URGENT: British on board with coming air strikes on Iran (according to what Seymour Hersh mentioned in the following interview with Wolf Blitzer on CNN yesterday morning):

wrote:

URGENT: British on board with coming air strikes on Iran (according to
what Seymour Hersh mentioned in the following interview with Wolf
Blitzer on CNN yesterday morning):

You guys are barking mad.

The likelihood of the RAF bombing Iran is as close to zero as it could possibly get. An
absence of legal authority would probably mean the RAF wouldn't comply with any such
(political) orders. There would be public uproar here not least for being America's
puppet again.

We want to get out of the damn region not stir it up.

Graham

On Oct 1, 7:27 am, Eeyore
wrote:
wrote:
URGENT: British on board with coming air strikes on Iran (according to
what Seymour Hersh mentioned in the following interview with Wolf
Blitzer on CNN yesterday morning):

You guys are barking mad.

The likelihood of the RAF bombing Iran is as close to zero as it could possibly get. An
absence of legal authority would probably mean the RAF wouldn't comply with any such
(political) orders. There would be public uproar here not least for being America's
puppet again.

We want to get out of the damn region not stir it up.

Graham

Seymour Hersh has been so discredited (ever since his utterly false
allegations about the KAL 007 shootdown) that no one except the more
gullible segments of the controversy-loving American media would pay
the slightest attention to anything he said. This silliness just adds
to his fact-free view of the world.

Matt wrote:
On Oct 1, 7:27 am, Eeyore
wrote:
wrote:
URGENT: British on board with coming air strikes on Iran (according to
what Seymour Hersh mentioned in the following interview with Wolf
Blitzer on CNN yesterday morning):
You guys are barking mad.

The likelihood of the RAF bombing Iran is as close to zero as it could possibly get. An
absence of legal authority would probably mean the RAF wouldn't comply with any such
(political) orders. There would be public uproar here not least for being America's
puppet again.

We want to get out of the damn region not stir it up.

Graham

Seymour Hersh has been so discredited (ever since his utterly false
allegations about the KAL 007 shootdown) that no one except the more
gullible segments of the controversy-loving American media would pay
the slightest attention to anything he said. This silliness just adds
to his fact-free view of the world.

Hey, who needs facts when one has delusions? KAL 007 was shot down
by the single bullet that took out JFK when it ricocheted off of Jimmy
Hoffa.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Dan wrote:

Matt wrote:

On Oct 1, 7:27 am, Eeyore
wrote:

wrote:

URGENT: British on board with coming air strikes on Iran (according to
what Seymour Hersh mentioned in the following interview with Wolf
Blitzer on CNN yesterday morning):

You guys are barking mad.

The likelihood of the RAF bombing Iran is as close to zero as it
could possibly get. An
absence of legal authority would probably mean the RAF wouldn't
comply with any such
(political) orders. There would be public uproar here not least for
being America's
puppet again.

We want to get out of the damn region not stir it up.

Graham


Seymour Hersh has been so discredited (ever since his utterly false
allegations about the KAL 007 shootdown) that no one except the more
gullible segments of the controversy-loving American media would pay
the slightest attention to anything he said. This silliness just adds
to his fact-free view of the world.

Hey, who needs facts when one has delusions? KAL 007 was shot down by
the single bullet that took out JFK when it ricocheted off of Jimmy Hoffa.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired


Dan, no one with *brain* needs Seymour Hersh to see that the Bush
administration is playing from the same script, they were successful to
launch their aggression against Iraq. A aggression on Iran has already
been decided, in my opinion. The question is, what is after that?

So far Bush, the neocons quest for world domination has been a disaster
for our country, but for the military industrial complex and the oil
interest. With the support of the Democrats, don't be fooled by their
seeming resistance to the war, it will go on for a long time. Until our
nation is hollowed out by its imperial wars.

dapra wrote:

Dan wrote:

Matt wrote:

On Oct 1, 7:27 am, Eeyore
wrote:

wrote:

URGENT: British on board with coming air strikes on Iran (according to
what Seymour Hersh mentioned in the following interview with Wolf
Blitzer on CNN yesterday morning):

You guys are barking mad.

The likelihood of the RAF bombing Iran is as close to zero as it
could possibly get. An
absence of legal authority would probably mean the RAF wouldn't
comply with any such
(political) orders. There would be public uproar here not least for
being America's
puppet again.

We want to get out of the damn region not stir it up.

