Plane "sharing" experience?

" wrote:
Four people in a Cherokee 140? Are you serious?

a older 140 can have the useful load to carry four people,
especially when you start with the fuel at the tabs. I've even
seen older 140s that have more useful load than a warrior.
Steve Foley had (has?) one with 872lb useful load.

--
Bob Noel
(goodness, please trim replies!!!)

And how many JATO bottles are used during this takeoff?

" wrote in news:5a0b505f-2782-433f-
:


" wrote:
Four people in a Cherokee 140? Are you serious?

a older 140 can have the useful load to carry four people,
especially when you start with the fuel at the tabs. I've even
seen older 140s that have more useful load than a warrior.
Steve Foley had (has?) one with 872lb useful load.

--
Bob Noel
(goodness, please trim replies!!!)

And how many JATO bottles are used during this takeoff?

Two diet coke bottles with Menthos thrown in

Bertie

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
.. .
" wrote in news:5a0b505f-2782-433f-
:


" wrote:
Four people in a Cherokee 140? Are you serious?


And how many JATO bottles are used during this takeoff?

Two diet coke bottles with Menthos thrown in


Good Golly Dewd, don't you know anything? Diet Vernors is way better for
this than Diet Coke. :-)

But I don't think the plan was to have all the owners in the plane at the
same time...

--
Geoff
The Sea Hawk at Wow Way d0t Com
remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail
When immigration is outlawed, only outlaws will immigrate.

"Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe" The Sea Hawk at wow way d0t com wrote in
news:hP6dnUCWgZ8bRfjanZ2dnUVZ_sejnZ2d@wideopenwest .com:

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
.. .
" wrote in
news:5a0b505f-2782-433f-
:


" wrote:
Four people in a Cherokee 140? Are you serious?


And how many JATO bottles are used during this takeoff?

Two diet coke bottles with Menthos thrown in


Good Golly Dewd, don't you know anything? Diet Vernors is way better
for this than Diet Coke. :-)

You learn something new in usenet every day.

But I don't think the plan was to have all the owners in the plane at
the same time...

Used to do 135 in a cherokee 180 out of a very short strip and it would get
anything out of there you could stuff inside of it!
Not a very pleasant airplane to fly, but they are sturdy and they do go
well.


Bertie

On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 02:06:03 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
wrote:

"Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe" The Sea Hawk at wow way d0t com wrote in
news:hP6dnUCWgZ8bRfjanZ2dnUVZ_sejnZ2d@wideopenwes t.com:

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
.. .
" wrote in
news:5a0b505f-2782-433f-
:


" wrote:
Four people in a Cherokee 140? Are you serious?


And how many JATO bottles are used during this takeoff?

Two diet coke bottles with Menthos thrown in


Good Golly Dewd, don't you know anything? Diet Vernors is way better
for this than Diet Coke. :-)

You learn something new in usenet every day.

But I don't think the plan was to have all the owners in the plane at
the same time...

Used to do 135 in a cherokee 180 out of a very short strip and it would get
anything out of there you could stuff inside of it!
Not a very pleasant airplane to fly, but they are sturdy and they do go
well.

I did a photo shoot for a couple of owners wayyy back in 1990 (give or
take a year) One had a Cherokee 140 and the other a 180. I shot from
the 180 to start then we landed at a small airport (Standish
Industrial air-park) which is now private. They both used little
runway for landing, but on take off I didn't think the 140 was going
to make it. The 180 was off in a fraction of the distance.

I enjoyed flying a 180 with the old Hershey Bar wing, but after that
really disliked the 140. Except for landing I remember the two as
being quite different animals although they are both quite docile.

I spun the 180 a number of times. It was only later I found the
factory placard was a mistake. :-)) In a fully developed spin proper
inputs would appear to do nothing unless you waited a full turn to
turn and a half and then it'd stop in another half turn.

