A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Global Hawk



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 2nd 07, 05:23 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,767
Default Global Hawk

On Oct 1, 10:33 pm, Richard Riley wrote:
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:02:44 -0400, john smith
wrote:

In article . com,
"Robert M. Gary" wrote:


The pilot also said that they are all very confused as to why the GH
is based out of an area of such high air traffic. He said he thought
the military was originally going to base them out of an island owned
by the Navy off the cost of LA where there is really no GA traffic.


Come on Robert, that is an easy answer.... politics!


Well, Beal isn't exactly Los Alamitos. Sure, there's traffic there,
but it's not that much.

Basing them off shore would have been a LOT more expensive. There's
no infrastructure there, it would all have to be built.


There is a massive Navy base.

-Robert

  #2  
Old October 2nd 07, 11:46 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,953
Default Global Hawk

On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 09:23:09 -0700, "Robert M. Gary"
wrote in
. com:

Basing them off shore would have been a LOT more expensive. There's
no infrastructure there, it would all have to be built.


There is a massive Navy base.


I suppose that depends on your definition of 'massive.'

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=e...&t=h&z=15&om=1
http://tinyurl.com/27ofxh
  #3  
Old October 3rd 07, 12:34 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Maxwell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,116
Default Global Hawk


"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 09:23:09 -0700, "Robert M. Gary"
wrote in
. com:

Basing them off shore would have been a LOT more expensive. There's
no infrastructure there, it would all have to be built.


There is a massive Navy base.


I suppose that depends on your definition of 'massive.'


Any idea what else the base is currently being use for?


  #4  
Old October 3rd 07, 11:23 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,953
Default Global Hawk

On Tue, 2 Oct 2007 18:34:41 -0500, "Maxwell" wrote
in :

Any idea what else the base is currently being use for?


I had always heard over the years, that San Nicolas Island was part of
a missile testing range, but that's just rumor.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fairford - "Fairford 2007 - RQ-4A Global Hawk.jpg" yEnc (2/2) Mr.D[_2_] Aviation Photos 0 July 19th 07 10:23 PM
Fairford - "Fairford 2007 - RQ-4A Global Hawk.jpg" yEnc (1/2) Mr.D[_2_] Aviation Photos 0 July 19th 07 10:23 PM
Global Hawk Weather Platform? [email protected] Military Aviation 2 September 10th 04 02:20 PM
Arming Global Hawk Draws Conflicting Comments From Pentagon Larry Dighera Military Aviation 5 July 14th 03 08:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.