![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The foolish buyer trick I've seen more often than others is the "It comes
with a fresh annual, I don't need a pre-purchase inspection." approach to airplane buying. Anyone who accepts this is crazy. Another of the aircraft still on the field wouldn't pass a run-up. Why? It had been filled with autofuel some time back, not flown or run for a while, and the fuel system was badly gummed up. Oh, by the way, there is no autofuel STC for this airplane. Again, this airplane had a fresh annual. How long was "a while"? Unleaded mogas won't "gum up" anything for years -- unless, of course, the mogas had ethanol in it. Then it will supposedly start attacking rubber seals. How does an A&P sign off an annual inspection on a plane that won't pass a run-up test? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message ups.com... The foolish buyer trick I've seen more often than others is the "It comes with a fresh annual, I don't need a pre-purchase inspection." approach to airplane buying. Anyone who accepts this is crazy. Another of the aircraft still on the field wouldn't pass a run-up. Why? It had been filled with autofuel some time back, not flown or run for a while, and the fuel system was badly gummed up. Oh, by the way, there is no autofuel STC for this airplane. Again, this airplane had a fresh annual. How long was "a while"? Unleaded mogas won't "gum up" anything for years -- unless, of course, the mogas had ethanol in it. Then it will supposedly start attacking rubber seals. Auto gas (and maybe avgas too) leaves behind a laquer like residue if it is allowed to evaporate. That's one of the reasons people encourage draining gas tanks when vehicles are stored for a long time. How does an A&P sign off an annual inspection on a plane that won't pass a run-up test? Same question for the airplane with a blown crankshaft seal. A suspicious person might be inclined to believe the AI never turned a wrench on the aircraft. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 09/12/07 19:53, Jay Honeck wrote:
The foolish buyer trick I've seen more often than others is the "It comes with a fresh annual, I don't need a pre-purchase inspection." approach to airplane buying. Anyone who accepts this is crazy. Another of the aircraft still on the field wouldn't pass a run-up. Why? It had been filled with autofuel some time back, not flown or run for a while, and the fuel system was badly gummed up. Oh, by the way, there is no autofuel STC for this airplane. Again, this airplane had a fresh annual. How long was "a while"? Unleaded mogas won't "gum up" anything for years -- unless, of course, the mogas had ethanol in it. Then it will supposedly start attacking rubber seals. How does an A&P sign off an annual inspection on a plane that won't pass a run-up test? Do you know the airplane couldn't pass the run-up at the time of the annual inspection? All we know is that it didn't pass the run-up *now*. -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane, USUA Ultralight Pilot Cal Aggie Flying Farmers Sacramento, CA |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
The foolish buyer trick I've seen more often than others is the "It comes with a fresh annual, I don't need a pre-purchase inspection." approach to airplane buying. Anyone who accepts this is crazy. Although I always recommend an independent prepurchase inspection to prospective buyers, I bought my last airplane with a "fresh annual". It turned out that the plane was annualed by a mechanic that I knew and trusted, who would have been the only guy in the area I would have hired for the prepurchase inspection. He gave me access to the full shop work order (i.e. all of the details of the work done) and pointed out things he thought might need attention in the future. Buying a plane that has had a fresh annual from someone I don't know would definitely not happen. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) -- Message posted via AviationKB.com http://www.aviationkb.com/Uwe/Forums...ation/200709/1 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 12, 9:53 pm, Jay Honeck wrote:
The foolish buyer trick I've seen more often than others is the "It comes with a fresh annual, I don't need a pre-purchase inspection." approach to airplane buying. Anyone who accepts this is crazy. In other words, the fact that an aircraft passed an annual inspection means absolutely nothing. BTW - I agree with you. It does mean nothing. Just a few months ago, someone I know bought a Cherokee 180. It just went through annual. I have a friend who is an A&P/IA who has been a mechanic for decades, but never finished 8th grade. Unsurprisingly, he is very good at swinging wrenches but barely made it through the A&P and IA written exams and is not so good at paperwork. As a result, I wind up doing his paperwork (AD searches, entries, etc.) and he winds up doing a lot of work on my airplane. Works out for everyone, and also lets me see what kind of crap is flying out there, and how badly some A&P's/IA's are screwing their customers. One would expect, given a brief look at the paperwork, that the AD's were all up to date. Instead of the (now thankfully rare) "All AD's C/ W" entry, there was a complete printout made with one of the commercial software packages, done on the computer. Problem with computers is this - garbage in, garbage out. The equipment list showed the airplane had an Edo-Aire transponder. The AD list showed that the AD on the KT-76A transponder was complied with. The plane actually had a Narco AT-150 transponder. There's an AD on that one, and it was never checked. There was an AD on an oxygen bottle that the IA claimed he complied with by refilling the bottle. Sounds good - this is the required action - only there was no oxygen bottle, and never had been. An AD on the air filter was shown to have been complied with by replacement of the filter element and terminated. Only problem - element replacement was not a terminating action, and in any case the AD didn't apply to installations on that model of engine. It was like that all down the line. Unnecessary work done, work claimed that could not possibly have been done, and important things that should have been checked left unchecked. That's really pretty normal for the planes out there. Another of the aircraft still on the field wouldn't pass a run-up. Why? It had been filled with autofuel some time back, not flown or run for a while, and the fuel system was badly gummed up. Oh, by the way, there is no autofuel STC for this airplane. Again, this