![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am sure JJ is familiar with this option #711, since he was in the
group that we organized and brought our own tow planes when we first opened Parowan to big time soaring in the early 90's Retired Racer NK |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Let me look at this another way... Pareto's law says that 80% of your
entrants are cannon fodder. The top pilots will always win, the 80 % guys will always lose. The BIG BUT in this is the unrecognised fact that the race is built on the backs of, and funded by the guys with no chance to win. Excluding these people is not the way to grow the sport. The guys on top need to recognise this, and while I respectfully disagree with both groups because they are drawing lines in the sand in different places, NOBODY has address the real fact. This race looks to be a priveledge instead of a right........... So why can't you have "qualifying" for Parawon. Seeded pilots have a process to do this at a national level. Region 9 pilots might want to consider a method to seed themselves so the guys putting in the time to "earn" the entry get in. As magnanimus as it sounds, the race is open to everybody, and maybe THAT in itself is the issue. There are some, like ME, a very low time beginner that could write the check to enter this thing, and probably have a great time, that are the wrong guys to be there. Gently filtering them out is critical to growing the event. Contests of this caliber are for competent cross country guys, not guys like me who just haven't got the experience........ Regional pilots need to be seeded and the organisers just need to ask how many of the local guys get slotted before accepting out of region contestants. It IS there contest after all...... I see the issue being Region 9's lack of a seeding process, and the non-9 pilots hard feelings at being excluded by the numbers. Both can be worked on..................... What does a guy like me do? I'm calling Karl to set up a "talking ballast" day..... Enjoy the new year. Scott. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
XYZ wrote:
Let me look at this another way... Pareto's law says that 80% of your entrants are cannon fodder. The top pilots will always win, the 80 % guys will always lose. The BIG BUT in this is the unrecognised fact that the race is built on the backs of, and funded by the guys with no chance to win. Excluding these people is not the way to grow the sport. The guys on top need to recognise this, and while I respectfully disagree with both groups because they are drawing lines in the sand in different places, NOBODY has address the real fact. This race looks to be a priveledge instead of a right........... So why can't you have "qualifying" for Parawon. Seeded pilots have a process to do this at a national level. Region 9 pilots might want to consider a method to seed themselves so the guys putting in the time to "earn" the entry get in. As magnanimus as it sounds, the race is open to everybody, and maybe THAT in itself is the issue. There are some, like ME, a very low time beginner that could write the check to enter this thing, and probably have a great time, that are the wrong guys to be there. Gently filtering them out is critical to growing the event. Contests of this caliber are for competent cross country guys, not guys like me who just haven't got the experience........ Regional pilots need to be seeded and the organisers just need to ask how many of the local guys get slotted before accepting out of region contestants. It IS there contest after all...... I see the issue being Region 9's lack of a seeding process, and the non-9 pilots hard feelings at being excluded by the numbers. Both can be worked on..................... What does a guy like me do? I'm calling Karl to set up a "talking ballast" day..... Enjoy the new year. Scott. Scott, There is a seeding process in place. The national pilot ranking system is used. Previously, the entrants are accepted as 1. In region pilots by seeding order 1a - some spots are reserved for reverse seeding order to let in some new guys 2. Any spots left for out of region pilots by seeding order. Ties broken by date of entry. This is slightly oversimplified, but its all detailed in the rules. The change is to reserve somewhere for 0-50% of the slots for in region pilots, still by seeding order. The rest from anywhere, again by seeding order. The issue the rules writers are dealing with is there are enough region 9 pilots entering that very few, if any spots have been left for out of region pilots. And they keep hearing the stories of how wonderful it is and want to play, too. Well, they are really trying to solve the generic problem with popular regional contests, not just Parowan and Region 9. It just has a bigger effect on the excluded Region 9 pilots than it might on pilots in the east half of the country where there are many more "nearby" regional contests to choose from. Distances between soaring sites and competition pilot population density is much lower out here. The oversubscribed regional is a fairly recent problem. The old rules have been in place for a long time, but the success of some sites and organizers in attracting entries have brought the rules into question. Its a nice problem to have, too many glider pilots, unfortunately its very localized. -Dave Leonard |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 1, 11:55 am, ZL wrote:
