A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Space Shuttle.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 28th 07, 06:53 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default Space Shuttle.


"WolfRat" wrote

They could aero-brake from orbit slower but it would take forever.


Not really. If you slow down gradually, the effect of gravity takes hold,
and you start falling faster. Mush of the speed is picked back up in that
manner.

If they launched an unmanned fuel source, docked and then transfered fuel
it could be done.


You still have to pay to get all of that fuel up there. That is not cheap,
let alone the fueling station cost, and the weight to get that up there.

Keep it simple the new Orion(Apollo on steroids) will work just fine. The
Russians have done a good job with safe and repeated journeys from orbit.


I would have more of a warm fuzzy feeling, if that were true. The Russians
have lost a couple crews on the whole re-entry landing procedure, I believe.
At least one, I am positive.

The Orion will be/should be more reliable, because of more simplicity, and
the fact that it will be above the whole rocket, and the fact that it does
not need to be made reusable.
--
Jim in NC


  #2  
Old December 28th 07, 07:12 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Ron Wanttaja
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 756
Default Space Shuttle.

On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 13:53:06 -0500, "Morgans" wrote:

Keep it simple the new Orion(Apollo on steroids) will work just fine. The
Russians have done a good job with safe and repeated journeys from orbit.


I would have more of a warm fuzzy feeling, if that were true. The Russians
have lost a couple crews on the whole re-entry landing procedure, I believe.
At least one, I am positive.


Soyuz 1 and Soyuz 11. The first due to a parachute failure, the second due to
failure of a valve.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soyuz_1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soyuz_11

Ron Wanttaja
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Space Shuttle Frequencies (in UK) ?? Andrew General Aviation 4 September 12th 06 09:26 PM
Space Shuttle Chaos Continues Whatdoyouexpect Instrument Flight Rules 1 March 15th 06 12:45 PM
Boeing 747 Space Shuttle Transporter Jim Piloting 6 August 22nd 05 12:40 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.