Roger (K8RI)


Bertie

On Dec 21, 4:13*am, "Roger (K8RI)" wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 02:06:03 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
wrote:





"Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe" The Sea Hawk *at wow way d0t com wrote in
news:hP6dnUCWgZ8bRfjanZ2dnUVZ_sejnZ2d@wideopenwes t.com:

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...
" wrote in
news:5a0b505f-2782-433f-
:

" wrote:
Four people in a Cherokee 140? Are you serious?

And how many JATO bottles are used during this takeoff?

Two diet coke bottles with Menthos thrown in

Good Golly Dewd, don't you know anything? Diet Vernors is way better
for this than Diet Coke. *:-)

You learn something new in usenet every day.

But I don't think the plan was to have all the owners in the plane at
the same time...

Used to do 135 in a cherokee 180 out of a very short strip and it would get
anything out of there you could stuff inside of it!
Not a very pleasant airplane to fly, but they are sturdy and they do go
well.

I did a photo shoot for a couple of owners wayyy back in 1990 (give or
take a year) One had a Cherokee 140 and the other *a 180. *I shot from
the 180 to start then we landed at a small airport (Standish
Industrial air-park) which is now private. They both used little
runway for landing, but on take off I didn't think the 140 was going
to make it. *The 180 was off in a fraction of the distance.

I enjoyed flying a 180 with the old Hershey Bar wing, but after that
really disliked the 140. Except for landing I remember the two as
being quite different animals although they are both quite docile.

I spun the 180 a number of times. It was only later I found the
factory placard was a mistake. :-)) *In a fully developed spin proper
inputs would appear to do nothing unless you waited a full turn to
turn and a half and then it'd stop in another half turn.



Different from the 140 in spins? cause I used to spin them all the
time for training. I flew a 181 recently and noticed that it wasn´t
certified for spins.
I preferred the square wing ones myself, though i haven´t a lot of
time in the newer ones anyway.


Bertie

On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 22:44:48 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
wrote:

" wrote in news:5a0b505f-2782-433f-
:


" wrote:
Four people in a Cherokee 140? Are you serious?

a older 140 can have the useful load to carry four people,
especially when you start with the fuel at the tabs. I've even
seen older 140s that have more useful load than a warrior.
Steve Foley had (has?) one with 872lb useful load.

--
Bob Noel
(goodness, please trim replies!!!)

And how many JATO bottles are used during this takeoff?

Two diet coke bottles with Menthos thrown in

Bertie
**********************************88

No. No. No Bertie

If all four have a large helping of beans before take off, should
break ground (wind) with no problem )

Big John

Big John wrote in
:

On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 22:44:48 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
wrote:

" wrote in news:5a0b505f-2782-
433f-
:


" wrote:
Four people in a Cherokee 140? Are you serious?

a older 140 can have the useful load to carry four people,
especially when you start with the fuel at the tabs. I've even
seen older 140s that have more useful load than a warrior.
Steve Foley had (has?) one with 872lb useful load.

--
Bob Noel
(goodness, please trim replies!!!)

And how many JATO bottles are used during this takeoff?

Two diet coke bottles with Menthos thrown in

Bertie
**********************************88

No. No. No Bertie

If all four have a large helping of beans before take off, should
break ground (wind) with no problem )


I knew someone would go there!


Bertie

In article ,
" wrote:

Four people in a Cherokee 140? Are you serious?

a older 140 can have the useful load to carry four people,
especially when you start with the fuel at the tabs. I've even
seen older 140s that have more useful load than a warrior.
Steve Foley had (has?) one with 872lb useful load.

And how many JATO bottles are used during this takeoff?

Apparently you haven't flown a 140.

My 140 (and Steve's) require the same take-off roll as a warrior II.

--
Bob Noel
(goodness, please trim replies!!!)

Apparently you haven't flown a 140.

My 140 (and Steve's) require the same take-off roll as a warrior II.

Yep, a 140 that is light on fuel will easily haul four adults.

It helps if they are double-amputees in the back seat, but it'll do
the job in a pinch.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"