XYZ wrote: Let me look at this another way... Pareto's law says that 80% of your entrants are cannon fodder. The top pilots will always win, the 80 % guys will always lose. The BIG BUT in this is the unrecognised fact that the race is built on the backs of, and funded by the guys with no chance to win. Excluding these people is not the way to grow the sport. The guys on top need to recognise this, and while I respectfully disagree with both groups because they are drawing lines in the sand in different places, NOBODY has address the real fact. This race looks to be a priveledge instead of a right........... So why can't you have "qualifying" for Parawon. Seeded pilots have a process to do this at a national level. Region 9 pilots might want to consider a method to seed themselves so the guys putting in the time to "earn" the entry get in. As magnanimus as it sounds, the race is open to everybody, and maybe THAT in itself is the issue. There are some, like ME, a very low time beginner that could write the check to enter this thing, and probably have a great time, that are the wrong guys to be there. Gently filtering them out is critical to growing the event. Contests of this caliber are for competent cross country guys, not guys like me who just haven't got the experience........ Regional pilots need to be seeded and the organisers just need to ask how many of the local guys get slotted before accepting out of region contestants. It IS there contest after all...... I see the issue being Region 9's lack of a seeding process, and the non-9 pilots hard feelings at being excluded by the numbers. Both can be worked on..................... What does a guy like me do? I'm calling Karl to set up a "talking ballast" day..... Enjoy the new year. Scott. Scott, There is a seeding process in place. The national pilot ranking system is used. Previously, the entrants are accepted as 1. In region pilots by seeding order 1a - some spots are reserved for reverse seeding order to let in some new guys 2. Any spots left for out of region pilots by seeding order. Ties broken by date of entry. This is slightly oversimplified, but its all detailed in the rules. The change is to reserve somewhere for 0-50% of the slots for in region pilots, still by seeding order. The rest from anywhere, again by seeding order. The issue the rules writers are dealing with is there are enough region 9 pilots entering that very few, if any spots have been left for out of region pilots. And they keep hearing the stories of how wonderful it is and want to play, too. Well, they are really trying to solve the generic problem with popular regional contests, not just Parowan and Region 9. It just has a bigger effect on the excluded Region 9 pilots than it might on pilots in the east half of the country where there are many more "nearby" regional contests to choose from. Distances between soaring sites and competition pilot population density is much lower out here. The oversubscribed regional is a fairly recent problem. The old rules have been in place for a long time, but the success of some sites and organizers in attracting entries have brought the rules into question. Its a nice problem to have, too many glider pilots, unfortunately its very localized. -Dave Leonard Being a Region 9 pilot I don't think there should be a change to the rules. I think this is not fair to the pilots in the region that is declared a super regional. A regional is a place for both good pilots to get better and to let new pilots learn. Every regional has a few national ranked pilots, we don't need to put in place a rule that excludes those in the region from being able to compete in their own regional. Region 9 covers 5 large states with at least five major metropolitan areas spread nearly 500 miles apart. I live in Utah and it is still 300 miles for me to go to Parowan. That would have been like me going to Cal City (Region 12) when I lived in Northern California (Region 11). We are starting to get more interest in racing within the region and are building relationships within the region and to put any new rules in place to diminish this would hurt soaring in our region. Parowan is not a great racing site, but the limitations on numbers and the proximity to the center of the region as well as on a direct highway from Southern California has helped to make it very popular and over subscribed. Cedar City would be a better airport from a safety standpoint. I could not imagine a south takeoff with water. Not to mention the fun of coming home to a 90 degree cross-wind and thunderstorms. The better pilots come because it is going to be the highest level of competition short of a Nationals in the western states. It is similar to Uvalde in the early 90's or Minden in the 80's. Uvalde could handle more ships and allow water that is not possible at Parowan right now. How do we improve the process? 