![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 22 Oct, 22:33, John Smith wrote:
Brian wrote: Frightening? Really? It actually works very well with a bit of head wind. Backcountry power pilots occasionally use this technique as well. It's a completely different thing in a power plane. (Although I wouldn't recommend it with power planes, either.) A short look at a typical glider polar is all that is needed to understand why your "technique" is a no-no. If you continue using it, then it's only a question of time that we'll hear about you in the news. Anyone tried option 4? Stuffing the nose right down for 3 or 4 seconds will easily lose you 50m or more with only a small increase in airspeed since Newton gets involved in the exercise. A bit of increased spoiler will overcome that increase quickly. What's more you are playing with the safe side of the energy curve! To the poster who said that condor may not be a good tool to test this. I suggest you try a copy. It really is a great sim and the flight dynamics are superb. I believe that Lasham gliding club took one ab-initio student right to solo standard on a sim before one or two real circuits to get him away. Sims have come a long way. Ian M |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 23, 6:30 am, nimbusgb wrote:
....snip... To the poster who said that condor may not be a good tool to test this. I suggest you try a copy. It really is a great sim and the flight dynamics are superb. I believe that Lasham gliding club took one ab-initio student right to solo standard on a sim before one or two real circuits to get him away. Sims have come a long way. Ian M I am planning on buying a copy and for general flying and basic training I see great value in simulators. But the original posting was about doing a flight test to determine performance such as descent rates with spoilers extended, turns back to the airport, etc. Any such data requires that not only does the simulator have all the right aerodynamics models, but that it has complete and accurate data for your specific model of glider. I doubt that Condor has test flown every glider model extensively enough to confirm the accuracy of their results. BTW, I program flight simulators for SIkorsky AIrcraft. One of my bosses has a rule "all simulators are guilty until proven innocent" Todd Smith |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MA-8 with parachute extended S63-00693.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 10th 07 02:52 PM |
spoilers vs. ailerons | [email protected] | Piloting | 36 | August 8th 05 11:24 AM |
Frozen spoilers | stephanevdv | Soaring | 0 | November 4th 04 05:24 PM |
Extended GPX Schema | Paul Tomblin | Products | 0 | September 25th 04 02:44 AM |
L-13 Spoilers | Scott | Soaring | 2 | August 27th 03 06:08 AM |