![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-10-11 15:57:17 -0700, daffy said:
Quite a good article in the Nov/Dec AARP magazine titled "Listening for Quiet". It talks about a silent sanctuary in Washington's Olympic National park. The article concluded by someone complaining about the silence broken by a small plane. The article said "The small plane flying north more than doubles the ambient sound, and we react to the intruder as a threat, drawing in, tracking the source, hunching for cover until the last traces of engine noise finally die away." The Olympic National Park covers much of northwestern Washington, including a great deal of the coast, all of the Olympic Mountains, the Hoh Rain Forest, and much else. It is bordered by important airports that serve coastal towns, Indian reservations, and international travel. There are several airports within the boundaries of the park. There are also several military training areas in and around the park. There is a narrow corridor between the park and Sub Base Bangor which is one of the major routes for traffic flying Canada, the San Juan Islands, Bremerton, Tacoma, Olympia, and Seattle. Most aircraft avoid flying over the Olympic Mountains because it is relatively dangerous, rugged territory prone to unpredictable weather and icing. Because of the park's location, however, and the fact that the park is broken into two sections, it is not always possible to fly a route around the park. It can mean adding several hours to a flight to go around. Not only that, but bad weather in the Strait of Juan de Fuca, on the coast, or on Puget Sound can leave you little choice. Pilots do try to maintain at least 2000' above wild areas as requested by the National Park Service. However, planes taking off or landing obviously are going to have to fly lower than 2000.' There are additional aircraft that fly lower than 2000' for scientific and law enforcement purposes, as well as search and rescue, fire fighting, and surveying. Specially equipped airplanes regularly fly at low level over the park as part of the effort to control our borders, fight smuggling, and look for terrorist activity. Some areas completely bounded by the park are managed lands set aside for tree farming. There are aircraft actively involved in logging there. Boeing and some airlines have been known to conduct training flights at low altitude over the park. Aviation is a huge and necessary part of the activity at Olympic National Park, perhaps more so than any other park in the nation. Many peoples' lives and much of the health of the park itself are dependent on it. If you want to get away from airplanes and their noise, Olympic National Park is a poor choice. -- Waddling Eagle World Famous Flight Instructor |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 11, 9:03 pm, C J Campbell
wrote: Pilots do try to maintain at least 2000' above wild areas as requested by the National Park Service. However, planes taking off or landing obviously are going to have to fly lower than 2000.' There are additional aircraft that fly lower than 2000' for scientific and law Where can I find the rules and regulations that specify how high or low a plane can fly over various terrain, like cities, wilderness, etc. Also, is there an easy way from the ground to measure the height of a flying plane? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Airbus wrote in :
In article . com, says... On Oct 11, 9:03 pm, C J Campbell wrote: Pilots do try to maintain at least 2000' above wild areas as requested by the National Park Service. However, planes taking off or landing obviously are going to have to fly lower than 2000.' There are additional aircraft that fly lower than 2000' for scientific and law Where can I find the rules and regulations that specify how high or low a plane can fly over various terrain, like cities, wilderness, etc. AIM Also, is there an easy way from the ground to measure the height of a flying plane? NO Actually, the FARs rule, not the AIM. -- Marty Shapiro Silicon Rallye Inc. (remove SPAMNOT to email me) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-10-12 14:56:44 -0700, daffy said:
On Oct 11, 9:03 pm, C J Campbell wrote: Pilots do try to maintain at least 2000' above wild areas as requested by the National Park Service. However, planes taking off or landing obviously are going to have to fly lower than 2000.' There are additional aircraft that fly lower than 2000' for scientific and law Where can I find the rules and regulations that specify how high or low a plane can fly over various terrain, like cities, wilderness, etc. Also, is there an easy way from the ground to measure the height of a flying plane? The Federal Aviation Regulations can be found in most bookstores and pilot shops. However, there really aren't many rules. Federal Aviation Regulation 91.119 spells out the minimum safe altitude for VFR aircraft. Remember, this is a safety rule, not a noise abatement rule (although crashing airplanes are pretty