1. Impose an earlier date for a non-refundable registration. This will open up the registration process to those on the list. 2. Encourage other regionals in the area. Why are Minden or Cal City not strong regionals anymore? The soaring at Parowan is good, but other sites such as Minden NV, Air Sailing NV, Ely NV, Logan UT, Pinedale WY, Steamboat Springs, CO can be just as good or better with the capability to handle ships with water and most with multiple runways for increased safety. 3. Reevaluate the nationals process. Only the very top pilots are willing to travel from coast to coast to compete. The time and cost of fuel to trailer from coast to coast is getting harder to justify. We are a large country, maybe it is time to hold multiple contests on each side of the country with a single nationals every other year or so. Have higher pilot ranking values for these contests similar to a nationals. We also need to look at class creep. We have gone from one contest 45 years ago to I would guess 8 classes (1-26, World, Sports, Club, Std, 15M, 18M, Open). How many do we really need? Most top pilots today need access to at least two gliders (Std, 15M/18M). Our system is not producing pilots that are competitive at the world level because we have too few opportunities to really fly with the top pilots in one class often enough. Like 9B I came back to racing after a 10 year break and am just starting to get a little faster (before Parowan in 2004 the last contest I flew I wasn't allowed to use GPS in Uvalde in about 95). I would love to fly two or three competitive contests in a year without having to drive 3000 miles for several of them. Let's leave the rules alone and give those within the region the priority to race near home. Tim (TT) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Super regionals. To apply for a sanctioning approval don't you have to
do that on the initial registration form? Just as I have to say its Region 12 at Warner Springs in 2008, not Region 12 or Region 11....whichever i choose as the time goes by? I also have to list waivers that I may need: extra $money, combined standard/15meter, etc...... I don't think its a maybe we will maybe we won't. The UK have the OverSeas Nationals....it doesn't replace any other contest. The 'super regionals' are not a replacement of any other contest. Another venue for an organizer to do.....heck maybe a few people will show. Maybe some city will get a little extra money.....the geezer glide sure is popular. There was no intent for Parowan to become 'the' super regional site....to my limited knowledge they sanction form was for Region 9. a national uses higher ranked pilots...sorta...but it is only 1 class. But like geezer Glide and the UK Overseas nationals....they are handicapped. a Super regional could have multiple classes....AND it doesn't have to rotate like a US National. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 2, 9:29�pm, g l i d e r s t u d wrote:
Super regionals. To apply for a sanctioning approval don't you have to do that on the initial registration form? Just as I have to say its Region 12 at Warner Springs in 2008, not Region 12 or Region 11....whichever i choose as the time goes by? I also have to list waivers that I may need: extra $money, combined standard/15meter, etc...... I don't think its a maybe we will maybe we won't. The UK have the OverSeas Nationals....it doesn't replace any other contest. The 'super regionals' are not a replacement of any other contest. Another venue for an organizer to do.....heck maybe a few people will show. Maybe some city will get a little extra money.....the geezer glide sure is popular. There was no intent for Parowan to become 'the' super regional site....to my limited knowledge they sanction form was for Region 9. a national uses higher ranked pilots...sorta...but it is only 1 class. But like geezer Glide and the UK Overseas nationals....they are handicapped. a Super regional could have multiple classes....AND it doesn't have to rotate like a US National. You young whipper snapper, its called "The Senior Nationals", we are in the USA, not the UK, and fess up, some out of regional top guns, of which, some chambers are empty, just don't like waiting in line..........wooohoooooooooooo................KaC hing.......... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm confused 711...your shooting blanks?
ydfoc |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Freestate Regionals 2006 | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | April 10th 06 11:52 AM |
Lasham Regionals | Steve Dutton | Soaring | 0 | July 2nd 04 06:00 PM |
Lasham Regionals July 3 - 11 | Steve Dutton | Soaring | 0 | May 27th 04 09:34 PM |
Why no 18m class at Regionals? | John | Soaring | 7 | October 17th 03 02:41 AM |
Gransden regionals traces | Martin Gregorie | Soaring | 5 | September 8th 03 05:48 PM |