A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Essential and Dispensible WW2 aircraft.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 3rd 07, 04:19 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval
Gordon[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 57
Default Essential and Dispensible WW2 aircraft.

On Oct 3, 6:44 am, Eunometic wrote:

The tragedy of the Me 210 was that the problem were known even before
the moment the test pilot stepped out of the aircraft on its maiden
flight. He said that the tail needed to be lengthened by 1 meter or
so. To do that over 5million reich marks of jigs would need to be
scrapped. So instead slats were tried, these didn't work and actually
made things worse, a single large as opposed to two fins was tried;
that didn't work. When the Me 210C was ordered by the Hungarian air
force they bypassed the managerial and political problems and
incorporated the lengthened tail and slats which worked brilliantly
together.


I knew the Luftwaffe test pilot assigned to the Hungarian 210 project
until he passed away recently. He crashed the prototype due to a
switchology f*-up that at first was blamed on him, but eventually was
exonerated. He was a combat-scarred Bf 110 veteran (literally) that
was lucky to survive an attack on a HSS'd B-17 that set both his
aircraft and himself on fire. Given the choice to take over a desk or
a transfer to the Hungarian test program, he chose the latter.
According to Zittier, the uplock switch was not the German-designed
one, and as soon as he lifted off, the landing gear folded up, leaving
him out in the middle of a plowed field on his belly. Unhurt and with
little damage to the aircraft, he quickly returned to the air and
proved just how well the modifications worked. There were literally
no performance issues with the Hungarian machines and it threw a lot
of egg on the RLM's collective faces.

Gordon

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Two essential items... john smith Piloting 19 December 26th 06 02:48 AM
Delaware LLC Owned Aircraft California Based Aircraft ChrisEllis Piloting 6 January 17th 06 03:47 AM
Commercial rating: complex aircraft required aircraft for practical test? Marc J. Zeitlin Piloting 22 November 24th 05 04:11 AM
Exclusive Custom Home Plans, and Essential information about building your New Home orange tree Home Built 4 November 20th 05 04:37 PM
Experience transitioning from C-172 to complex aircraft as potential first owned aircraft? Jack Allison Owning 12 June 14th 04 08:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.