Graham


Seymour Hersh has been so discredited (ever since his utterly false
allegations about the KAL 007 shootdown) that no one except the more
gullible segments of the controversy-loving American media would pay
the slightest attention to anything he said. This silliness just adds
to his fact-free view of the world.

Hey, who needs facts when one has delusions? KAL 007 was shot down by
the single bullet that took out JFK when it ricocheted off of Jimmy Hoffa.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired


Dan, no one with *brain* reads Seymour Hersh .......

typo fixed.

redc1c4,
that also explains your fascination with his idiocies. %-)
--
"Enlisted men are stupid, but extremely cunning and sly, and bear
considerable watching."

Army Officer's Guide

redc1c4 wrote:

dapra wrote:

Dan wrote:


Matt wrote:


On Oct 1, 7:27 am, Eeyore
wrote:


wrote:


URGENT: British on board with coming air strikes on Iran (according to
what Seymour Hersh mentioned in the following interview with Wolf
Blitzer on CNN yesterday morning):

You guys are barking mad.

The likelihood of the RAF bombing Iran is as close to zero as it
could possibly get. An
absence of legal authority would probably mean the RAF wouldn't
comply with any such
(political) orders. There would be public uproar here not least for
being America's
puppet again.

We want to get out of the damn region not stir it up.

Graham


Seymour Hersh has been so discredited (ever since his utterly false
allegations about the KAL 007 shootdown) that no one except the more
gullible segments of the controversy-loving American media would pay
the slightest attention to anything he said. This silliness just adds
to his fact-free view of the world.


Hey, who needs facts when one has delusions? KAL 007 was shot down by
the single bullet that took out JFK when it ricocheted off of Jimmy Hoffa.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired


Dan, no one with *brain* reads Seymour Hersh .......


typo fixed.

redc1c4,

What else do you fix, redc1c4?

Do you fix the two millions of Iraqis forced to leave their country as
'freedom to travel, explore the world'?

Do you fix an other two millions of Iraqis forced to leave their homes
because of ethnic cleansing as 'free to live wherever they choose to live'?

I think, you did fix already that the close to 4 thousands American
soldiers did not die for the oil interests of the corporate oligarchy,
but for 'our freedom and democracy'.

What a fixer, you are redc1c4!

On Oct 1, 9:50?am, Matt wrote:
Seymour Hersh has been so discredited (ever since his utterly false
allegations about the KAL 007 shootdown) that no one except the more
gullible segments of the controversy-loving American media would pay
the slightest attention to anything he said. This silliness just adds
to his fact-free view of the world.

Sources please. How has Hersh been discredited?

Walt

On Oct 1, 6:04 pm, Walt wrote:
On Oct 1, 9:50?am, Matt wrote:

Seymour Hersh has been so discredited (ever since his utterly false
allegations about the KAL 007 shootdown) that no one except the more
gullible segments of the controversy-loving American media would pay
the slightest attention to anything he said. This silliness just adds
to his fact-free view of the world.

Sources please. How has Hersh been discredited?

Walt

Hersh claimed the Space Shuttle was involved in relaying KAL data even
though it was on an unclassified mission and had no suitable
equipment. Add that zero documentation or testimony has ever been
produced, and how does Hersh retain any credibility whatsoever?

Matt wrote:


Hersh claimed the Space Shuttle was involved in relaying KAL data even
though it was on an unclassified mission and had no suitable
equipment. Add that zero documentation or testimony has ever been
produced, and how does Hersh retain any credibility whatsoever?


I think that confuses Hersh with the claims of a certain Tony Devereux,
originally published under the pseudonym P. Q. Mann.

Devereux's speculations have been roundly dicredited. Hersh's seem to
have fared considerably better.

So far as I know, Hersh never claimed any space shuttle - KAL 007
connection.

Cheers,

Walt wrote:

On Oct 1, 9:50?am, Matt wrote:
Seymour Hersh has been so discredited (ever since his utterly false
allegations about the KAL 007 shootdown) that no one except the more
gullible segments of the controversy-loving American media would pay
the slightest attention to anything he said. This silliness just adds
to his fact-free view of the world.

Sources please. How has Hersh been discredited?

Walt

his existence is enough to do that.

redc1c4,
(talk about a carbon debt to Gaia.... %-)
--
"Enlisted men are stupid, but extremely cunning and sly, and bear
considerable watching."

Army Officer's Guide