noisy): ---------- §*91.119***Minimum safe altitudes: General. Except when necessary for takeoff or landing, no person may operate an aircraft below the following altitudes: (a) Anywhere. An altitude allowing, if a power unit fails, an emergency landing without undue hazard to persons or property on the surface. (b) Over congested areas. Over any congested area of a city, town, or settlement, or over any open air assembly of persons, an altitude of 1,000 feet above the highest obstacle within a horizontal radius of 2,000 feet of the aircraft. (c) Over other than congested areas. An altitude of 500 feet above the surface, except over open water or sparsely populated areas. In those cases, the aircraft may not be operated closer than 500 feet to any person, vessel, vehicle, or structure. (d) Helicopters. Helicopters may be operated at less than the minimums prescribed in paragraph (b) or (c) of this section if the operation is conducted without hazard to persons or property on the surface. In addition, each person operating a helicopter shall comply with any routes or altitudes specifically prescribed for helicopters by the Administrator. ---------- As you can see, the above is a general rule. There are numerous exceptions. Some areas are restricted airspace and have their own minimum altitude requirements. Also, some wildlife areas, including all of Olympic National Park, as well as almost all other state and national parks, nature preserves, and so forth, 'request' that, except when taking off and landing, you remain 2000 feet above them. Note that this is a request. It does not have the force of law and it is not a regulation. There are many reasons it cannot be made a regulation. However, a pilot who regularly violates this request without a very good reason is likely to get a phone call from park officials. Since no one goes and paints a blue dotted line on the ground around all these areas, pilots who are unfamiliar with an area may inadvertently fly too low over a preserve. We also are subject to the same rules as everyone else about approaching marine mammals too closely or harassing them. When we are on the water we are boats and are governed by the Coast Guard and have the same rules as all other boats. Some Wilderness Areas have airfields in them, although they are rare and maintained for historic reasons, fire-fighting, or some sort of compromise worked out with pilots and other interest groups in order to get the area designated as wilderness. The USDA Forest Service is usually responsible for these fields and they are generally run with a strict view to minimizing the impact on wilderness. Due to the fact that planes come in all shapes, colors and sizes there is no good way to tell how high they are or how far away they are. Airplanes can appear to be closer or farther away at different times of the day or night and in different weather, too. This is a big issue with pilots. After all, we do not want to run into each other and some simple method of determining how far away a plane is would be quite welcome. Besides, we don't like being buzzed by low flying planes any more than anyone else. If we want to see low flying planes we go to the airport. Pilots don't like jerks and we have ways of dealing with them. Although everyone, including the pilots, find airplane noise objectionable, aircraft are possibly the ultimate in leave-no-trace visits to parks. Many pilots are rabid environmentalists because we see the overall effects of environmental damage that are not visible or difficult to comprehend from the ground. It is not difficult, for example, to see what parts of Hood Canal are dead or dying, or where a forest is blighted. We can also see the trash left by humans everywhere, the bears rummaging through it, and the results of drunken nitwits who are careless with fire. We can see where criminals have cleared off public forest lands in order to raise pot. If noisy airplanes bother you, come for a ride and most of us can show you stuff that will really raise your blood pressure. You are possibly aware that large areas of Olympic National Park may have to be closed to hiking. Much of the forest is dying, as are many of the meadows, because people have packed down the earth around the trees and left human excrement several inches deep covering several acres around the beaches and other popular spots. Some of that silence you hear is the silence of death. No birds. No animals. Hardly even a leaf stirring. Think about it. -- Waddling Eagle World Famous Flight Instructor |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Anybody else listening to Pilotcast? | Paul Tomblin | General Aviation | 3 | May 14th 07 08:24 PM |
Is listening to ATC useful? | 601XL Builder | Piloting | 2 | October 16th 06 02:06 AM |
Is listening to ATC useful? | Dan Luke | Piloting | 0 | October 15th 06 04:42 PM |
Is listening to ATC useful? | tjd | Piloting | 0 | October 15th 06 05:13 AM |
Listening to ATC at Oshkosh | Chief McGee | Home Built | 2 | July 24th 05 09:04 PM |