A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

F4U corsair mods to make it suitable for carrier landings.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 29th 07, 02:19 PM posted to rec.aviation.military.naval
Andrew Robert Breen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15
Default F4U corsair mods to make it suitable for carrier landings.

In article om,
wrote:
When tested by the USN it was found that the Corsair was not suitable
for use on carriers:
1 Long nose obscured sight of the deck
2 oil leaks over cockpit glass
3 undercarriage oleos would bottom out and bounce the aircraft of the
landing wire
4 Abrupt stall.

The royal Navy overcame 1 via a curved semi-circular approach and 2 by
wiring the cowling shut over the windows.

How were all of the other problems solved to allow carrier opperations?


In the Corsair I the solution to 3. and 4. was to "be more careful
landing". Corsair II had modified valving in the oelos, still needed care
around the stall. Above is partially from Norman Hanson's "Carrier Pilot",
partially directly from Norman himself (years ago).

--
Andy Breen ~ Not speaking on behalf of the University of Wales, Aberystwyth
Feng Shui: an ancient oriental art for extracting
money from the gullible (Martin Sinclair)
  #3  
Old October 1st 07, 05:50 AM posted to rec.aviation.military.naval
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10
Default F4U corsair mods to make it suitable for carrier landings.

On Sep 30, 2:24 am, Orval Fairbairn wrote:
In article ,
(Andrew Robert Breen) wrote:



In article om,
wrote:
When tested by the USN it was found that the Corsair was not suitable
for use on carriers:
1 Long nose obscured sight of the deck
2 oil leaks over cockpit glass
3 undercarriage oleos would bottom out and bounce the aircraft of the
landing wire
4 Abrupt stall.


The royal Navy overcame 1 via a curved semi-circular approach and 2 by
wiring the cowling shut over the windows.


How were all of the other problems solved to allow carrier opperations?


In the Corsair I the solution to 3. and 4. was to "be more careful
landing". Corsair II had modified valving in the oelos, still needed care
around the stall. Above is partially from Norman Hanson's "Carrier Pilot",
partially directly from Norman himself (years ago).


They also lengthened the tailwheel oleo strut, so the "at rest" attitude
of the aircraft approximated the landing attitude.


An extended tail yoke was something that incidentally also belatedly
solved the landing and takeoff problems of late model Me 109s. (Some
Me 109G-10 and all Me 109K). Near its three point attitude the
circulation caused by the propeller prop caused one wing to stall
before the other. An extended yoke also increases ground visibility.
A contra rotating prop probably would also have helped solve the
problem as well as eliminate gyroscopic precession which also tends to
otherwise cause a swing on takeoff.

  #4  
Old October 1st 07, 06:05 AM posted to rec.aviation.military.naval
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10
Default F4U corsair mods to make it suitable for carrier landings.

On Sep 30, 12:19 am, (Andrew Robert Breen) wrote:
In article om,

wrote:
When tested by the USN it was found that the Corsair was not suitable
for use on carriers:
1 Long nose obscured sight of the deck
2 oil leaks over cockpit glass
3 undercarriage oleos would bottom out and bounce the aircraft of the
landing wire
4 Abrupt stall.


The royal Navy overcame 1 via a curved semi-circular approach and 2 by
wiring the cowling shut over the windows.


How were all of the other problems solved to allow carrier opperations?


In the Corsair I the solution to 3. and 4. was to "be more careful
landing". Corsair II had modified valving in the oelos


Propably a tapering rod that closed of the oriface through which the
oleo oil flowed as the strut compressed.
This would then tend to absorb the impact energy of landing and
convert it into turbulent oil and heat instead
of simply storing it and then releasing it.



--
Andy Breen ~ Not speaking on behalf of the University of Wales, Aberystwyth
Feng Shui: an ancient oriental art for extracting
money from the gullible (Martin Sinclair)



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Another Corsair pic for Russell - Another Corsair pic.jpg (1/1) Just Plane Noise[_2_] Aviation Photos 2 July 26th 07 12:36 PM
Another Corsair pic for Russell - Another Corsair pic.jpg (0/1) Just Plane Noise[_2_] Aviation Photos 1 July 26th 07 03:28 AM
the USS Eisenhower Carrier Battle Group doesn't make for a 'massive' build-up for war with Iran AirRaid Naval Aviation 137 October 24th 06 09:10 AM
Aircraft suitable for zero g flight David Findlay Aerobatics 2 July 23rd 05 02:43 PM
A suitable way to go on this NG? Quilljar Simulators 4 January 17th 05 09:05 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.