Weekly News Statistics for demon.local: week ending 14 Sep 2007.

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 09:44:21 +0100, Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 03:31:31 +0100, Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 08:37:15 +0100, Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 00:22:09 +0100, Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:
All you have proven is you have less of a life than me.

Au contraire, PHucker. If anything, I lead a more vibrant life than
you.

A vibrant life on usenet, yes ok......

And elsewhere. At least I don't have parrots squawking about the place
at all hours.

They shut up at night.

What? You tape their little beaks up?

I switch the lights off.

I see. Butt, of course, you wouldn't! A0L!

What?

You wouldn't see with the lights off.

2. anonym............................................ : 115 16.4 8.7%
3. ah...............................................: 75 10.7 5.7%
4. @@^.............................................. : 73 10.4 5.5%
5. John \"C\.........................................: 68 9.7 5.2%
6. Paul {Hamilton Rooney}............................: 62 8.9 4.7%
7. Naked Gonad.......................................: 54 7.7 4.1%
8. Mr Pounder........................................: 53 7.6 4.0%
9. Peter Hucker......................................: 50 7.1 3.8%

A0L! Barely scraped into the top 10.

Is it possible to brush your teeth without wiggling your ass?

Why would you wiggle your arse when brushing you teeth? ... oh!

Conservation of angular momentum.

On what basis do you make that k'lame?

Physics.

What does that have to do with arses, PHucker?

Angular arse rotation is due to physics.

I suspect you like to get physical with arses.

Obsession noted.

Yes, I have noted your obsession.

When they found out their wives were attending a sex-toy party,
the husbands refused to go and pick them up,
and instead left them to their own devices.

That was lame.

But amusing.

Indeed.

[Bows]

Don't flatter yourself.

You did it for me.

I did not!

If it's zero degrees outside today and it's supposed to be twice as cold tomorrow, how cold is it going to be?

Why ask me?

I was asking the group in general. Don't think the group is all about you. Egotist.

Well, its not all about you.

Nevertheless, the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition is not to be
considered in determining the traditional practice of grammarians. Thus a
subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds is not
subject to the strong generative capacity of the theory. Of course, the
notion of level of grammaticalness is necessary to impose an interpretation
on the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance
scope of a complex symbol. Conversely, any associated supporting element is
to be regarded as an abstract underlying order. Furthermore, this analysis
of a formative as a pair of sets of features does not readily tolerate
irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules.

Come again?