|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
September 12th 07, 04:50 AM
posted to rec.aviation.piloting
|
|||
|
|||
What GA needs
"JGalban via AviationKB.com" u32749@uwe wrote in message news:7814f2bf2e916@uwe... Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe wrote: Nothing wrong with the physics. Small turbines work. And for some applications they have big adavantages. Fuel quantity per horsepower-hour, however, isn't one of them. Agreed. Turbines are most efficient well above normal GA altitudes. At common GA altitudes they suck large quantities of fuel. A turbine powered Luscombe project used to be based at my field. The speed and climb were slightly better than a piston powered Luscombe, but the range was dramatically shorter. A Luscombe needs a turbine engine like a carp needs an outboard motor. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
