![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My 2000 Accord got a new (rebuilt?, remanufactured?)
transmission at 96,000 miles. Thank you, Honda. Honda must have realized they had a bad batch of automatic transmissions because they extended the warranty on my Accord's tranny from 36,000 miles to 100,000 miles. As mentioned above, it got replaced at 96,000 miles. Now at 201,000 miles, it's still shifting as required and not making any nasty or strange noises. I also had a transmission oil cooler installed earlier this year. By the way, the car towed the trailer nicely up to about 70 mph. However, weather (winds) and traffic (large trucks hauling ass), could make the car/trailer sway a little with speeds over 70 mph. Below that speed, it seemed pretty steady to me. In calm air and not many trucks, it was steady at 80 mph, but I felt more comfortable at 65 to 70 mph. I really don't like the idea of having to get rid of it just because the damned tow hitch won't stay attached. Sigh. Well, my brother still has the 1968 Chrysler New Yorker four door 'hard top' (no 'b' pillar between the doors) and 440 cubic inch gas guzzler V8. And, it still has a trailer hitch on it for the times many, many years past when dad pulled the camping trailer with it. Naaahhhhh! Ray I have an '01 Odyssey, 120k miles, new tranny at 108k (thank you Honda). Watch out for the 01-04 years (I think). Very problematic transmissions. Do your research before buying a used one. www.odyclub.com Otherwise, excellent vehicles. Tows a 1-26 on an open trailer quite nicely - but nowhere near 75% of that dragging the trailer. -Pete #309 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 16, 2:18 pm, Ray Lovinggood
wrote: My 2000 Accord got a new (rebuilt?, remanufactured?) transmission at 96,000 miles. Thank you, Honda. Honda must have realized they had a bad batch of automatic transmissions because they extended the warranty on my Accord's tranny from 36,000 miles to 100,000 miles. As mentioned above, it got replaced at 96,000 miles. Now at 201,000 miles, it's still shifting as required and not making any nasty or strange noises. I also had a transmission oil cooler installed earlier this year. By the way, the car towed the trailer nicely up to about 70 mph. However, weather (winds) and traffic (large trucks hauling ass), could make the car/trailer sway a little with speeds over 70 mph. Below that speed, it seemed pretty steady to me. In calm air and not many trucks, it was steady at 80 mph, but I felt more comfortable at 65 to 70 mph. I really don't like the idea of having to get rid of it just because the damned tow hitch won't stay attached. Sigh. Well, my brother still has the 1968 Chrysler New Yorker four door 'hard top' (no 'b' pillar between the doors) and 440 cubic inch gas guzzler V8. And, it still has a trailer hitch on it for the times many, many years past when dad pulled the camping trailer with it. Naaahhhhh! Ray I have an '01 Odyssey, 120k miles, new tranny at 108k (thank you Honda). Watch out for the 01-04 years (I think). Very problematic transmissions. Do your research before buying a used one. www.odyclub.com Otherwise, excellent vehicles. Tows a 1-26 on an open trailer quite nicely - but nowhere near 75% of that dragging the trailer. -Pete #309- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Ray, Go to a "trailer hitch shop" and see if they can re-inforce the Accord. I'm sure something can be done to beef up the hitch attach points. I've seen this done on uni-body cars before. Dave |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ray Lovinggood" wrote:
I really don't like the idea of having to get rid of it just because the damned tow hitch won't stay attached. I just canīt believe there is no solution to the hitch problem. Try to find a hitch that attaches to the structure that holds the rear bumper, not some sheet metal of the trunk, and keep the car. Michael |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ray,
Have you looked into Subaru Foresters and Outbacks? They tow good, and if you can resist the turbo options the gas mileage is fine. They are all wheel drive so if you landout in a field you'll have better traction than the front wheel drive cars. I've got 73000 trouble free miles on my Forester. Chris |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris,
