A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

running over-square



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 17th 07, 05:57 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Dan Luke[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 713
Default running over-square


"Maxwell" wrote:


Is John with the CPA or Lycoming? Just wondering what Lycoming thinks of the
recommendations.


CPA

The settings I mentioned, and some that are even more over-square, are listed
as permissable in the POH.

Here's what I found in a Lycoming flyer for a higher-power version of the
TIO-540:

"A power setting of 2200 RPM and 31" Hg manifold pressure is recommended for
all cruise flight."


--
Dan
T-182T at BFM


  #2  
Old September 18th 07, 01:38 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mortimer Schnerd, RN[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 597
Default running over-square

Dan Luke wrote:
The settings I mentioned, and some that are even more over-square, are listed
as permissable in the POH.

Here's what I found in a Lycoming flyer for a higher-power version of the
TIO-540:

"A power setting of 2200 RPM and 31" Hg manifold pressure is recommended for
all cruise flight."



Your quotation refers to a turbocharged engine which by definition would always
be operated oversquare in cruise anyway. I doubt you will ever see 31" of
manifold pressure in a normally aspirated engine. They just can't do it.

That being said, I have been a long time fan of using the lowest RPM I can get
away with for cruise flight mostly because of my experience with bigger twins.
The slower they turn, the quieter they are, and the less tired everybody in
earshot becomes.

I look for whatever combination of low RPM and manifold pressure can give me
65-75% power. I still want the speed but don't need the extra noise trying to
get an extra 7 knots out of the beast. All things in moderation...



--
Mortimer Schnerd, RN
mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com



  #3  
Old September 18th 07, 03:13 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Dan Luke[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 713
Default running over-square


"Mortimer Schnerd, RN" wrote:

"A power setting of 2200 RPM and 31" Hg manifold pressure is recommended
for
all cruise flight."



Your quotation refers to a turbocharged engine which by definition would
always be operated oversquare in cruise anyway. I doubt you will ever see
31" of manifold pressure in a normally aspirated engine. They just can't do
it.


My engine is a turbocharged engine.

http://tinyurl.com/2jskz7


That being said, I have been a long time fan of using the lowest RPM I can
get away with for cruise flight mostly because of my experience with bigger
twins. The slower they turn, the quieter they are, and the less tired
everybody in earshot becomes.


Yep.

--
Dan
T-182T at BFM


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
600 square miles? Hilton Piloting 6 September 8th 07 04:39 PM
the square end of the Kiev Dave Kearton Aviation Photos 0 March 2nd 07 06:10 AM
Back to square one on buying an Arrow Jack Allison Owning 51 March 26th 05 04:53 AM
presidential TFR - 3,291 statute miles square! Larry Dighera Piloting 47 June 15th 04 06:08 PM
square tube aluminum homebuilt Joa Home Built 0 October 21st 03 01:16 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.