looting too, but they got scorched by the sergeant major. Nobody scorched the reporter.) But the neatest touch in the book is when the commander of the 1st Marine Div decides to enter East Baghdad in force, based on his knowledge of the warm greeting his marines were getting in the city. This intelligence he garnered by looking at the TV in his tent, which was tuned to CNN. There was a CNN camera crew embedded in his forward patrol. Incidentally, I have sat in on a few conversations with returning military types, plus read some letters and e-mails from folks still in country, and there certainly does seem to be a huge disconnect between what they are saying about conditions in Iraq and what is reported on the news. Something is screwy. Well, I don't know. Is it screwy or just standard operating procedure? all the best -- Dan Ford email: www.danford.net/letters.htm#9 see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|