Yes, I am considering the Forester. I know you and RQ tow with turbo versions, but I would look ONLY at the normally aspirated models because I don't want to pay for the premium octane fuel required for the turbo models. The tough adjustment will be that I've been "corrupted" by the additional power of a V6 and I don't know what it will be like to tow with a four cylinder, again. Also, both the Forester and the Outback are smaller than the Accord which will take some time to adjust to. The 07 Forester is rated to tow 2,400 lbs, but I don't know what the max tongue weight is. Probably 10% of the max trailer weight. So, I guess I'm looking for a good, used, Forester. One good thing: Time is on my side. My flying is done for the winter and I don't have to worry about towing it anywhere for a while. Ray On Oct 21, 10:44 pm, chris wrote: Ray, Have you looked into Subaru Foresters and Outbacks? They tow good, and if you can resist the turbo options the gas mileage is fine. They are all wheel drive so if you landout in a field you'll have better traction than the front wheel drive cars. I've got 73000 trouble free miles on my Forester. Chris |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 22, 5:22 am, rlovinggood wrote:
Chris, Yes, I am considering the Forester. I know you and RQ tow with turbo versions, but I would look ONLY at the normally aspirated models because I don't want to pay for the premium octane fuel required for the turbo models. The tough adjustment will be that I've been "corrupted" by the additional power of a V6 and I don't know what it will be like to tow with a four cylinder, again. Also, both the Forester and the Outback are smaller than the Accord which will take some time to adjust to. The 07 Forester is rated to tow 2,400 lbs, but I don't know what the max tongue weight is. Probably 10% of the max trailer weight. So, I guess I'm looking for a good, used, Forester. One good thing: Time is on my side. My flying is done for the winter and I don't have to worry about towing it anywhere for a while. Ray On Oct 21, 10:44 pm, chris wrote: Ray, Have you looked into Subaru Foresters and Outbacks? They tow good, and if you can resist the turbo options the gas mileage is fine. They are all wheel drive so if you landout in a field you'll have better traction than the front wheel drive cars. I've got 73000 trouble free miles on my Forester. Chris- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I think my 05 Outback is rated for 200 lbs tongue weight and 2,700 trailer weight. It has the factory hitch. It's in the shop right now for an unrelated matter so I can't check. It's the regular 2.5i version, non-turbo 168 hp. Drives 70-80 no problem through New Mexico with a Cobra trailer and a 570 lb glider and other gear in the trailer. This is mostly on I-40 and some highways. There are places it would probably go a little slower here though. Bob |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Yes, I am considering the Forester. I know you and RQ tow with turbo versions, but I would look ONLY at the normally aspirated models because I don't want to pay for the premium octane fuel required for the turbo models. There is a fellow pilot at Truckee (elev. 5,900') who tows his Genesis 2 in a Cobra fiberglass top trailer using a normally aspirated Subaru Forrester. I'm not sure of the vehicle's year but its the generation before the current one, maybe a 2003. He has towed it from sea level and over the Sierra Nevadas without complaints or incident. So I wuold imagine that a Forrester will be more than enough tow vehicle at your elevation. He also likes the car's AWD capability as he lives in the Sierras where it snows heavily during the winters. As an aside, not all AWD systems are equal. Most systems favor FWD and do not engage the rear wheels unitl slippage is detected in the front wheels. Subarus have several versions of AWD depending upon the model but they have continuous AWD in common, always sending power to all four wheels. To see how Subaru AWD compares to the competion see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XyLgYskj-oc and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7dVF...elated&search= |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tow Vehicle Woes | rlovinggood | Soaring | 25 | October 18th 07 10:40 PM |
Saturn V Vehicle for the Apollo 4 Mission in the Vehicle Assembly Building 6754387.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 12th 07 01:38 AM |
license woes | gen | Piloting | 30 | November 10th 06 08:03 PM |
Volkslogger woes | Dan Rihn | Soaring | 10 | March 25th 04 03:10 PM |