airplane had a fresh annual. How long was "a while"? Unleaded mogas won't "gum up" anything for years -- unless, of course, the mogas had ethanol in it. Then it will supposedly start attacking rubber seals. Not true. Leave unleaded mogas in your lawnmower for a year, and it likely won't start. Autogas lacks the stabilizer package found in avgas. No big deal if you fly regularly, but a real issue if you don't. Of course you could just add Stabil to the autogas, and that would work - but I doubt that's covered by STC. Not that anyone would know. How does an A&P sign off an annual inspection on a plane that won't pass a run-up test? It takes an IA to sign off an annual - and he can do so without ever seeing it run. That's because a lot of the things that normally get done at annual are not part of the annual inspection, and can be done by an A&P without the IA or even by the owner. Realize that if you have a plain vanilla spam can, you can legally do about 90% of the work required for a legal annual and routine service. It works like this: Make an appointment with your friendly IA for the afternoon, and that morning fly the plane for an hour or so (to get the cylinders nice and warm), then land. If you have the Bendix magneto switch, check to make sure you can use it to shut off the engine (it's an AD, but you're allowed to do it yourself) before you park it. Wash the plane (not a serious job, just enough to inspect). Put it on jacks, pull off the wheel pants (if any), wheels, and all inspection covers. Service the struts with air (nitrogen if you have it, but I doubt it makes a difference) and fluid (5606). Top off the brake reservoir (5606 again). If your battery can be serviced with acid and/or water, service it - otherwise just put the charger on it. Or replace it. Change your ELT battery if it needs it. Pull out the seats and the floor inspection panels. Lube all the pulleys, replace any missing safety wire or cotter keys. Clean everything up, spray some Corrosion- X in there. Pull off the engine cowls, wash down the engine. Pull out the plugs, clean, gap, reinstall the bottom ones. Change the oil (and filter if present). Now wait for your IA, and meanwhile log what you did (don't forget to make the AD entry if your Bendix switch is covered). You haven't overstepped your authority as pilot-owner - everything I noted is something the owner is allowed to do. It leaves precious little for the IA to do. When he shows up, I doubt he will care about starting the engine. He will probably just check compressions and magneto timing, inspect the cables, pulleys, and other moving parts with flashlight and mirror, check whatever other things the type requires (it's usually only a few things, generally by AD) and call it good. He doesn't need to see the engine run. You can put it all back together later all by yourself. It's all legal - but just because an engine passes the compression check and magneto timing check, that does not mean it will run. Michael |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Michael" wrote some great advice
snipped Just finished everything you mentioned plus removed/stripped/painted/reassembled/relabeled wheels, mounted new tires with new tubes, new bearings/cups, new seals, and all new hardware. Brakes were done a year ago and still good. Changed 2 cylinders and a prop governor under the oversight of my A&P. Logged over 130 hours (ok I'm slow) of wrenching before and after our annual inspection, which only took our IA 6 hours. BTW, those computerized printouts are great for a new owner to research each and every AD. Buy a copy of the manufacturers SB/SL's on CD and cross reference each SB/SL that may be referenced in the AD. Then go through your log books to learn exactly what AD's have been complied with and use the SB/SL's to learn how the compliance was accomplished. Note the log book page and date as a reference to save your IA some of his time and some of your $. One belly pan to reinstall and then an ops check and the Aztec will be RTS. Jim |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
("Jim Burns" wrote)
Logged over 130 hours (ok I'm slow) of wrenching before and after our annual inspection... Co-owner meeting: "Next item on the agenda, who's turn is it to wash the plane - Jim?" Jim: "Hehehehe-hahahaha. Good one...! You guys crack me up." Montblack |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
whose
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How long was "a while"? Unleaded mogas won't "gum up" anything for
years -- unless, of course, the mogas had ethanol in it. Then it will supposedly start attacking rubber seals. Not true. Leave unleaded mogas in your lawnmower for a year, and it likely won't start. Autogas lacks the stabilizer package found in avgas. You know, I've heard that ever since I started using mogas in my planes, but I've never seen a cite, nor have I *ever* noticed a problem with unleaded gasoline in *any* of my lawn mowers, leaf blowers, or snow blowers. I put 'em away in the spring/winter, and start 'em up the following winter/summer -- and away we go. Same with my Honda Goldwing -- I top it off, and it just sits till next year. No troubles. Can anyone point me to anything that proves (or disproves) the "fact" that unleaded mogas deteriorates faster than avgas? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
You know, I've heard that ever since I started using mogas in my planes, but I've never seen a cite, nor have I *ever* noticed a problem with unleaded gasoline in *any* of my lawn mowers, leaf blowers, or snow blowers. I put 'em away in the spring/winter, and start 'em up the following winter/summer -- and away we go. Same with my Honda Goldwing -- I top it off, and it just sits till next year. No troubles. My experience as well. Last spring I got my chainsaw down from the garage attic. It had been *at least* 10 years since I had started it. Topped up the tank and it ran fine. I used to run the gas out of the carb on my lawnmower in the fall. Stopped doing it and it didn't make any difference. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Airport buyer may have been murdered. | George Patterson | Piloting | 16 | June 23rd 05 01:57 AM |
Containerize plane to international buyer | tbm700 | Owning | 9 | February 22nd 05 05:50 PM |
Containerize plane to international buyer | tbm700 | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | February 19th 05 05:07 PM |
First Time Buyer. Help! | KayInPA | Owning | 82 | April 15th 04 04:31 AM |
NEW BUYER PLEASE HELP | Tony | Owning | 9 | July 24th 03 03:07 PM |