![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 9, 5:46 pm, Greg Arnold wrote:
Marc Ramsey wrote: Greg Arnold wrote: Paul Remde wrote: Hi Dave, Yes. SeeYou gets airspeed and wind data from the 302. The 302 calculates the wind - not SeeYou. So the 302A not only is a logger, but also has a computer that calculates wind? No, the 302 flight computer calculates wind. The 302A flight recorder does not... Marc The 303 manual says that the 303 calculates the wind. Why would it do that if the 302 does the same thing? I don't understand why Cambridge would go to the expense of putting a wind calculation computer in the 302 when the 302 always will be connected to another instrument (303 or PDA) that can calculate the wind. Basically, wind calculation in the 302 would serve no purpose, it seems. The 302 definitely calculates the wind. The 303 is a pretty dumb I2C serial display, the "computer" is the 302. The *cost* of calculating the wind in the 302 is likely dominated by the instrumentation hardware used to measure air temp, pitot pressure and calculate TAS etc. Since there is already a processor there the additional cost is just software Darryl |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Greg Arnold wrote:
Marc Ramsey wrote: Greg Arnold wrote: Paul Remde wrote: Hi Dave, Yes. SeeYou gets airspeed and wind data from the 302. The 302 calculates the wind - not SeeYou. So the 302A not only is a logger, but also has a computer that calculates wind? No, the 302 flight computer calculates wind. The 302A flight recorder does not... Marc The 303 manual says that the 303 calculates the wind. Why would it do that if the 302 does the same thing? I've never actually used a 303, but there are several things it will do when connected to a 302, that it simply doesn't do when connected to a 302A. Displaying wind may be one of them. I don't understand why Cambridge would go to the expense of putting a wind calculation computer in the 302 when the 302 always will be connected to another instrument (303 or PDA) that can calculate the wind. Basically, wind calculation in the 302 would serve no purpose, it seems. I wrote my own PDA software, and have used it with both a 302 and a 302A. The 302 data stream contains wind speed and direction (which is pretty close to what I calculate using my own TAS/GS based circling wind calculation) and headwind component (along with a bunch of other data), the 302A does not. Make of that what you will... Marc |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Marc Ramsey wrote:
I wrote my own PDA software, and have used it with both a 302 and a 302A. The 302 data stream contains wind speed and direction (which is pretty close to what I calculate using my own TAS/GS based circling wind calculation) and headwind component (along with a bunch of other data), the 302A does not. Make of that what you will... Interesting -- they must have given the 302 that capacity so it could output to the 303. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Greg Arnold" wrote in message ... Marc Ramsey wrote: I wrote my own PDA software, and have used it with both a 302 and a 302A. The 302 data stream contains wind speed and direction (which is pretty close to what I calculate using my own TAS/GS based circling wind calculation) and headwind component (along with a bunch of other data), the 302A does not. Make of that what you will... Interesting -- they must have given the 302 that capacity so it could output to the 303. Greg, They gave the 302 that capacity so it could talk to the Compaq 15xx PDA software and the 303. Back in the mid 1990s, Cambridge to distribute Pocket Nav PDA software. It was very simular to Glide Navigator (same author.) The "Standard" version was/is free. The standard verson works well with a generic GPS like the Garmin 12XL. The "Plus" version, which wasn't free, provided an interface with both the Model 20 data recorder and L-Nav/S-Nav. The characteristics of Pocket Nav Standard/Plus can be seen at http://www.cambridge-aero.com/pocketNAV.htm. The 302 interface provides enhanced capabilities of both the old flight recorder and L-Nav/S-Nav. Locally we have two glider still running the Standard version in combination with a Garmin 12XL and EW Model D. Two pilots have 302s. One runs the Cambridge software and the other Glide Navigator II. Two pilots have the new microRecorder and run Glider Navigator II on their PDAs. I run Glide Navigator II in combination with a Garmin 12XL and EW Model D. Wayne |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
I stand corrected. Andrej at SeeYou confirmed that SeeYou uses the airspeed information from the 302 and calculates the wind independently. It does not use the 302 supplied wind calculation. The 302 calculates only a single wind number (if I remember correctly). SeeYou calculates winds at several altitudes (if I remember correctly). That would explain why some pilots see different numbers in SeeYou than they do on their 303 display. Good Soaring, Paul Remde Cumulus Soaring, Inc. http://www.cumulus-soaring.com wrote in message oups.com... On Nov 9, 3:05 pm, "Paul Remde" wrote: Hi Dave, Yes. SeeYou gets airspeed and wind data from the 302. The 302 calculates the wind - not SeeYou. If SeeYou does not get wind data from the flight computer it can calculate wind while circling, but the 302 also calculates wind while cruising. Let me know if you ever want some one-on-one phone support for SeeYou. I do that quite often and my customers tell me it is worth every penny. Good Soaring, Paul Remde Cumulus Soaring, Inc.http://www.cumulus-soaring.com wrote in message [snip] Paul - ah are you sure? SeeYou Mobile also gets true airspeed and other data from the 302. SeeYou Mobile is quite capable of using those to guestimate non-circling winds. And it was my impression that it did this and does not directly use the calculated wind data (that is also passed from the 302). It certainly appears to behave that way to me. Dave FYI the Cambridge dataport reference manual is an interesting read, and SeeYou has a terminal mode (MenuSettingsHardwareTerminal) you can look at what is going over the wire. That has helped me in the past at least understand some behavior of SeeYou (and file a bug :-)) - SeeYou support is pretty darn good, check out their Forums. See http://www.cambridge-aero.com/manual...v517_rev21.pdf Cheers Darryl |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul,
Is your instructional CD for CU Mobile still in the works? Mike |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Mike,
Thanks for asking. I have the best intentions, but I have not started it yet. The SeeYou for PC training CDs have sold very well. I hope to get to it soon. Good Soaring, Paul Remde Cumulus Soaring, Inc. http://www.cumulus-soaring.com "Mike125" wrote in message ups.com... Paul, Is your instructional CD for CU Mobile still in the works? Mike |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Using mobile SeeYou | Robert Hart | Soaring | 3 | May 10th 06 09:42 PM |
SeeYou MOBILE v2.0! | Roy McMaster | Soaring | 10 | July 12th 04 12:25 AM |
SeeYou Mobile | Robert Fidler | Soaring | 0 | March 17th 04 04:18 PM |
SeeYou Mobile question | Greg Arnold | Soaring | 1 | February 19th 04 04:24 PM |
SeeYou mobile questions | Andy Durbin | Soaring | 5 | February 19th 04 12:16 AM |