![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-11-06 09:14:28 -0800, Jon said:
Just got this today in e-mail, forwarded from an Aviation Daily piece. I imagine this should **** of a few people. ========================== DHS Wants GA Aircraft Screened Before Flights To U.S. The Dept. of Homeland Security plans to extend the security requirements now applicable to Part 135 charter operators to a wider range of general aviation operators and also wants GA aircraft and passengers flying into the U.S. to undergo security screening before takeoff, DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff said Monday. That would be a good trick. How would you do it? Say you are in Mexico at some airport which does not even have a phone, let alone Internet access. Currently you can take off and call Customs as long as you give Customs notice 60 minutes before crossing the border. Now, they want a security screen of your passengers before you even take off? How do you do that? This is going to kill a lot of humanitarian programs in Mexico that depend on volunteer pilots. The earlier Customs proposal was completely unworkable, now this. What kind of fantasy world to these people live in? Last I looked, Alaska was part of the United States of America. How come these guys want to screen flights from Alaska? -- Waddling Eagle World Famous Flight Instructor |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 14:25:41 -0800, C J Campbell
wrote: That would be a good trick. How would you do it? Say you are in Mexico at some airport which does not even have a phone, let alone Internet access. Currently you can take off and call Customs as long as you give Customs notice 60 minutes before crossing the border. Now, they want a security screen of your passengers before you even take off? How do you do that? This is going to kill a lot of humanitarian programs in Mexico that depend on volunteer pilots. The earlier Customs proposal was completely unworkable, now this. What kind of fantasy world to these people live in? Last I looked, Alaska was part of the United States of America. How come these guys want to screen flights from Alaska? Did you miss the part where it mentioned Pt 135?? Pt 91/GA is going to have to use the same procedure/system that Pt 135 has been using for quite some time. https://eapis.cbp.dhs.gov/ TC |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article 2007110621085416807-christophercampbell@hotmailcom,
C J Campbell wrote: What, does DHS think DHS doesn't think. Don't expect the impossible from such a group. (-{ -- Bob Noel (goodness, please trim replies!!!) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 21:08:54 -0800, C J Campbell
wrote: Great, if you have Internet access. But in Mexico a lot of airports do not even have phones, let alone Internet access. What, does DHS think that if it commands people to register over the Internet, that all the necessary equipment will just suddenly appear in a flash of pink smoke? I understand what you are saying, and am not disagreeing, but you are urinating into the wind. FWIW, the Pt 135 people were mandated to use the EAPIS system before it was operational-so evidently they were counting on "a flash of pink smoke". Call around to a couple of smaller Pt 135 operations and ask them what it takes to haul a box of freight into the US...I think you will find that most of them tried to "comply" and gave up. Strange thing is a bunch of auto parts seem to be made in either Mexico or Canada these days. TC |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
C J Campbell writes:
Great, if you have Internet access. But in Mexico a lot of airports do not even have phones, let alone Internet access. What, does DHS think that if it commands people to register over the Internet, that all the necessary equipment will just suddenly appear in a flash of pink smoke? Perhaps there are people in DHS who would simply like to put an end to all private aviation. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: C J Campbell writes: Great, if you have Internet access. But in Mexico a lot of airports do not even have phones, let alone Internet access. What, does DHS think that if it commands people to register over the Internet, that all the necessary equipment will just suddenly appear in a flash of pink smoke? Perhaps there are people in DHS who would simply like to put an end to all private aviation. A bit like you. Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
12 April 1952 Spokane "Spokesman's Review" article | Don Pyeatt | Aviation Photos | 1 | June 2nd 07 02:56 PM |
FWD: Article "Logan to get radar to detect ships - Monitoring could improve flow of air traffic" | Jon | Piloting | 0 | April 18th 07 09:22 PM |
FWD: Article "Logan to get radar to detect ships - Monitoring could improve flow of air traffic" | Jon | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | April 18th 07 09:22 PM |
Old polish aircraft TS-8 "Bies" ("Bogy") - for sale | >pk | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | October 16th 06 07:48 AM |
ATC "cancellation" of scheduled carrier flights? | Marc J. Zeitlin | Instrument Flight Rules | 19 | August 27th 06 01:51 PM |